Abstract
According to previous research, family and non-family businesses differ with respect to corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies in Japan. In this article, we address these differences and explore the main determinants of CSR in Japan, using a sample of 200 Japanese firms drawn randomly from a CSR database. In contrast with this previous research, we find that the characteristics of either family or non-family businesses do not influence CSR policies in general; however, when they do (for example, in human resources management), the influence is less strong for family businesses. We also find that firm size and innovation inclination are explanatory factors for CSR, supporting prior research in contexts other than Japan.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Block and Wagner (2010).show that family and founder ownership is associated with a lower level of CSR concerns, whereas ownership by institutional investors is associated with a higher level of CSR concerns and a lower level of CSR initiatives.
In line with one reviewer’ queries, one may wonder whether there is a specific reason why Tôyô Keizai gave high ratings to a company like TEPCO, such as too-cosy relations between Tôyô Keizai and TEPCO, or any corruption. It should be noted that to the best of our knowledge, this is not the case. This high rating may simply be the result of information asymmetry at the expense of the rating agency (though the reduction of information asymmetry is actually the real goal of the rating process). This suggests that ratings, though highly useful and whatever the precautions taken in the process, must still be treated with some caution.
References
Abdellatif, M., Amann, B. and Jaussaud, J. (2010) Family versus non-family business: A comparison of international strategies. Journal of Family Business Strategy 1 (2): 108–116.
Abegglen, J.C. and Stalk, G. (1985) Kaisha, The Japanese Corporation. New York: Basic.
Allouche, J., Amann, B., Jaussaud, J. and Kurashina, T. (2008) The impact of family control on the performance and financial characteristics of family versus non-family businesses in Japan: A matched-pair investigation. Family Business Review 21 (4): 315–329.
Amann, B., Caby, J., Jaussaud, J. and Piñiero, J. (2007) Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: Law and practices in the United States, Japan, France and Spain. In: D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (eds.) The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Amann, B., Jaussaud, J. and Kanie, A. (2004) Activisme des actionnaires et responsabilité sociale des entreprises au Japon. Ebisu 33 (Fall-Winter): 153–171.
Amato, L. and Amato, C. (2007) The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3): 229–241.
Benedict, R. (1946) The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Block, J.H. (2010) Family management, family ownership and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review 23 (2): 1–22.
Block, J.H. and Wagner, M. (2010) Corporate Social Responsibility in Large Family and Founder Firms. Erasmus Research Institute of Management Research Report no. ERS-2010-027-ORG, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1657793, accessed 12 March 2011.
Bowen, H.R. (1953) Social Responsibilities of Businessmen. New York: Harper & Row.
Brammer, S. and Millington, A. (2006) Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (1): 6–18.
Campbell, J.L. (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32 (3): 946–967.
Chih, H.L., Chih, H.H. and Chen, T.Y. (2010) On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (1): 115–135.
Colpan, A.M., Yoshikawa, T., Hikino, T. and Miyoshi, H. (2007) Japanese corporate governance: Structural change and financial performance. Asian Business and Management 6 (S1): 89–113.
Debroux, P. and Higgins, C. (2009) Globalization and CSR in Asia. Asian Business and Management 8 (2): 125–127.
Deniz, D. and Suarez, M.K.C. (2005) Corporate social responsibility and family business in Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1): 27–36.
Dyer, W.G. and Whetten, D.A. (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (6): 785–802.
Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990) What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 32 (3): 233–258.
Fukukawa, K. and Teramoto, Y. (2009) Understanding Japanese CSR: The reflections of managers in the field of global operations. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1): 133–146.
Godfrey, P.C. and Hatch, N.W. (2007) Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (1): 87–98.
Graafland, J.J. (2002) Corporate social responsibility and family business. Paper presented at the Research Forum of the Family Business Network 13th Annual Conference; October, Helsinki, Finland.
Inoue, Y. and Lee, S. (2011) Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries. Tourism Management 32 (4): 790–804.
Jackson, G. and Moerke, A. (2005) Continuity and change in corporate governance: Comparing Germany and Japan. Corporate Governance 13 (3): 351–361.
Kurashina, T. (2003) Family Kigyô no Keieigaku [Management Studies on Family Business; in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Tôyô Keizai.
Le Breton-Miller, I. and Miller, D. (2006) Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (3): 731–746.
McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117–127.
Miles, L. (2006) The application of Anglo-American corporate practices in societies influenced by Confucian values. Business and Society Review 111 (3): 305–321.
Miyajima, H. and Arikawa, Y. (2001) Changing corporate finance and its impact on corporate strategy after the bubble period: Is long-term strategy of Japanese firms really changing? In: U.C.V. Haley and F.J. Richter (eds.) Asian Post-Crisis Management: Corporate and Government Strategies for Sustainable Competitive Advantage. London: Macmillan/St. Martin.
Miyajima, H. and Kuroki, F. (2007) The unwinding of cross-shareholding in Japan: Causes, effects and implications. In: M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.) Corporate Governance in Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morck, R. and Yeung, B. (2004) Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28 (4): 391–409.
Nakane, C. (1970) Japanese Society. Tokyo, Japan: Tuttle.
Padgett, R. and Galan, J. (2009) The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3): 407–418.
Perry, P. and Tower, N. (2009) Determining the determinants for a strategy of corporate social responsibility by small- and medium-sized enterprises in the UK fashion apparel industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 16 (5): 377–385.
Sethi, S.P. (2003) Setting Global Standards: Guidelines for Creating Codes of Conduct in Multinational Corporations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Tôyô Keizai. (2010) CSR Kigyô Sôkan [CSR Directory of Firms; in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Tôyô Keizai.
Trotman, K. and Bradley, G. (1981) Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6 (4): 355–362.
Udayasankar, K. (2008) Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2): 167–175.
Uhlaner, L.M., Goor-Balk, H.J.M. and Masurel, E. (2004) Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of Dutch firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11 (2): 186–194.
Villalonga, B. and Amit, R. (2004) How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper no. 3620, http://wgfa.wharton.upenn.edu/VillalongaAmit121004.pdf, accessed 12 March 2011.
Wagner, M. (2010) Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4): 581–594.
Wood, D.J. (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 691–718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amann, B., Jaussaud, J. & Martinez, I. Corporate social responsibility in Japan: Family and non-family business differences and determinants. Asian Bus Manage 11, 329–345 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2012.6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2012.6