Abstract
This paper uses a case study of Facebook to examine the potential use of social networking sites (SNS) for political advantage. Drawing upon contemporary surveillance studies and information technology approaches, it aims to provide insights from these for the study of British politics. The paper uses a model of a constituency election to show the ease and effects of SNS data-mining in support of political campaigning. In doing so, it examines the political implications of machine readable personal data, the design of information systems, and the problems of inductive heuristics and social sorting.
Notes
For newer versions of this software, used to produce the images contained within this paper, please contact the authors.
References
6, P. (2005) The personal information economy: Trends and prospects for customers. In: S. Lace, (ed.) The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society. Bristol: Policy Press.
Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing and privacy on the Facebook. The 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Robinson College, The University of Cambridge, 28 June.
Baggini, J. and Fosl, P.S. (2003) The Philosopher's Toolkit: A Compendium of Philosophical Concepts and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell.
Balfanz, D., Durfee, G., Grinter, R.E., Smetters, D.K. and Stewart, P. (2004) Network-in-a-Box: How to Set Up a Secure Wireless Network in Under a Minute, In: Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium; 9–13 August, San Diego, California, pp. 207–222.
Balls, E. (2009) Safeguarding. Department for Children, Schools and Families, http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/_files/DCSF_ContactPoint_WMS_26_Jan_09.pdf.
Bellamy, C., 6, P. and Raab, C. (2005) Personal data in the public sector: Reconciling necessary sharing with confidentiality. In: S. Lacey (ed.) The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society. Bristol: National Consumer Council and Policy Press.
Clarke, R. (1991) Information technology and dataveillance. In: C. Dunlop and R. Kling (eds.) Controversies in Computing. San Diego: Academic Press.
Deleuze, G. (2002) Postscript on control societies. In: T. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) [CTRL] Space: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Cambrige, MA and London: MIT Press.
Donath, J. and Boyd, D. (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal 22 (4): 71–82.
Electoral Commission. (2005) Election 2005: Turnout. How Many, Who and Why? London: The Electoral Commission.
Evans, M. (2005) The data informed marketing model and its social responsibility. In: S. Lace (ed.) The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Facebook. (2007) Facebook privacy policy, http://www.facebook.com/policy.php, accessed 24 May.
Gandy, O.H. (1996) Coming to terms with the panoptic sort. In: D. Lyon and E. Zureik (eds.) Computers, Surveillance, Privacy. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
Garfinkel, S. (2001) Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century. Sebastepol: O’Reilly publications.
Goodin, D. (2007) How to sniff out private information on facebook. The Register, 26 June, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/26/sniffing_private_facebook_info/.
Haggerty, K.D. and Ericson, R.V. (2000) The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.
Hardey, M. (2007) Going live: Converging mobile technology and the sociability of the iGeneration. Media-Culture 10 (1). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0703/09-hardeg.php.
Jones, H. and Soltren, J.H. (2005) Facebook: Threats to privacy. Student term paper, MIT, 14 December, http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/6.805/student-papers/fall05-papers/student-papers.html.
Lyon, D. (2003) Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies. In: D. Lyon (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination. London and New York: Routledge.
Lyon, D. (2007) Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity.
MarketingWeek. (2008) Perils of political fundraising. MarketingWeek, 29 October, www.marketingweek.co.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=63082.
Murakami Wood, D. (ed.) (2006) A report on the surveillance society: For the information commissioner by the surveillance studies network, http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/surveillance_society_full_report_2006.pdf.
Noon, M. and Delbirge, R. (1993) News from behind my hand: Gossip in Organizations. Organization Studies 14 (1): 23–36.
O’Hara, K. and Stevens, D. (2006) Inequality.com: Power, Poverty and the Digital Divide. Oxford: Oneworld.
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (2009) POSTnote 321: E-Democracy, www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_offices/post/pubs2009.cfm.
Privacy International. (2007) Consultation report: Race to the bottom, http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/internet/interimrankings.pdf.
Suchman, L.A. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human/Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wills, D.A. (2008) The United Kingdom identity card scheme: Shifting motivations, static technologies. In: C. Bennett and D. Lyon (eds.) Playing the Identity Card: Surveillance, Security and Identification in Global Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wills, D., Reeves, S. Facebook as a political weapon: Information in social networks. Br Polit 4, 265–281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2009.3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2009.3