Correspondence: Burton Norman Seitler, PhD, 10 Wilsey Square (PH), Ridgewood, NJ 07450; e-mail: binsightfl@aol.com

¹Ph.D., is a psychoanalyst/clinical psychologist in private practice. Director of Counseling And Psychotherapy Services-R (C.A.P.S-R), Ridgewood and Oakland, New Jersey. Faculty, Director of the Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy Studies Program, New Jersey Institute for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy (NJI), Teaneck, New Jersey.

Abstract

Science tries to explain phenomena in ways that are demonstrable and replicable to develop logical, coherent, parsimonious, and predictive theoretical systems. Yet hyperactive children are given stimulants to "calm" them down, despite the fact that science would predict stimulants would increase hyperactivity. Bradley (1937, 1950) observed that half of the behavior-problem children to whom he administered a stimulant for one week became subdued. He called this finding paradoxical, speculating that inhibitory centers of the central nervous system were stimulated. While Bradley's assertion of a paradoxical reverse effect in children may be an empirical observation, it is not an explanation. The Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) is inferred to exist from hyperactive behavior, which in turn, is inferred to be neurological in origin, a circular argument. An inevitable consequence of the belief in the hypothetical neurological etiology of ADHD is that children are typically given stimulants. Using the case of a seven-year old child, described as experiencing ADHD, who was treated successfully without medication as an illustration, the author provides an alternative, more parsimonious explanation of the etiology, suggesting that ADHD is related to agitated depression.