Skip to main content
Log in

Managerial compensation structure and firm performance in Chinese PLCs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I examine whether and to what extent intra-firm compensation structure affects managerial incentives and firm performance. Using an unbalanced panel consisting of a total of 43 626 executives in 1362 publicly listed corporations in China during 1999–2007, I find that pay rewards increase as executives move up the corporate hierarchy and that the largest pay gap is between first- and second-tier executives. Pay dispersion is positively related to the number of tournament participants, level of risk in the business environment and firm performance. Moreover, state ownership and corporate governance play some role in determining managerial pay dispersion and firm performance. The empirical results are consistent with tournament theory and against equity, relative deprivation and sabotage theories of managerial compensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, N., Gaston, N. and Kubo, K. (2005) Executive pay in Japan: The role of monitors and the main bank relationship. Japan and the World Economy 17 (3): 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R. and Samwick, A. (2003) Performance incentives within firms: The effect of managerial responsibility. Journal of Finance 58 (4): 1613–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. and Yellen, J. (1990) The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (2): 255–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, J. and Waddell, G. (2003) Executive rank, pay and project selection. Journal of Financial Economics 67 (2): 305–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B.E. and Huselid, M.A. (1992) The incentive effects of tournament compensation systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (2): 336–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingley, P. and Eriksson, T. (2001) Pay spread and skewness, employee effort and firm productivity. Unpublished paper, University of Aarhus, http://www.hha.dk/nat/WPER/01-2_te.pdf.

  • Bognanno, M. (2001) Corporate tournaments. Journal of Labour Economics 19 (2): 290–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. (1994) Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15 (5): 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T., Liu, X. and Skovoroda, R. (2008) Top executive pay and firm performance in China. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (5): 833–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M.A. and Sanders, W.M. (2004) The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. Journal of Management 30 (4): 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K.P. (2003) Sabotage in promotion tournaments. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 19 (1): 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M., Peck, S. and Sadler, G. (2001) Corporate tournaments and executive compensation: Evidence from the UK. Strategic Management Journal 22 (8): 805–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowherd, D. and Levine, D. (1992) Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administration Science Quarterly 37 (2): 302–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devers, C.E., Wiseman, R.M. and Holmes Jr, R.M. (2007) The effects of endowment and loss aversion in managerial stock option valuation. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, T. (1999) Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of Labour Economics 17 (2): 262–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Fung, P.M.Y. and Rui, O.M. (2007) How ownership and corporate governance influence chief executive pay in China's listed firms. Journal of Business Research 60 (7): 776–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X. and Landier, A. (2008) Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. and Fredrickson, J. (2001) Top management team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: A competitive test of economic and behavioural views. Academy of Management Journal 44 (1): 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, F. (2005) Pay inequality and firm performance: Evidence from matched employee data. Applied Economics 37 (11): 1313–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. and Locking, H. (2000) Wage dispersion and productive efficiency: Evidence for Sweden. Journal of Labour Economics 18 (4): 755–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hvide, H. (2002) Tournament rewards and risk-taking. Journal of Labour Economics 20 (4): 877–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, J.R., Reis, E. and Venkateswaran, A. (2009) Rank order tournaments and incentive alignment: The effect of firm performance. Journal of Finance 64 (3): 1479–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T. and Long, S. (2006) Executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance in China: Evidence from firms listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges. Economic Development and Cultural Change 54 (4): 945–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T. and Long, S. (2011) Tournaments and managerial incentives in China's listed firms: New evidence. China Economic Review 22 (1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R., Dharwadkar, R. and Brandes, P. (2005) Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: A longitudinal examination. Journal of Business Research 58 (8): 1078–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. and Rosen, S. (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labour contracts. Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 841–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Lev, B. and Yeo, G. (2008) Executive pay dispersion, corporate governance and firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 30 (3): 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Vertinsky, I. and Zhou, D. (2004) The emergence of private ownership in China. Journal of Business Research 57 (10): 1145–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (1997) The impact of economic reform on the performance of Chinese state enterprises, 1980–1989. Journal of Political Economy 105 (5): 1080–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. (2005) Corporate governance, leadership structure and CEO compensation: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance 13 (6): 824–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, R.L. and Porter, G. (1997) Understanding CEO pay: A test of two pay-to-performance sensitivity measures with alternative measures of alignment and influence. Journal of Business Research 40 (2): 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, B., O'Reilly, C. and Wade, J. (1993) Top executive pay: Tournament or teamwork? Journal of Labour Economics 11 (4): 606–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1982) The fairness of earning differentials: An experimental study of the perception of blue-collar workers. Journal of Human Resource 17 (1): 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K. (1988) Aspects of tournament models: A survey. Research in Labor Economics 9: 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. (2005) The Financial Economics of Privatization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1990) The efficiency of equity in organizational decision processes. American Economic Review 80 (2): 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, C., Main, B. and Graef, C. (1988) CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Administration Science Quarterly 33 (2): 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Langton, N. (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity and working collaboratively. Administration Science Quarterly 38 (3): 382–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pi, L. and Lowe, J. (2011) Can a powerful CEO avoid involuntary replacement? An empirical study from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 28 (4): 775–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, C. (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1): 7–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1986) Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. American Economic Review 76 (4): 701–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P.A. and Hambrick, D.C. (2005) Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects of performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science 16 (3): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Z., Xie, F. and Zhang, S. (2005) Ownership structure and firm value in China's privatised firms: 1991–2001. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40 (1): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks two anonymous referees, Thankom Arun at the University of Central Lancashire and David Sunderland at the University of Greenwich, for their helpful comments on the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, L. Managerial compensation structure and firm performance in Chinese PLCs. Asian Bus Manage 11, 171–193 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2011.31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2011.31

Keywords

Navigation