Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valediction for Herbert Gottweis

  • Special Section
  • Published:
BioSocieties Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. These are summarized in an obituary published earlier this year (see Prainsack, 2014).

References

  • Braun, K., Herrmann, S.L. and Brekke, O.A. (2014) Sterilization policies, moral rehabilitation and the politics of amends. Critical Policy Studies 8 (2): 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. and Gottweis, H. (2013) Stem cell treatments in China: Rethinking the patient role in the global bio-economy. Bioethics 27 (4): 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Gottweis, H. and Starkbaum, J. (2013) Public perceptions of biobanks in China: A focus group study. Biopreservation and Biobanking 11 (5): 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds.) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing public policy. Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H. (eds.) (2012) The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge. In: C. Gordon (ed.) Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Brighton, UK: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (1995) German politics of genetic engineering and its deconstruction. Social Studies of Science 25 (2): 195–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (1998) Governing Molecules. The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (1998) Governing Molecules. The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (1998) Governing Molecules. The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (1998) Governing Molecules. The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2002) Stem cell policies in the United States and in Germany: Between bioethics and regulation. Policy Studies Journal 30 (4): 444–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2003) Theoretical strategies of post-structuralist policy analysis: Towards an analytics of government. In: M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (eds.) Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–265.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2006) Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos, and pathos. In: F. Fischer, G. Miller and M.S. Sidney (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. and Prainsack, B. (2006) Emotions in political discourse. Contrasting approaches to stem cell governance in the USA, UK, Israel and Germany. Regenerative Medicine 1 (6): 823–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2008) Biobanks in action: New strategies in the governance of life. In: H. Gottweis and A. Petersen (eds.) Biobanks. Governance in comparative perspective. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. et al (2008) Participation and the new governance of life. BioSocieties 3 (3): 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2008) Biobanks in action: new strategies in the governance of life. In: H. Gottweis and A. Petersen (eds.) Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. and Kim, B. (2009) Bionationalism, stem cells, BSE, and Web 2.0 in South Korea: Toward the reconfiguration of biopolitics. New Genetics and Society 28 (3): 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H., Salter, B. and Waldby, C. (2009) The Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. and Kim, B. (2010) Explaining Hwang-Gate: South Korean identity politics between bionationalism and globalization. Science, Technology and Human Values 35 (4): 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. and Gaskell, G. (2011) Biobanks need publicity. Nature 471 (7337): 159–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H., Gaskell, G. and Starkbaum, J. (2011) Connecting the public with biobank research: Reciprocity matters. Nature Reviews Genetics 12 (11): 738–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2012) Political rhetoric and stem cell policy in the United States: Embodiments, scenographies and emotions. In: H. Gottweis and F. Fischer (eds.) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press 211–235.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. (2012) Political rhetoric and stem cell policy. In: F. Fischer and H. Gottweis (eds.) The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 211–235.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H. and Lauss, G. (2012) Biobank governance: Heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization. Journal of Community Genetics 3 (2): 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottweis, H., Salter, B. and Waldby, C. (2009) The Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, K.C. (2010) ISCT white paper – cell therapy medical tourism: Time for action. Cytotherapy 12 (8): 965–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, C., Chen, H. and Gottweis, H. (2013) Unruly objects: Novel innovation paths and their regulatory challenge. In: A. Webster (ed.) The Global Dynamics of Regenerative Medicine. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 88–117.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1993) Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice. The case of acid rain in Great Britain. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 43–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Stem Cell Research (2008) Guidelines for the clinical translation of stem cells, www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/clin-trans-guidelines/isscrglclinicaltrans.pdf, accessed 29 July 2014.

  • Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life. The construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, LA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, O. and Hyun, I. (2009) Medical innovation versus stem cell tourism. Science 324 (5935): 1664–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A., Seear, K. and Munsie, M. (2014) Therapeutic journeys: The hopeful travails of stem cell tourists. Sociology of Health and Illness 36 (5): 670–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prainsack, B. (2014) Obituary for Herbert Gottweis. Life Sciences Society and Policy 10 (1): 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pülzl, H. (2010) Die Politik des Waldes. Wien, Austria: Böhlau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, I. (2010) The European Patent System. Shifts in Governance through Parliaments and Civil Society (Das Europäische Patentsystem. Wandel von Governance durch Parlamente und Zivilgesellschaft). Frankfurt and New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, I. (2013) Framing and explaining the politicization of intellectual property rights in the knowledge society. In: D. Beldiman (ed.) Access to Information and Knowledge. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar 208–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, I. (2014) The body, the law, and the market: Public policy implications in a liberal state. In: M. Albers and J. Reinhardt (eds.) Human Rights and Human Nature. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer 197–215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkbaum, J., Chen, H. and Gottweis, H. (2014) Publics and biobanks in China and Europe: A comparative perspective. Asia Europe Journal 12 (3): 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1996) How does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and Social Policy, School of Social & Political Sciences,, Room 167, A26 - R.C. Mills, The University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia

    Catherine Waldby

  2. Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine (SSHM), Health and Medicine (SSHM), King’s College London Strand, East Wing, Room 2.10, WC2R 2LS, London, UK

    Barbara Prainsack

  3. Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7/2, 1010 Wien/Vienna, Austria

    Christian Haddad

  4. Institute for Political Science, University of Hanover, Schneiderberg 50, D 30165, Hanover, Germany

    Kathrin Braun

  5. Universitaet Hamburg FSP BIOGUM (Centre for Biotechnology, Society and the Environment), Lottestr. 55D-, Hamburg, 22529, Germany

    Ingrid Schneider

  6. Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstr. 7/2, Vienna, 1010, Austria

    Ingrid Metzler

  7. Salzburg Centre of European Union Studies, Mönchsberg 2, Salzburg, A-5020, Austria

    Doris Wydra

  8. European Forest Institute – Central Eastern European Regional Office EFICEEC @ Institute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Policy, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Feistmantelstrasse 4, Vienna A-1180, Austria

    Helga Pülzl

  9. Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, Room S2.12, Strand Building, Strand Campus, WC2R 2LS, London, UK

    Brian Salter

  10. College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, 17 Tsinghua East Road, Beijing, 100083, China

    Haidan Chen

  11. School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    Alan Petersen

Authors
  1. Catherine Waldby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Prainsack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathrin Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ingrid Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ingrid Metzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Doris Wydra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Helga Pülzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Brian Salter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Haidan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alan Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Waldby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waldby, C., Prainsack, B., Haddad, C. et al. Valediction for Herbert Gottweis. BioSocieties 9, 457–480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.30

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.30

Search

Navigation