Acta Politica (2007) 42, 355–379. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500169

Towards an Analysis of Voting Power in Parliament: an Exploration into Coalition-Making in Nordic Parliaments

Jan-Erik Lanea and Reinert Maelandb

  1. aDepartment of Political Science, The University of Geneva, Uni-Mail, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. E-mail: jan-erik.lane@politic.unige.ch
  2. bDepartment of Statistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. E-mail: reinert.maeland@stat.lu.se
Top

Abstract

In this explorative paper, coalitions in national assemblies are analysed as n-person games with the Penrose-Banzhaf solution concept. It is shown that forming minority coalitions may result from a rational strategy to maximize voting power. Thus, there is no need to attempt a permanent minimum winning coalition. Moreover, maximizing voting power for a group of players like a disciplined political party involves the making of temporary coalitions over the entire political space, as anything goes. The examples looked at include the present Nordic parliamentary situation in Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway and Iceland.

Keywords:

calculus and interpretation, Nordic parliaments, minority coalitions, Wicksell's unanimity principle, Penrose-Banzhaf approach, Machiavellianism as maximizing voting power, multipartism

Extra navigation

.

Association resources

ADVERTISEMENT