Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article re-examines the utility of the idea of ‘fifth nation’ as a way of conceptualising the contemporary United Kingdom. The term appeared first in published form in the introduction by Peter Madgwick and Richard Rose to their jointly edited book, The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics (1982). There, Madgwick and Rose thought that ‘the United Kingdom is a fifth “nation” in Westminster’. In Understanding the United Kingdom published in the same year, Rose provided a different stress: Parliament ‘is, as it were, the fifth nation of the United Kingdom’. It is the argument of this article that ‘fifth nation’ still captures an important truth about the United Kingdom, but that devolution involves a shift in emphasis from the definite to the indefinite article. The first part of this article considers the character of the United Kingdom as the fifth nation as Rose (and others) defined it. The second part considers how devolution challenges the comprehension of that idea. The final, and more speculative, part suggests that to understand the United Kingdom in some respects as a fifth nation may be more appropriate in contemporary circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aughey, A. (2001) Nationalism, Devolution and the Challenge to the United Kingdom State. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aughey, A. (2007) The Politics of Englishness. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1927) National Character and the Factors in its Formation. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2010) Salmond letter to new PM Cameron, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8677768.stm, accessed 11 May 2010.

  • Bogdanor, V. (2008) Review. Parliamentary Affairs 61 (2): 409–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (2009) The New British Constitution. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. (2005) Union and Devolution: Territorial Politics in the United Kingdom Under Thatcher and Blair. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. (2006) Territory and power revisited: Theorising territorial politics in the United Kingdom after devolution. Political Studies 54: 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2009) Introduction. In: M. D’Ancona (ed.) Being British: The Search for the Values that Bind the Nation. Edinburgh, UK: Mainstream Publishing, pp. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulpitt, J. (1983) Territory and Power in the United Kingdom, An Interpretation, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (1996) Nationhood and Political Theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, P., Knox, C. and Osborne, R. (2007) Devolution and Constitutional Change in Northern Ireland. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Scottish Devolution. (2009) Serving Scotland better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st century, http://www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk/uploads/2009-06-12-csd-final-report-2009fbookmarked.pdf, accessed 19 June 2009.

  • Crick, B. (1998) The decline of political thinking in British public life. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1): 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J. (2006) A stronger or weaker union? Public reactions to asymmetric devolution in the United Kingdom. Publius 36 (1): 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J. (2008) Where Stands the Union Now? Lessons from the 2007 Scottish Parliament Election. London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J. and Seyd, B. (eds.) (2009) Has Devolution Worked?: The Verdict from Policymakers and the Public. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicey, A.V. (1973) England's Case against Home Rule. London: The Richmond Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, C. (2006) Speech to ESRC devolution and constitutional change programme. Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London, 10 March, http://www.dca.gov.uk/speeches/2006/sp060310.htm, accessed 3 June 2006.

  • Fenton, S. (2007) Indifference towards national identity: What young adults think about being English and British. Nations and Nationalism 13 (2): 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. (2007) The fragile divergence machine: Citizenship, health policy and devolution. In: A. Trench (ed.) Intergovernmental Relations in the United Kingdom. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 136–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haesly, J. (2005) Rue Britannia or rule Britannia? British identities in Scotland and Wales. Ethnopolitics 4 (1): 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R. (2000) Conclusion: The state of the nations after one year of devolution. In: R. Hazell (ed.) The State of the Nations: The First Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R. (2006) Conclusion: What are the answers to the English question? In: R. Hazell (ed.) The English Question. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 220–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R. (2008) Conclusion: Where will the Westminster model end up? In: R. Hazell (ed.) Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain's Constitution to 2020. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, pp. 285–300.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. and Roberts, J. (2008) British identity: Its sources and possible implications for civic attitudes and behaviour, http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/british-identity.pdf, accessed 7 June 2009.

  • Hough, D. and Jeffrey, C. (2006) Devolution and Electoral Politics. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, D. (2007) cited in V. Bogdanor, The quiet revolution. The House Magazine, 2 March, 2007 at http://epolitix.com/EN?Publications/House/1208_32/ce342dal-67e5-498c-b4d6-d3, accessed 27 May 2009.

  • Jeffery, C. (2009) Devolution in the UK: Problems of a piecemeal approach to constitutional change. Publius 39 (2): 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. (2001) Taking stock of constitutional reform. Government and Opposition 36 (3): 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. and Keating, M. (1985) Labour and the British State. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1998) What's wrong with asymmetrical government? Regional and Federal Studies 8 (1): 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2009) The Independence of Scotland: Self-government and the Shifting Politics of Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. and McEwen, N. (2006) Devolution and Public Policies. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellas, J. and Madgwick, P. (1982) Territorial ministries: The Scottish and Welsh offices. In: P. Madgwick and R. Rose (eds.) The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics. London: Macmillan, pp. 9–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, A. (2008) Review. Parliamentary Affairs 61: 546–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (2007) The British Constitution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsnorth, P. (2008) Real England: The Battle Against the Bland. London: Portobello Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2007) Best for Britain? The Politics and Legacy of Gordon Brown. Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madwick, P. and Rose, R. (1982) Introduction. In: P. Madgwick and R. Rose (eds.) The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics. London: Macmillan, pp. 1–5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1995) On Nationality. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, especially chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2006) Devolution's unfinished business. The Political Quarterly 77 (4): 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2007) The United Kingdom as a state of unions: Unity of government, equality of political rights and diversity of institutions. In: A. Trench (ed.) Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 24–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2009) Devolution in the UK. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paun, A. (2008) Lost souls in the lobbies?’ Backbenchers from Scotland and Wales in post-devolution Westminster. In: A. Trench (ed.) The State of the Nations 2008. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perryman, M. (ed.) (2008) Imagined Nation: England after Britain. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterkin, T. (2010) Cameron pledges to govern Scotland with ‘respect’. The Scotsman, 13 May http://www.scotsman.com/news/David-Cameron-pledges-to-govern.6291122.jp, accessed 13 May.

  • Rawlings, R. (2003) Delineating Wales: Constitutional, Legal and Administrative Aspects of National Devolution. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. and Urwin, D. (eds.) (1982) The Politics of Territorial Identity: Studies in European Regionalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1982a) Understanding the United Kingdom: The Territorial Dimension in Government. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1982b) Is the United Kingdom a state? Northern Ireland as a case study. In: P. Madgwick and R. Rose (eds.) The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics. London: Macmillan, pp. 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M. and Hazell, R. (2000) Devolution and Westminster: Tentative steps towards a more federal parliament. In: R. Hazell (ed.) The State of the Nations: The First Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, M. (2002) What place for England in an asymmetrically devolved UK? Regional Studies 36 (7): 789–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seton-Watson, H. (1979) History. In: C. Maclean (ed.) The Crown and the Thistle: The Nature of Nationhood. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press, pp. 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, S. (2007) Giving with one hand: Scottish devolution within a unitary state. International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (4): 730–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2004) Introduction: Has devolution made a difference? In: A. Trench (ed.) Has Devolution made a Difference? The State of the Nations 2004. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2005a) Introduction: The dynamics of devolution. In: A. Trench (ed.) The Dynamics of Devolution; the State of the Nations 2005. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2005b) Intergovernmental relations within the UK. In: A. Trench (ed.) The Dynamics of Devolution: The State of the Nations 2005. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (ed.) (2007) Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2008) Introduction: The second phase of devolution. In: A. Trench (ed.) The State of the Nations 2008. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, E. (2006) The Evolution of a Constitution: Eight Key Moments in British Constitutional History. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of a Leverhulme Trust Major Research Fellowship in the writing of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminology, Politics and Social Policy, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Jordanstown, BT37 0QB, UK

    Arthur Aughey

Authors
  1. Arthur Aughey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aughey, A. Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles. Br Polit 5, 265–285 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2010.8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2010.8

Keywords

Search

Navigation