Skip to main content
Log in

Does the government agreement’s grip on policy fade over time? An analysis of policy drift in Belgium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Government agreements (GAs) are key drivers of future policies in most countries with multi-party coalitions and also serve to limit policy initiatives not included in the GA. However, little is known about how this ‘grip’ of GAs over policies changes over time. Throughout the legislative term, new policy issues arise and public demands change. If governments are responsive, they address these issues, leading to increasing divergence from the GA: policy drift. The central question this study addresses is whether the changing social and politico-strategic environment leads to a fading grip of the GA on policy, causing policy drift vis-à-vis the initial policy program. Using an agenda-setting approach, we map the policy priorities of the GAs to two measures of policy priorities of Belgian governments from 1992 to 2006: ministerial council decisions and state of the union speeches. Despite evidence of intrusion of policy issues from beyond the GA, we do not find policy drift, in terms of systematic temporally determined deviation from the ‘original’ policy priorities. Hence, this study finds that GAs, at least in Belgium, maintain control over the policy agenda, both as a source and a constraint, on future policies throughout the legislature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In addition, correlations were also run excluding issues where both the independent and the dependent variable were zero. Although these correlations were slightly lower, similarly, no pattern emerged here either.

References

  • Baumgartner, F. and Jones, B. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F., Jones, B. and Wilkerson, J. (2011) Comparative studies of policy dynamics. Comparative Political Studies 44 (8): 947–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2007) Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T.A. (1997) After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T.A. (1998) Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breeman, G., Lowery, D., Poppelaars, C., Resodihardjo, S., Timmermans, A. and de Vries, J. (2009) Political attention in a coalition system: Analysing Queen’s speeches in the Netherlands 1945–2007. Acta Politica 44 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes, W. (2000) Vice-premiers en kernkabinetten. Een evaluatie van deze innovaties. Res Publica 42 (1): 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, R. and Thomson, R. (2008) Election pledges and their enactment in coalition governments: A comparative analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 18 (3): 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, C. (2006) De Kleermaker en de Keizer. Inleiding tot politiek en politieke wetenschappen. Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewachter, W. (2003) De werking van de Belgische regering. In: M. Deweerdt, C. De Ridder and R. Dillemans (eds.) Wegwijs politiek. Leuven: Davidsfonds, pp. 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, L., Della Porta, D. and Deschouwer, K. (1996) Comparing similar countries: Italy and Belgium. Res Publica 38 (2): 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, L., Timmermans, A. and Dumont, P. (2000) Coalition formation and governance in Belgium: Of government gospels, evangelist, followers and heretics. In: W. Müller and K. Strom (eds.) Coalition Government in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J.S. (2005) Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In: W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds.) Beyond Continuity Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W., Bevan, S. and John, P. (2011) The agenda of British government: The speech from the Throne, 1911–2008. Political Studies 59 (1): 74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, P. and Jennings, W. (2010) Punctuations and turning points in British politics: The policy agenda of the Queen’s speech, 1940–2005. British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 561–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. and Baumgartner, F. (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R. and Budge, I. (1994) Parties, Policies and Democracy. Oxford: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansergh, L. and Thomson, R. (2007) Election pledges, party competition, and policymaking. Comparative Politics 39 (3): 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. and Budge, I. (2005) Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moury, C. (2011) Coalition agreement and party mandate: How coalition agreements constrain the ministers. Party Politics 17 (3): 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moury, C. (2013) Coalition Governments and Party Mandate: How Do Coalition Agreements Constrain Ministerial Action. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyse, V. and Dumoulin, A. (2011) Le processus décisionnel belge en matière d’opérations civilo-militaires. Courrier hebdomadaire: 2086–2087.

  • Müller, W. and Strøm, K. (2003) Coalition Government in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.L. and De Ridder, M. (1986) Government formation as a policy-making arena. Legislative Studies Quarterly 11 (4): 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallings, C. (1987) The influence of election programmes: Britain and Canada 1945–1979. In: I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. Hearl (eds.) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B., Dumont, P. and Dandoy, R. (2005) L’effet des médias et des programmes de partis sur le contenu des accords de gouvernement, 1991–1999: particratie ou médiacratie? In: S. Walgrave, L. De Winter and M. Nuytemans (eds.) Politieke-agendasetting in België – Mise à l’agenda politique en Belgique (1991–2000). Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press, pp. 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royed, T. (1996) Testing the mandate model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher eras. British Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 45–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (2001) The programme-to-policy linkage: The fulfillment of election pledges on socioeconomic policy in the Netherlands, 1986–1998. European Journal of Political Research 40 (2): 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, A. (2003) High Politics in the Low Countries: An empirical Study of Coalition Agreements in Belgium and The Netherlands. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, A. (2006) Standing apart and sitting together: Enforcing coalition agreements in multiparty systems. European Journal of Political Research 45: 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, A. and Moury, C. (2006) Coalition governance in Belgium and The Netherlands: Rising government stability against all electoral odds. Acta Politica 41 (4): 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., De Winter, L. and Nuytemans, M. (2005) Politieke-agendasetting in België, 1991–2000: de moeilijke dialoog tussen publieke opinie, media en het politieke systeem. Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S. and Varone, F. (2008) Punctuated equilibrium and agenda-setting: Bringing parties back in: Policy change after the Dutroux crisis in Belgium. Governance 21 (3): 365–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., Varone, F. and Dumont, P. (2006) Policy with or without parties? A comparative analysis of policy priorities and policy change in Belgium, 1991–2000. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 1021–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A.B. (1964) The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Joly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joly, J., Zicha, B. & Dandoy, R. Does the government agreement’s grip on policy fade over time? An analysis of policy drift in Belgium. Acta Polit 50, 297–319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.18

Keywords

Navigation