Skip to main content
Log in

Heirs to Blair's third way? David Cameron's triangulating conservatism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article examines the ideological direction of the Conservative Party under the leadership of David Cameron. In so doing, comparisons are made between the rhetoric, discourse and ideology of Cameron and that employed by New Labour, in particular the ‘third way’ perspective which was strongly associated with Tony Blair. The first section analyses the Conservative leadership's attempts to ideologically position the party, highlighting strong similarities with the narratives and techniques used by new Labour. It argues that Cameron's rhetoric mirrors New Labour's efforts to create an inclusive discourse that transcends traditional political dividing lines. The second section of the article investigates to what extent such efforts at political ‘triangulation’ may be underpinned by distinct philosophical positions. Again, comparisons are drawn with the ‘third way’ ideology of New Labour. However, it is suggested that it may be misleading to speak of a new ideological consensus in British politics, particularly given the Cameron leadership's expressed antipathy to the state and self-styled approach to promoting ‘social justice’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A similar narrative of the post-war period as being divided by a consensus between 1945 and the 1970s, followed by a Thatcherite revolution in the 1980s has also become the orthodoxy in textbooks on British politics (Kerr, 2001).

  2. Osborne also quotes Gordon Brown when he was Shadow Chancellor, arguing that budget deficits ultimately harm the very people progressives are trying to help (Osborne, 2009).

  3. In a review of the first edition of O’Hara's book, the then backbencher David Cameron described the book as ‘compelling’ and offering a ‘road map for a sustained conservative recovery’ (Cameron, 2005).

  4. It is worth noting that in Giddens’ formulation of the third way, he posits ‘philosophical conservatism’ as a guiding principle, arguing for the need to preserve local cultures, certain traditions and the environment even when engaging in broader modernisation (Giddens, 1998, p. 68).

  5. The Conservative Public Services Improvement Group published the 2007 report – Restoring Faith in Our Public Services.

  6. Indeed such a view seems echoed in David Cameron's own conception of social justice: ‘Labour think that social justice principally means equality, achieved and guaranteed by government. We think it means community, built and maintained by people themselves’ (Cameron, 2006a).

  7. Oborne argues that Cameron is torn between two tendencies: (i) a modernising tendency to drive change from the centre and; (ii) an inherited scepticism about the functions of the state (2009, p. xii). One can certainly argue that there is a perfomative tension between Cameron-Osborne's highly centralised approach to managing the Conservative Party and their broader pledge to decentralise power.

  8. The book has sparked interest in different parts of the political spectrum, including the Obama administration in the United States. Thaler himself supports the Democrats.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAnulla, S. Heirs to Blair's third way? David Cameron's triangulating conservatism. Br Polit 5, 286–314 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2010.10

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2010.10

Keywords

Navigation