Skip to main content
Log in

UK party leaders are ‘preeminent’, but can also be ‘predominant’: Cameron and the Conservatives, 2005–2010

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

The power of the party leader, because it is such a moveable feast, is hard to measure, understand or theorise. This article, using Cameron’s leadership of the Conservative party in opposition as a case study, contends that the modern party leader (singular) can play by far the leading role within their party and parliamentary leadership (plural). Opposition party leaders have the potential to be powerful (that is they will be ‘preeminent’) because they (1) lead the ‘shadow government’; (2) have the right of proposal and veto over party policy and electoral strategy; (3) have a powerful private office which is able to lead and direct the party both within and without parliament; and (4) control the party’s ‘official’ news media operation, which can represent the leader’s policy preferences as the party’s policy preferences. But the preeminent leader will be considerably empowered (that is, they will become ‘predominant’) when they possess and make use of four personal power resources (and they will be disempowered if they do not): (1) having a reputation for being ‘leadership material’; (2) being associated with actual or anticipated political success; (3) being electorally popular; and (4) having a high standing in his or her parliamentary party. Under certain contextual circumstances the modern electoral professional, office-seeking UK party leader can be both preeminent and predominant. Even if they lack the entirely free hand to do whatever they want, such a party leader will ‘lead’, not simply ‘follow’ their party. The leadership style of Cameron, building upon that of Thatcher and Blair, was not his singular invention, but rather a reaction to and a trend-setter of far-reaching transformations wrought in the form of the UK political party.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bale, T. (2008) A bit less bunny hugging and a bit more bunny boiling? Qualifying conservative party change under David Cameron. British Politics 3 (3): 270–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T. (2009) Cometh the hour, cometh the Dave: How far is the conservative party’s revival all down to David Cameron. Political Quarterly 18 (2): 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T. (2010) The Conservative Party from Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T. and Webb, P. (2011) The conservative party. In: N. Allen and J. Bartle (eds.) Britain at The Polls 2010. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2007) ‘Cameron steps up grammar’s attack’, 22 May, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6679005.stm.

  • Blair, T. (2007) Speech on Public Life and the Media, 6th June, http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKZWE24585220070612.

  • Blair, T. (2010) The Journey. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2010) The Alastair Campbell Diaries: Volume One Prelude to Power. London: Hutchingson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2003) Margaret Thatcher: Volume Two – The Iron Lady. London: Jonathin Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Webb, P. (2012) Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2011) Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 21 (2): 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J. (2009) Back in contention? The conservatives’ electoral prospects. Political Quarterly 80 (2): 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H. and Mair, P. (eds.) (1983) Western European Party Systems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M. (2002) Parties Without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A. and O’Hara, K. (2007) Cameron’s ‘mandate’: Democracy, legitimacy and conservative leadership. Parliamentary Affairs 60 (3): 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. (2008) Consigning its past to history? David Cameron and the conservative party. Parliamentary Affairs 62 (2): 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. (2011) ‘George Osborne grows up’, ConservativeHome, 28 July, http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2011/07/george-osborne-grows-up.html#tp.

  • Gould, P. (1998) The Unfinished Revolution: How the Modernisers Saved the Labour Party. London: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, E. (2010) Alastair Campbell: ‘I want my kids to think I've been a good dad’, Daily Telegraph, 3 February, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/7139496/Alastair-Campbell-I-want-my-kids-to-think-Ive-been-a-good-dad.html.

  • Gunther, R., Montero, J.R. and Linz, J. (eds.) (2002) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, R. (2003) Prime ministerial predominance? Core executive politics in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (3): 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, R. (2005) Exploring (and explaining) the prime minister. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4): 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, R. (2006) The prime minister and the news media: Political communication as a leadership resource. Parliamentary Affairs 59 (3): 582–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, R. (2009) Political parties. In: M. Flinders, and A. Gamble, C. Hay and M. Kenny (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, R. (2013) There’s no need for the -ization: The prime minister is merely prime ministerial. Parliamentary Affairs, forthcoming.

  • Heppell, T. and Hill, M. (2009) Transcending thatcherism? Ideology and the conervative party leadership mandate of David Cameron. Political Quarterly 80 (3): 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, G. (2006) Charles Kennedy: A Tragic Flaw. London: Politicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2008) Cameron on Cameron. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. and Mair, P. (2002) The ascendancy of the party in public office: Party organisational change in twentieth century democracies. In: R. Gunther, J.R. Montero and J. Linz (eds.) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D. and Cowley, P. (2010) The British General Election of 2010. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, R. (2007) Politics and the Media in Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, D. (2010) Twenty Two Days in May. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelson, P. (2010) The Third Man: Life at the Heart of New Labour. London: HarperPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C. (2008) ‘David Cameron: The UK’s next leader?’ Time, 11 September, http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1840461-2,00.html#ixzz0gYY8T23s.

  • Montgomerie, T. (2011) ‘The New 10 Downing Street’, http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2011/02/the-new-10-downing-street.html#t.

  • Mughan, A. (2009) Partisan dealignment, party attachments and leader effects. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19 (4): 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W. and Strøm, K. (ed.) (1999) Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (2011) ‘Osborne’s long game’, Financial Times, 19 March.

  • Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (eds.) (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, P. (2010) Back from the Brink: The Inside Story of the Tory Resurrection. London: Harper Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. (1996) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences. Westport, CT: The Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, N. (2011) ‘George Osborne - The man who would be prime minister’, The Observer, 27 November, http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/nov/27/george-osborne-chancellor-prime-minister.

  • Webb, P. (2004) Party responses to the changing electoral market in Britain. In: P. Mair, W.C. Muller and F. Plasser (eds.) Political Parties and Electoral Change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heffernan, R. UK party leaders are ‘preeminent’, but can also be ‘predominant’: Cameron and the Conservatives, 2005–2010. Br Polit 9, 51–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2013.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2013.16

Keywords

Navigation