Article
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis (2008) 68, 148–155. doi:10.1057/ajp.2008.4
Psychoanalysis, a Bridge Between Attachment Research and Neurobiology
Paper presented at the Clinical Sándor Ferenczi Conference, August 2–6, 2006, Baden-Baden, Germany.
Mario Rendon1
Correspondence: Mario Rendon, M.D., 333 East 30th Street, 8L, New York, NY 10016. e-mail: mrendon@pol.net
1Mario Rendon, M.D., Distinguished Member, American Institute for Psychoanalysis; Past Editor, The American Journal of Psychoanalysis; Member, Centro Psychoanalítico de Madrid; Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
Abstract
Attachment theory and neurobiology are at the forefront of scientific research, particularly in the area of child psychiatry. Several authors have encountered a surprising isomorphism between findings in these areas and concepts central in psychoanalysis. The author postulates that attachment theory is an outcome of the history of the transformation of the old concept of libido now applied interpersonally. The author also postulates that the neurobiology of attachment mediates but does not substitute psychoanalysis for the final understanding of the human bond. Findings in both fields, attachment theory and psychobiology, often compellingly lead to psychoanalytic concepts; on the other hand, the neurobiology of the psyche does not make full sense without the wealth of research conducted by psychoanalysts during the 20th century. The concept of seduction in particular, in its broad sense, is akin to mirroring and attachment and a useful tool in this regard. Although some cling to the idea of the purity of psychoanalysis and see these kin areas as a threat to its integrity, the author believes that psychoanalysis, serving as a bridge between them, can only be enriched by their empirical and experimental outcomes.
Keywords:
psychoanalysis, attachment theory, seduction, psychobiology, neurobiology

