Abstract
The literature on childbirth organisations focuses on their critique of medical definitions of birth practices, their efforts to promote ‘natural’ or ’normal’ birth, their espousal of choice rhetoric and their relationship to feminism. It says little, however, about the practices these organisations use to achieve their aims. Our study of the United Kingdom, Ireland, Portugal and France explores the centrality of knowledge-based activities to childbirth activism. Through these activities, we show, organisations (i) elicit the emergence of a concerned public through constituting evidence about women’s experiences of childbirth and obstetric practices; (ii) produce evidence about obstetric practices from women’s perspectives; (iii) articulate this vision of obstetric practices with a critical appraisal of scientific literature; and (iv) make visible international networks of actors who share similar concerns and conceptions. Drawing upon our empirical data we propose the notion of evidence-based activism in order to capture the specificity of birth organisations’ modes of engagement and to describe what they bring about. Through evidence-based activism childbirth organisations get involved in policy making and become recognised as legitimate stakeholders; reframe the issues at stake; open debate with other stakeholders; and bring about changes in the health system. Knowledge-based activities also shape the missions and objectives of the organisations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of the organisations we studied.
References
AIMS Ireland (2007) Members eNewsletter 2(2).
Akrich, M. (2010) From communities of practice to epistemic communities: Health mobilizations on the internet. Sociological Research Online 15 (2): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/2/10.html.
Akrich, M. and Pasveer, B. (2004) Embodiment and disembodiment in childbirth narratives. Body & Society. Special Issue on Bodies on Trial 10 (June 2004): 63–84.
Allsop, J., Jones, K. and Baggott, R. (2004) Health consumer groups in the UK: A new social movement? Sociology of Health and Illness 26 (6): 737–756.
Anglin, M. (1997) Working from the inside out: Implications of breast cancer activism for biomedical policies and practices. Social Science & Medicine 44 (9): 1403–1415.
Armstrong, E.M. and Declercq, E. (2011) Is it time to push yet? The challenges to advocacy in US childbirth. In: B. Hoffman, N. Tomes, R. Grob and M. Schlesinger (eds.) Patients as Policy Actors. London: Rutgers University Press, pp. 60–82.
Baggott, R., Allsop, J. and Jones, K. (2005) Speaking for Patients and Carers. Health Consumer Groups and the Policy Process. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barbot, J. (2006) How to build and ‘active’ patient? The work of AIDS associations in France. Social Science & Medicine 62 (3): 538–551.
Beckett, K. (2005) Choosing cesarean: Feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States. Feminist Theory 6 (3): 251–275.
Beckett, K. and Hoffman, B. (2005) Challenging medicine: Law, resistance, and the cultural politics of childbirth. Law & Society Review 39 (1): 125–170.
Beech, B.L. (1997) Normal birth: Does it exist? AIMS Journal 9 (2): 4–8.
Beech, B.L. (2008) Making normal birth a reality. AIMS Journal 20 (4): 19–23.
Beech, B.L. (2011) Challenging the medicalisation of birth. AIMS Journal 23 (2): 4–10.
Bel, B. (2004) Protocoles obstétricaux et données probantes des études scientifiques: une panacée? Journées annuelles de santé publique. Conférence annuelle de l’Association pour la santé publique du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Belghiti, J., Kayem, G., Dupont, C., Rudigoz, R.-C., Bouvier-Colle, M.-H. and Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2011) Oxytocin during labour and risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage: A population–based, cohort nested case–control study. BMJ Open 1: e000514.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011) Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: The birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 343, bmj.d7400.
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello-Frosch, R. and Altman, R.G. (2004) Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health & Illness 26 (1): 50–80.
Buechler, S.M. (1995) New social movement theories. Sociological Quarterly 36 (3): 441–464.
Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–223.
Crossley, M.L. (2007) Childbirth, complications and the illusion of ‘choice’: A case study. Feminism Psychology 17 (4): 543–563.
Darra, S. (2009) ‘Normal’, ‘natural’, ‘good’ or ‘good-enough’ birth: Examining the concepts. Nursing Inquiry 16 (4): 297–305.
Dick-Read, G. (1956) The Natural Childbirth Primer. New York: Harper.
Dodwell, M. and Newburn, M. (2010) Normal Birth as a Measure of the Quality of Care: Evidence on Safety, Effectiveness and Women’s Experiences. London: Natural Childbirth Trust.
Donovan, S. (2006) Inescapable burden of choice? The impact of a culture of prenatal screening on women’s experiences of pregnancy. Health Sociology Review 15 (4): 397–405.
Downe, S. (2004) Normal Childbirth: Evidence and Debate. London: Churchill Livingstone.
Downe, S., McCormick, C. and Beech, B.L. (2001) Labour interventions associated with normal birth. British Journal of Midwifery 9 (10): 602–606.
EPOKS partners (2009) European patient organizations in knowledge society. Project n° SIS-CT-2009-230307, European Commission, 7th Framework program.
Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Epstein, S. (2008) Patient groups and health movements. In: E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wajcman (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn. Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 499–538.
Epstein, S. (2011) Measuring success: Scientific, institutional, and cultural effects of patient advocacy. In: B. Hoffman, N. Tomes, R. Grob and M. Schlesinger (eds.) Patients as Policy Actors. London: Rutgers University Press, pp. 257–277.
Gillis, S. and Munford, R. (2004) Genealogies and generations: The politics and praxis of third wave feminism. Women’s History Review 13 (2): 165–182.
Goer, H. (2003) ‘Spin Doctoring’ the research. Birth 30 (2): 124–129.
Goer, H. (2004) Humanizing birth: A global grassroots movement. Birth 31 (4): 308–314.
Graham, I.D. (1998) Processes of change in obstetrics: A cross-national case-study of episiotomy. Health 2 (4): 403–433.
Gyte, G., Dodwell, M.J. and Macfarlane, A.J. (2011) Home birth metaanalysis: Does it meet AJOG’s reporting requirements? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 204 (4): e15.
Gyte, G., Newburn, M. and Macfarlane, A. (2010) Critique of a meta-analysis by Wax and colleagues which has claimed that there is a three-times greater risk of neonatal death among babies without congenital anomalies planned to be born at home. 7 July 2010, http://www.scribd.com/doc/34065092/Critique-of-a-meta-analysis-by-Wax, accessed 30 March 2012.
Halfon, S. (2010) Encountering birth: Negotiating expertise, networks, and my STS self. Science as Culture 19 (1): 61–77.
Hausman, B.L. (2005) Risky business: Framing childbirth in hospital settings. Journal of Medical Humanities 6 (1): 23–38.
Hensley Owens, K. (2009) Confronting rhetorical disability: A critical analysis of women’s birth plans. Written Communication 26 (3): 247–272.
Homer, C. and Broom, A. (2012) Evidence-based paradigms and contemporary midwifery. In: A. Broom and J. Adams (eds.) Evidence-based Healthcare in Context: Critical Social Science Perspectives. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 155–176.
Hunter, B. (2007) The All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Labour: What Are the Experiences of Midwives, Doctors, Managers and Mothers? Swansea: School of Health Science, Swansea University. Final project report.
Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Johanson, R. and Newburn, M. (2001) Promoting normality in childbirth. British Medical Journal 323 (7322): 1142–1143.
Johanson, R., Newburn, M. and Macfarlane, A. (2002) Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? British Medical Journal 324 (7342): 892–895.
Kitzinger, S. (1975) Some Mothers’ Experiences of Induced Labour. London: National Childbirth Trust.
Kitzinger, S. (1987) Some Women’s Experiences of Epidurals: A Descriptive Study. London: Natural Childbirth Trust.
Kitzinger, S. and Walters, R. (1981) Some Women’s Experiences of Episiotomy. London: Natural Childbirth Trust.
Latour, B. (2005) From realpolitik to dingpolitik or how to make things public. In: B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds.) Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy. Karlsruhe, Cambridge (MA): ZKM, MIT Press, pp. 14–31.
Latour, B. (2008) What Is the Style of Matters of Concern? Two Lectures in Empirical Philosophy. Spinoza Lectures at the University of Amsterdam, April and May 2005. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
Loup, C. (2005) Accouchement à domicile, note préparée pour le groupe de travail de la HAS sur les grossesses physiologiques.
Luna, Z. (2009) From rights to justice: Women of color changing the face of US reproductive rights organizing. Societies without Borders 4 (3): 343–365.
Maternity Care Working Party (2007) Making normal birth a reality: Consensus statement from the Maternity Care Working Party. London: NCT/ RCM/ RCOG.
Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998) Reading Birth and Death. A History of Obstetric Thinking. Bloomington & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2007) Intrapartum Care: Management and Delivery of Care to Women in Labour. London: RCOG Press.
NCT (2011) NCT Policy Briefing: Midwife-led Units, Community Maternity Units and Birth Centres. November London: NCT.
Newburn, M. (2012) The best of both worlds: Patients’ motivation for using an alongside birth centre from an ethnographic study. Midwifery 28 (1): 61–66.
Newburn, M. and Singh, D. (2003) Creating a Better Birth Environment: Women’s Views About the Design and Facilities in Maternity Units: A National Survey. An Audit Toolkit. London: NCT.
Phan, E. (2010) La remise en cause de pratiques médicales professionnelles de la part des usagers de la périnatalité. Quelle légitimité? Revue de médecine périnatale 2 (1): 48–53.
Pichardo, N.A. (1997) New social movements: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1): 411–430.
Rabeharisoa, V. and Callon, M. (2002) The involvements of patients’ associations in research. International Social Science Journal 54 (171): 57–65.
Rabeharisoa, V. (2003) The struggle against neuromuscular diseases in France and the emergence of the ‘partnership model’ of patient organisation. Social Science & Medicine 57 (11): 2127–2136.
Reiger, K. (1999) Birthing in the postmodern moment: Struggles over defining maternity care needs. Australian Feminist Studies 14 (30): 387–404.
Reiger, K. (2000) Reconceiving citizenship: The challenge of mothers as political activists. Feminist Theory 1 (3): 309–327.
Reiger, K. and Dempsey, R. (2006) Performing birth in a culture of fear: An embodied crisis of late modernity. Heath Sociology Review 15 (4): 364–373.
Samerski, S. (2009) Genetic counselling and the fiction of choice: Taught self-determination as a new technique of social engineering. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34 (4): 735–761.
Sanderson, I. (2002) Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration 80 (1): 1–22.
Shaw, R. (2007) It’s your body, your baby, your birth’: Planning and achieving a home birth. Feminism Psychology 17 (4): 565–570.
Thoma, P. (2009) Buying up baby. Feminist Media Studies 9 (4): 409–425.
Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge MA, and London: The MIT Press.
Tong, R. (2007) Feminist through in transition: Never a dull moment. The Social Science Journal 44 (1): 23–39.
Trickey, H. and Newburn, M. (2014) Goals, dilemmas and assumptions in infant feeding education and support. Applying theory of constraints thinking tools to develop new priorities for action. Maternal and Child Nutrition 10 (1): 72–91.
Tyler, S. (2002) Comparing the campaigning profile of maternity user groups in Europe – Can we learn anything useful? Health Expectations 5 (2): 136–147.
Wagner, M. (1994) Pursuing the Birth Machine: The Search for Appropriate Birth Technology. New South Wales, Australia: Ace Graphics.
Wax, J.R., Lucas, F.L., Lamont, M., Pinette, M.G., Cartin, A. and Blackstone, J. (2010) Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: A metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 203 (243): e1–8.
Weiner, L.Y. (1994) Reconstructing motherhood: The La Leche League in postwar America. The Journal of American History 80 (4): 1357–1381.
Williamson, C. (2008) The patient movement as an emancipation movement. Health Expectations 11 (2): 102–112.
World Health Organisation (1996) Safe Motherhood. Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
World Health Organisation (1997) Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Zwelling, E. (2002) Activist for change: An interview with Suzanne Arms. Journal of Perinatal Education 11 (4): 11–24.
Acknowledgements
This article is based on a European research project called EPOKS (European Patients’ Organizations in Knowledge Society), supported by the European Commission FP7. We warmly thank all the organisations that participated in our research, and especially those members who agreed to be interviewed and let us participate as observers in different meetings. Etaoine Howlett, postdoctoral researcher at University College Cork, conducted interviews and undertook a range of research tasks relating to the Irish element of the study. The UK case study was undertaken by Imogen Tyler, Celia Roberts and Candice Satchwell. Interviews cited here were conducted by Candice Satchwell. We also thank the anonymous reviewers who helped us to significantly strengthen our argument.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akrich, M., Leane, M., Roberts, C. et al. Practising childbirth activism: A politics of evidence. BioSocieties 9, 129–152 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.5