Skip to main content
Log in

Support for Working Parents: Government Policies and Corporate Responses in Japan

  • Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The falling birth rate is one of the problems of greatest public concern in Japan in recent years. While support for working parents is widely recognized as a key solution for this problem, the government has not adopted strict regulation, but tried to attract voluntary support from employers. To discuss the effect of such ‘soft regulation’, we identify characteristics to explain the responsiveness of firms to such an institutional demand. Using a data set of about 750 Japanese firms compiled from several sources, we conducted factor analysis to identify factors underlying firms' support for working parents, and then examined the association of those factors with various firm characteristics by regression analysis. As a result, progressiveness and time-flexibility are identified as the underlying factors. While they are positively associated with firm size, degree of foreign ownership and attention to corporate social responsibility, there are significant differences in the pattern of association with several characteristics regarding the presence of female workers and the participation of labour unions. Difference across business sectors is also significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details of the episode of ‘birth-giving machines’, see The Independent, 29 January 2007, for example.

  2. Parental leavers may obtain 30 per cent of salary when they take leave. The additional 10 per cent is paid after they return and work for 6 months.

  3. The survey also included questions about the adoption of satellite offices and paid parental leave, but the understanding of those arrangements seemed quite different across firms. For example, some firms identified satellite office with distant work treatment, others as an ordinary branch. Some firms confused paid parental leave with ordinary paid leave, which all workers receive as a basic legal entitlement. Consequently, we decided to exclude those arrangements from the analysis.

  4. It may be better to distinguish on-site childcare service and allowances from off-site childcare services, given that the former is generally much more costly for employers than the latter. This is impossible, however, because the survey failed to distinguish them.

References

  • Arthur, M.M. (2003) ‘Share price reactions to work-family initiatives: an institutional perspective’, Academy of Management Journal 46 (4): 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel, E.A., Moss, S.A., Smyrnios, K. and Tharenou, P. (1999) ‘Employee characteristics associated with the provision of work-family policies and programs’, International Journal of Manpower 20 (8): 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, M.C. (1988) ‘The social-institutional bases of gender stratification: Japan as an illustrative case’, American Journal of Sociology 94 (2): 300–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J.W. and Mumford, K. (2004) ‘Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review 57 (2): 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office Japan. (2005) Danjo kyodo sankaku shakai ni kansuru seron chosa (Survey on equal participation society), Tokyo: Cabinet Office Japan.

  • DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields’, American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S.D. and Greenhaus, J.H. (2000) Work and family — allies or enemies? what happens when business professionals confront life choices, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J.L. and Estes, S.B. (1997) ‘The family responsive workplace’, Annual Review of Sociology 23: 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J.D. (1994) ‘Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: employer involvement in work-family issues’, Academy of Management Journal 37 (2): 350–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G.G. (1991) ‘Industry determinants of organisational culture’, Academy of Management Review 16 (2): 396–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J.H. and Parasuraman, S. (1999) ‘Research on Work, Family and Gender: Current Status and Future Directions’, in G.N. Powell (ed.) Handbook of Gender and Work, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 391–412.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.T. and Parker, V.A. (1993) ‘The role of workplace flexibility in managing diversity’, Organisational Dynamics 22 (1): 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P. and Simons, T. (1995) ‘Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues’, Academy of Management Journal 38 (5): 1466–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii-Kuntz, M., Makino, K., Kato, K. and Tsuchiya, M. (2004) ‘Japanese fathers of preschoolers and their involvement in childcare’, Journal of Marriage and Family 66 (3): 779–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JTUC Research Institute for Advancement of Living Standards. (1996) Josei rodosha no kyaria keisei to jinji shogun seido no unyo jittai ni kansuru chosakenkyu hokokusho (Study report on career development of female workers and actual function of human resource system), Tokyo: JTUC Research Institute for Advancement of Living Standards.

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977) ‘Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women’, American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A.M. and Mangel, R. (2000) ‘The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity’, Strategic Management Journal 21: 1225–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruo, N. (1998) ‘Shigoto to katei ni kakawaru shakaihosho seisaku no kadai (Problems of social security policy regarding work and family)’, Nihon Rodokenkyu Zasshi 459, pp. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, S. (2006) ‘Kigyo ni okeru shigoto to kateiseikatsu no ryoritsu shien saku (Measures to facilitate work-life balance by firms)’, Life Design Report 2006 7–8, Dai-ichi Life Research Institute Inc, Tokyo.

  • Milliken, F.J., Martins, L.L. and Morgan, H. (1998) ‘Explaining organisational responsiveness to work-family issues: the role of human resource executives as issue interpreters’, Academy of Management Journal 41 (5): 580–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2006) Gakko kihon chosa (Basic survey of schools), Tokyo: MoECSST.

  • Ministry of Finance. (2000) Shoshikoreika no shinten to kongo no wagakuni keizaishakai no tenbo (Falling birth-rate, ageing and prospects for Japanese economy and society in the future), Tokyo: MoF.

  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour. (2002) Shoshika taisaku purasu wan (Policies for falling birth-rate plus one), Tokyo: MoHWL.

  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour. (2003) Jisedai ikusei shien ni kansuru tomen no torikumi hoshin (Current policies about support for the upbringing of the next generation), Tokyo: MoHWL.

  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour. (2004) ‘Shussei zengo no shugyo henka ni kansuru tokei’ no gaikyo — Jinko dotai shokugyo sangyo betsu tokei to 21seiki shusseiji judan chosa no rinkeji bunseki (Overview of ‘Statistics on change in employment before and after childbirth’ — a linkage analysis of statistics of population dynamics by work and industry and a chronological survey on childbirth in the 21st century), Tokyo: MoHWL.

  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour. (2005a) Heisei 16 nendo josei koyo kanri kihon chosa (Basic survey on the labour management of women in 2004), Tokyo: MoHWL.

  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour. (2005b) Jugatsu wa ‘shigoto to katei’ o kangaeru gekkan desu (October is the month for considering ‘work and family’), Press release, 29 September.

  • Morgan, H. and Milliken, F.J. (1992) ‘Keys to action: understanding differences in organisations’ responsiveness to work-and family issues’, Human Resource Management 31 (3): 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita, Y. and Kaneko, Y. (1998) ‘Ikuji kyugyo seido no fukyu to josei koyosha no kinzoku nensu (The spread of the childcare leave system and its impact on female workers)’, Nihon Rodokenkyu Zasshi 459, pp. 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006) Education at a Glance 2006, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • Osterman, P. (1995) ‘Work/family programs and the employment relationship’, Administration Science Quarterly 40: 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, J.E. and Blum, T.C. (2000) ‘Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organisational performance’, Academy of Management Journal 43: 1107–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengo. (2003) ‘Josei no sankaku wa isen teitai (Female participation remains stagnant)’, Weekly Rengo 617, Available at http://www.jtuc-rengo.or.jp/news/weekly/no617/01.html (accessed on 9 May 2008).

  • Sasaki, T. (2005) ‘Joseini yasashii kaisha ha yoi kaishaka (Is a Firm Friendly to Women a Good Firm?)’, in T. Shinposha (ed.) Saikyo CSR keiei (The Most Powerful CSR Management), Tokyo: Toyokeizai Shinposha, pp. 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigeno, Y. (2006) ‘Shuro to shussan ikuji no ryoritsu — Kigyo no ikuji shien to hoikujo no shusseiritsu kaifuku eno kouka (Balancing work and childbirth/care — the effect of firms’ support for childcare and nurseries on recovery from childbirth)’, in Y. Higuchi (ed.) Shoshika to nihon no keizai shakai (Falling birth-rate and Japanese economy and society), Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha, pp. 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigeno, Y. and Okusa, Y. (1998) ‘Ikuji kyugyo seido no josei no kekkon to shugyo keizoku eno eikyo (The impact of the childcare leave system on women's marriage and job continuation)’, Nihon Rodokenkyu Zasshi 459, pp. 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, S., Kruckman, L. and Steinberg, S. (2000) ‘Reinventing fatherhood in Japan and Canada’, Social Science & Medicine 50 (9): 1257–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanimoto, K. (2003) SRI Shakaiteki sekinin toshi nyumon (Guidebook of socially responsible investment), Tokyo: Nihon keizai shinbunsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telework Promotion Forum. (2006) Telework Promotion Forum kaiin ni taisuru anketo chosakekka no gaiyo (Outline of result of the survey of Telework Promotion Forum members), Tokyo: Telework Promotion Forum.

  • Toyo Keizai Shinposha. (2005) CSR Kigyo Soran (Firm Data on CSR), Tokyo: Toyo Keizai.

  • Waldfogel, J., Higuchi, Y. and Abe, M. (1999) ‘Family leave policies and women's retention after childbirth: evidence from the United States, Britain and Japan’, Journal of Population Economy 12: 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S.J., de Menezes, L.M. and Lasaosa, A. (2003) ‘Family-friendly management in Great Britain: testing various perspectives’, Industrial Relations 42 (2): 221–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The survey data were provided in electric form by Toyokeizai Shinposha. Interviews with firms were conducted for a project sponsored by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. We thank them for their permission to use relevant information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

See Table A1.

Table a1 Sectoral profile of interviewed firms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, K., Tanimoto, K. & Atsumi, N. Support for Working Parents: Government Policies and Corporate Responses in Japan. Asian Bus Manage 7, 297–319 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2008.12

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2008.12

Keywords

Navigation