Skip to main content
Log in

How participation is changing the practice of managing brands

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that branding is changing away from an organization-centric approach to one that is highly participative. The implication of this is that managers need to build networks of participation both internally with employees and externally with consumers and other stakeholders. This heightened connectivity helps bring employees and stakeholders together to develop new insights, create new experiences and reduce risk. The implication of this change is that organizations need to have a clear understanding of their brands, but also a willingness to create the conditions in which others can help mould it. Using illustrative examples of LEGO, Mozilla and adidas, the article shows how some organizations are embracing this spirit of openness, but it also points out that there are challenges in managing brands that have become more fluid and complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1996) Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free Press, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antorini, Y.M. (2007) Brand Community Innovation: An Intrinsic Case Study of The Adult Fans of LEGO Community. Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics, Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J., Whittome, J.R.M. and Brush, G.J. (2009) Investigating the service brand: A customer value perspective. Journal of Business Research 62 (3): 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmann, C., Zeplin, S. and Riley, N. (2009) Key determinants of internal brand management success: An exploratory empirical analysis. Journal of Brand Management 16 (4): 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B. and Dalli, D. (2010) Working consumers: The next step in marketing theory. Marketing Theory 9 (3): 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Kozinets, R.V. and Shankar, A. (eds.) (2007) Tribes, Inc.: The new world of tribalism. In: Consumer Tribes. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, R. (2000) Transmitting Culture. (Transmettre, 1997, Editions Odile Jacob). Translated by Eric Rauth New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L. and McDonald, M. (1998) Creating Powerful Brands, 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanda, M. (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London; New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vugt, G. (2010) Dare to edit: The politics of Wikipedia. Ephemera 10 (1): 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubroff, H. (2006) The implied covenant of good faith in contract interpretation and gap-filling: Reviling a revered relic. St. John’s Law Review 80 (2): 559–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. and Avery, J. (2011) The uninvited brand. Business Horizons 54 (3): 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, R., Peterson, M. and Koster, A. (2011) The rise of generation C, Strategy+Business p. 62.

  • Füller, J. (2010) Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review 52 (2): 98–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, B.D. and Rangarajan, D. (2014) Employee contributions to brand equity. California Management Review 56 (2): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2000) The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouillart, F.J. (2014) The race to implement co-creation of value with stakeholders: Five approaches to competitive advantage. Strategy & Leadership 42 (1): 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. (ed.) (1995) Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management. Frederick, Maryland: Beard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2011) Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory 11 (3): 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2007) We the people: The importance of employees in the process of building customer experience. Journal of Brand Management 15 (2): 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2008) Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies can Align Strategy, Culture and Identity Through Corporate Branding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2010) Towards a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance. Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemetsberger, A. (2014) There’s no passion; I need passion: Why some brands excite consumers so much. GfK Market Intelligence Review 6 (1): 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1969) A Treatise of Human Nature. Originally published 1739/1740 London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, O. and Bonet, E. (2012) Persuasive brand management: How managers can influence brand meaning when they are losing control over it. Journal of Organizational Change Management 25 (2): 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, O., Ind, N. and Alfaro, M. (2013) The organic view of the brand: A brand value co-creation model. Journal of Brand Management 20 (8): 670–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. (2001) Living the brand. In: How to Transform Every Member of Your Organization into A Brand Champion. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N., Fuller, C. and Trevail, C. (2012) Brand Together: How Co-Creation Generates Innovation and Re-Energizes Brands. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N., Iglesias, O. and Schultz, M. (2013) Building brands together. California Management Review 55 (3): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L., Aperia, T. and Georgson, M. (2008) Strategic Brand Management: A European Perspective. Harlow, UK: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C. and Grace, D. (2008) Internal branding: Exploring the employee’s perspective. Journal of Brand Management 15 (5): 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M. (2010) How brand communities influence innovation and culture. Market Leader Q3: 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M. (2010a) Brand Society: How Brands Transform Management and Lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, W.G. and Faulds, D.J. (2009) Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons 52 (4): 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morhart, F.M., Herzog, W. and Tomczak, T. (2009) Brand-specific leadership: Turning employees into brand champions. Journal of Marketing 73 (5): 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz, A.M. and O’Guinn, T.C. (2001) Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research 27 (March): 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. and Breen, B. (2013) Brick by Brick: How LEGO Rewrote the Rules of Innovation and Conquered the Global Toy Industry. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, D.J.G. and Roper, S. (2012) Exploring consumer brand name equity: Gaining insight through the investigation of response to name change. European Journal of Marketing 46 (7): 938–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M. and Hatch, M.J. (2003) The cycles of corporate branding. California Management Review 46 (1): 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin, H. (2006) Dirt! An interpretive study of negative opinions about a brand extension. In: K.M. Ekström and H. Brembeck (eds.) European Advances in Consumer Research. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin, H. (2012) The nature of a brand promise. In: N. Ind, C. Fuller and C. Trevail (eds.) Brand Together: How Co-Creation Generates Innovation and Re-Energizes Brands. London: Kogan Page, pp. 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. and Godfrey, P. (1998) Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: California Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2002) Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Ind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ind, N. How participation is changing the practice of managing brands. J Brand Manag 21, 734–742 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2014.35

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2014.35

Keywords

Navigation