Notes
The Wellcome collection is a museum in London, United Kingdom, that is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is the world’s largest independent charitable foundation funding research into human and animal health. The exhibition ran from end of March to mid June 2012. More information is available online: www.wellcomecollection.org/whats-on/exhibitions/brains.aspx, accessed 6 May 2013.
The conference was co-organised by the European Neuroscience and Society Network (ENSN) and the Institute for Science Innovation and Society (InSIS) and hosted at the Said Business School, University of Oxford, on 7 and 8 December 2010. For more information see: www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/school/events-0/neurosociety-conference-what-it-brain-these-days accessed 10 August 2015.
References
Brenninkmeijer, J. (2010) Taking care of one’s brain: How manipulating the brain changes people’s selves. History of Human Sciences 23 (1): 107–126.
Choudhury, S., McKinney, K.A. and Merten, M. (2012) Rebelling against the brain: Public engagement with the ‘neurological adolescent’. Social Science and Medicine 74 (4): 565–573.
Choudhury, S., Nagel, S.K. and Slaby, J. (2009) Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties 4 (1): 61–77.
Choudhury, S. and Slaby, J. (eds.) (2012) Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cohn, S. (2004) Increasing resolution, intensifying ambiguity: An ethnographic account of seeing life in brain scans. Economy and Society 33 (1): 54–76.
deLaet, M. and Mol, A. (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 30 (2): 225–263.
Dussauge, I. (2015) Sex, cash and neuromodels of desire. BioSocieties 10 (4): 444–464.
Fitzgerald, D. and Callard, F. (2015) Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society 32 (1): 3–32.
Fitzgerald, D., Littlefield, M.M., Knudsen, K.J., Tonks, J. and Dietz, M.J. (2014) Ambivalence, equivocation and the politics of experimental knowledge: A transdisciplinary neuroscience encounter. Social Studies of Science 44 (5): 701–721.
Frazzetto, G. and Anker, S. (2009) Neuroculture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10 (11): 815–821.
Hartmann, M. (2011) Neuroökonomie und neurokapitalismus. Am Beispiel des Vertrauens. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (3): 391–402.
Jensen, C.B. (2010) Ontologies for Developing Things: Making Health Care Futures Through Technology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Joyce, K.A. (2008) Magnetic Appeal: MRI and the Myth of Transparency. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kwint, M. and Wingate, R. (2012) Brains: Mind as Matter. London: Wellcome Collection.
Law, J. and Singleton, V. (2005) Object lessons. Organization 12 (3): 331–355.
Littlefield, M.M. and Johnson, J.M. (2012) The Neuroscientific Turn: Transdisciplinarity in the Age of the Brain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Maasen, S. and Sutter, B. (eds.) (2007) On Willing Selves. Neoliberal Politics vis-à-vis the Neuroscientific Challenge. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, P. (2015) Commercialising neurofutures: Promissory economies, value creation and the making of a new industry. BioSocieties 10 (4): 422–443.
Nadesan, M.H. (2008) Governmentality, Biopower, and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
O’Connor, C., Rees, G. and Joffe, H. (2012) Neuroscience in the public sphere. Neuron 74 (2): 220–226.
Ortega, F. (2009) The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. BioSocieties 4 (4): 425–445.
Ortega, F. and Vidal, F. (eds.) (2011) Neurocultures: Glimpses into an Expanding Universe. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
Pickersgill, M. (2013) The social life of the brain: Neuroscience in society. Current Sociology 61 (3): 322–340.
Pickersgill, M., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Martin, P. (2011) Constituting neurologic subjects: Neuroscience, subjectivity and the mundane significance of the brain. Subjectivity 4 (3): 346–365.
Pickersgill, M. and van Keulen, I. (eds.) (2011) Sociological Reflections on the Neuroscience. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Pitts-Taylor, V. (2010) The plastic brain: Neoliberalism and the neuronal self. Health 14 (6): 635–652.
Racine, E., Waldman, S., Rosenberg, J. and Illes, J. (2010) Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Social Science and Medicine 71 (4): 725–733.
Reichertz, J. (2006) Akteur Gehirn – oder das vermeintliche Ende des sinnhaft handelnden und kommunizierenden Subjekts. In: J. Reichertz and N. Zaboura (eds.) Akteur Gehirn – oder das vermeintliche Ende des handlenden Subjekts. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialswissenschaften.
Rose, N. (2001) The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society 18 (6): 1–30.
Rose, N. (2013) The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (1): 3–34.
Rose, N. and Abi-Rached, J. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schneider, T. and Woolgar, S. (2012) Technologies of ironic revelation: Enacting consumers in neuromarkets. Consumption Markets & Culture 15 (2): 169–189.
Schneider, T. and Woolgar, S. (2015) Neuromarketing in the making: enactment and reflexive entanglement in an emerging field. BioSocieties 10 (4).
Schüll, N.D. and Zaloom, C. (2011) The shortsighted brain: Neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time. Social Studies of Science 41 (4): 515–538.
Schwarzkopf, S. (2015) Measurement devices and the psychophysiology of consumer behaviour: A posthuman genealogy of neuromarketing. BioSocieties 10 (4): 465–482.
Shapin, S. (2008) The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Thornton, D.J. (2011) Brain Culture: Neuroscience and Popular Media. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Vidal, F. (2009) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of Human Sciences 22 (1): 5–36.
Vikkelsø, S. (2007) Description as intervention: Engagement and resistance in actor-network analyses. Science as Culture 16 (3): 297–309.
Vrecko, S. (2010) Neuroscience, power and culture: An introduction. History of the Human Sciences 23 (1): 1–10.
Vrecko, S. (2011) Addiction, Science and Libidinal Economies: Towards a de-centering of the reward system? International Seminar: Addicts as Biocitizens? Neurobiology, Addiction and Society. Goeteborg, Sweden: The Sahlgrenska Academy.
Woolgar, S. and Lezaun, J. (2013) The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–340.
Woolgar, S. and Lezaun, J. (2015) Missing the (question) mark: What is the turn to ontology? Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 462–467.
Woolgar, S. and Neyland, D. (2013) Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zuiderent-Jerak, T. and Jensen, C.B. (2007) Editorial introduction: Unpacking ‘intervention’ in science and technology studies. Science as Culture 16 (3): 227–235.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the European Neuroscience and Society Network (ENSN), London School of Economics and Political Sciences/King’s College London, and the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society (InSIS), University of Oxford, for generously sponsoring a 2-day international conference entitled “Neurosociety… what is it with the brain these days” that the authors organised at the Saïd Business School in December 2010. Thank you to all members of ENSN and InSIS, and conference participants for their contributions and for making the conference such a stimulating and successful event. Finally, they would like to thank the editors of BioSocieties for their support and constructive feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, T., Woolgar, S. Neuroscience beyond the laboratory: Neuro knowledges, technologies and markets. BioSocieties 10, 389–399 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.38
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.38