Skip to main content
Log in

Creating a clearly differentiated SME brand profile: The case of Montana A/S

  • Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business and academic literature frequently focuses on large companies and well-known brands. However, most businesses are actually small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that do not have the marketing budgets available to global giants such as Coca-Cola, NIKE or McDonald's. There is a need for owners and managers of SMEs to build strong brands that compete locally and globally, in both the short and long term. SME owners and managers could benefit enormously from a clear set of guidelines to help them develop a competitive brand and market position within their budgetary constraints. This paper demonstrates that, if correctly implemented, corporate branding really does work, and can be achieved within a limited marketing budget. This approach requires managers and owners to start thinking of branding as a long-term process that needs consistent, continuous communication to succeed. In this paper, we cite the example of a Danish furniture manufacturer, Montana A/S, but we strongly believe this case is applicable to many businesses worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Inskip, I. (2004) ‘Corporate branding for small to medium-sized businesses—A missed opportunity or an indulgence?’, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 11, No 5, pp. 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, D. W. and Perloff, J. M. (2000) ‘Modern Industrial Organization’, 3rd edn,Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

  • Stephen, M. (1994) ‘Industrial Economics’, 2nd edn,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • McAlister, L., Srinivasan, R. and MinChung, K. (2007) ‘Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 71, pp. 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ailawadi, K. L., Neslin, S. A. and Lehmann, D. R. (2003) ‘Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67, pp. 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A. and Zeithaml, V. A. (1993) ‘Advertising, perceived quality, and brand image’, in Aker, D. A. and Biel, A. L. (eds) ‘Brand Equity and Advertising’, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ, pp. 143–182.

  • Kaul, A. and Wittnk, D. R. (1995) ‘Empirical generalizations about the impact of advertising on price sensitivity and price’, Marketing Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montana A/S. (2007)Internal Analysis.

  • Akerlof, G. (1970) ‘The market for lemons. Quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 89, pp. 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G., Spence, M. and Stiglitz, J. (2001) ‘Markets with Asymmetric Information’, The prize in Economics 2001, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

  • Philip, N. (1970) ‘Information and consumer behavior’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, pp. 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R. and Steiner, P. (1954) ‘Optimal advertising and optimal quality’, American Economic Review, Vol. 44, pp. 826–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, J. (2002) ‘Unique Now or Never’, FT Prentice-Hall, UK.

  • Sicco, V. G. (2005) ‘The new imperatives for global branding: Strategy, creativity and leadership’, Brand Management, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesper, K. (2000) ‘Corporate Religion’, FT Prentice-Hall, UK.

  • Greene William, H. (2003) ‘Econometric Analysis’, 5th edn,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Philip, K. (1997) ‘Marketing Management’, Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Philip, N. (1974) ‘Advertising as information’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, pp. 729–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Animesh, A., Ramachandran, V. and Viswanathan, S. (2005) ‘Quality, Uncertainty and Adverse Selection in Sponsored Search Markets’, Working Paper 05-27, University of Maryland.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Montana's employees and Kunde & Co's consultants, analysts and creative staff for providing the data and insightful comments and ideas on which this work is based. A special thanks goes to Josephine Rosetzski and Pavel Kozin for research assistance. We thank Chris Sugrue, Ailish Kavanagh and Thomas Golzen for proofreading the manuscript and the comments from the editor and of two anonymous referees. Any errors are the authors'.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lassen, P., Kunde, J. & Gioia, C. Creating a clearly differentiated SME brand profile: The case of Montana A/S. J Brand Manag 16, 92–104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.24

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.24

Keywords

Navigation