Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the short-term spillover impact of a product recall on a brand ecosystem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the short-term impact of a product recall on a brand ecosystem by investigating the following questions: How do product recall spillover effects spread to (i) the recalled brand’s related product categories, (ii) competing brands, and (iii) private label brands? Studying the 2003 Land O‘Lakes butter recall case using a difference-in-differences model, our research shows that negative spillovers occur within the same brand family, carry over to private label brands and then quickly dissipate, but do not carry over to competitor brands. Managerial implications and directions for future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An ingredient brand is a branded material or component part that is contained within another branded product (see Kotler and Pfoertsch, 2010, or Keller, 2013, p 244).

  2. http://www.landolakesinc.com/business/default.aspx, accessed May 17, 2013.

  3. http://www.landolakesinc.com/businesses/FullStory/ECMD2-0016382, accessed June 17, 2015.

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (2004) Brand Portfolio Strategy: Creating Relevance, Differentiation, Energy, Leverage, and Clarity. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, R.H., Unnava, R. and Burnkrant, R.E. (2001) The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (4): 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachander, S. and Ghose, S. (2003) Reciprocal spillover effects: A strategic benefit of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birchall, J. (2010) Mattel recalls 11M products. Financial Times 23.

  • Bronnenberg, B.J., Kruger, M.W. and Mela, C.F. (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Science 27 (4): 745–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. and Krueger, A.B. (1994) Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review 84 (4): 772–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Ganesan, S. and Liu, Y. (2009) Does a firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. Journal of Marketing 73 (6): 214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleeren, K., Dekimpe, M.G. and Helsen, K. (2008) Weathering product-harm crises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 36 (2): 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleeren, K., van Heerde, H.J. and Dekimpe, M.G. (2013) Rising from the ashes: How brands and categories can overcome product-harm crises. Journal of Marketing 77 (2): 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M. and Lange, F. (2006) A disaster is contagious: How a brand in crisis affects other brands. Journal of Advertising Research 46 (4): 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, B., Dhanasobhon, S., Smith, M.D. and Telang, R. (2010) Converting pirates without cannibalizing purchasers: The impact of digital distribution on physical sales and internet piracy. Marketing Science 29 (6): 1138–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, B., Dhanasobhon, S., Smith, M.D. and Telang, R. (2013) Understanding Media Markets in the Digital Age: Economics and Methodology. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper No. w19634.

  • Darke, P.R., Ashworth, L. and Main, K.J. (2010) Great expectations and broken promises: Misleading claims, product failure, expectancy disconfirmation, and consumer distrust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38 (3): 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.W. (2005) The effect of health risk on housing values: Evidence from a cancer cluster. American Economic Review 94 (5): 1693–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N. and Pillutla, M.M. (2000) Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research 37 (2): 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, C. (2012) Surge in products being recalled may be numbing consumers. USA Today 10 June.

  • Feldman, J.M. and Lynch, J.G. (1988) Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (3): 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., Knight, J.G., Zhang, H., Mather, D. and Tan, L.P. (2012) Consumer scapegoating during a systemic product-harm crisis. Journal of Marketing Management 28 (11–12): 1270–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, P.M. (1989) Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (1): 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janakiraman, R., Sismeiro, C. and Dutta, S. (2009) Perception spillovers across competing brands: A disaggregate model of how and when. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (4): 467–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, D.R., Loken, B. and Joiner, C. (1998) The negative impact of extensions: Can flagship products be diluted? Journal of Marketing 62 (1): 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (2013) Strategic Brand Management, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Pfoertsch, W. (2010) Ingredient Branding: Making the Invisible Visible. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, D. and Coombs, W.T. (2006) How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues. Business Horizons 49 (5): 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, J., Dawar, N. and Lemmink, J. (2008) Negative spillover in brand portfolios: Exploring the antecedents of asymmetric effects. Journal of Marketing 72 (3): 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeflang, P.S.H., Wittink, D.R., Wedel, M. and Naert, P.A. (2000) Building Models for Marketing Decisions. International Series in Quantitative Marketing Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (1995) Natural and Quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13 (2): 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, M. and Haunschild, P.R. (2006) The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science 17 (1): 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehm, M.L. and Tybout, A.M. (2006) When will a brand scandal spill over, and how should competitors respond? Journal of Marketing Research 43 (3): 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S., Jang, S.S., Almanza, B., Miao, L. and Behnke, C. (2013) The impact of food safety events on the value of food-related firms: An event study approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management 33: 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S., Jang, S.S., Almanza, B., Miao, L. and Behnke, C. (2014) The negative spillover effect of food crises on restaurant firms: Did Jack in the box really recover from an E. coli scare? International Journal of Hospitality Management 39: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B. (2010) Latest Toyota recall affects 1.1M vehicles across the US and Canada. Financial Times 16.

  • Simonin, B.L. and Ruth, J.A. (1998) Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 35 (1): 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siomkos, G.J. and Kurzbard, G. (1994) The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management. European Journal of Marketing 28 (2): 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siomkos, G.J., Triantafillidou, A., Vassilikopoulou, A. and Tsiamis, I. (2010) Opportunities and threats for competitors in product-harm crises. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 28 (6): 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souiden, N. and Pons, F. (2009) Product recall crisis management: The impact on manufacturer’s image, consumer loyalty and purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management 18 (2): 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M.W. (1990) Measuring image spillovers in umbrella-branded products. Journal of Business 63 (3): 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84 (4): 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Gati, I. (1978) Studies of similarity. In: E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heerde, H., Helsen, K. and Dekimpe, M.G. (2007) The impact of a product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Science 26 (2): 230–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the JBM reviewers for their constructive comments and recommendations. The authors also wish to acknowledge the valuable feedback given to them in the early versions of this article by Demetrios Vakratsas, Jui Ramaprasad, and Omar Toulan, professors from the Desautels Faculty of Management at McGill University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correction

This paper has been corrected online: 21 July 2015 Please visit the corrigendum for details: doi:10.1057/bm.2015.23

Appendices

Appendix A

Land O’ Lakes press release

Voluntary Recall of LAND O’ LAKES® Salted Stick Butter In One-Pound Packages.

ARDEN HILLS, Minnesota, 27 July /PRNewswire/ – Land O’Lakes Inc. today initiated a voluntary recall of approximately 3500 cases of LAND O’ LAKES® Salted Stick Butter in one-pound packages because it may contain small fragments of metal. There have been no reports of injury or illness associated with the consumption of the product covered by this recall.

The affected product was distributed in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The product was sold to consumers in retail grocery stores between June 11, 2003, and July 27, 2003.

The recalled product potentially affected has one of the following production codes:

    (Date) KE 107P

    (Date) KE 108P

    (Date) KE 109P

The code can be found above the Nutrition Facts on the package.

The voluntary recall is only for the product with the production codes noted above. No other butter products or production codes or any other LAND O’ LAKES® products are part of this voluntary recall.

‘We are initiating this precautionary recall because the safety and health of our consumers are our first concern,’ said Jack Gherty, Land O’Lakes president and chief executive officer. ‘We’re working with the FDA to ensure any product that has not yet been consumed is removed from the marketplace and consumers’ homes as quickly as possible.’

All the product was produced at Land O’Lakes Kent, Ohio, manufacturing facility.

Consumers who have purchased LAND O’LAKES® Salted Stick Butter in one-pound packages with one of these production codes are asked to return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company toll-free at 1-877-585-2365 or visit our website at www.landolakes.com/ for further information.

Website: www.landolakes.com/

Appendix B

Graphical representation of states affected by the Land O’Lakes butter recall

States affected by the recall: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

illustration

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mackalski, R., Belisle, JF. Measuring the short-term spillover impact of a product recall on a brand ecosystem. J Brand Manag 22, 323–339 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.19

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.19

Keywords

Navigation