Skip to main content
Log in

Intergovernmental relations in German federalism: Cooperative federalism, party politics and territorial conflicts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Since the late 1970s, but especially since Unification in 1990, the German federal system has come under considerable stress. On the one hand, party competition is increasingly played out through the Bundesrat, the body representing the Länder governments at the federal level, making intergovernmental coordination more difficult and leading to accusations of ‘Reformstau’ (reform log jam). On the other hand, Unification not only added five new Länder to the system, but also led to economic disparities between the Länder at a hitherto unknown level, and deepened territorial conflicts over Länder competencies and the allocation of finances. Both developments have led to demands for a reform of the federal structure aimed at disentangling joint policymaking structures to ensure greater autonomy for both the federal level and the Länder. However, as the article will argue, the developments have resulted in a triangular constellation of interests between the federal level, the richer and the poorer Länder that makes reforming the system almost impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the 2006 and 2009 federal reforms see below.

  2. Electoral Alternative for Employment and Social Justice (Wahlalternative für Arbeit und soziale Gerechtigkeit).

  3. So far, the SPD has not embraced the Left List as a viable coalition partner due to the unease in the West regarding the historical baggage of the PDS, but also due to inter-party animosities since a number of Left List party members in the West are former SPD members including former Left List co-chairman Oscar Lafontaine.

  4. If the new and first Green Minister President, Winfried Kretschmann of Baden-Württemberg, does not remain a ‘one hit wonder’, MPK and Bundesrat may have to organise ‘G’ meetings as well.

  5. Decisions in the Bundesrat are always based on ‘positive’ questions, that is, ‘who votes for the bill’ for consent laws and ‘who objects to the bill?’ for all other laws.

  6. This number does not, of course, take into account consent bills that are never introduced because the government fears that they might be watered down too much or not pass the Bundesrat at all.

  7. The only really important amendments concerned the distribution of the Länder votes in the Bundesrat, the involvement of the Länder in EU policymaking and the amendment to Article 72 granting the Bund concurrent powers on the basis of a ‘necessity’ rather than a mere ‘need’ for the establishment of equivalent living conditions. In addition, the Court was given explicit jurisdiction in disputes over the new ‘clause of necessity’ (Article 93 (1) GG), thus forcing it to abandon its ‘political question theory’.

  8. For a critical discussion of this view see Auel 2010.

  9. For the reform process as well as the outcome see Moore and Wade, 2008.

  10. Hunting, nature conservation and landscape management, land distribution, spatial planning, management of water resources and higher education (both admission and degrees).

References

  • Agranoff, R. (2004) Autonomy, devolution, and intergovernmental relations. Regional and Federal Studies 14 (1): 26–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. (2008) Still no exit from the joint decision trap. The German federal reform(s). German Politics 17 (4): 424–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. (2010) Between Reformstau and Länder strangulation? German co-operative federalism re-considered. Federal & Regional Studies 20 (2): 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (1999) From unitary to asymmetric federalism in Germany: Taking stock after 50 years. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29 (4): 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2007) Inter-regional competition in co-operative federalism: New modes of multi-level governance in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies 17 (4): 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, S. and Manow, P. (2006) Veto-Antizipation Gesetzgebung im deutschen Bikameralismus. Berlin: MPIfG Discussion Paper 06/3.

  • Detterbeck, K. (2009) Föderalismus in Deutschland. München, Germany: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detterbeck, K. and Renzsch, W. (2008) Symmetrien und Asymmetrien im bundesstaatlichen Parteienwettbewerb. In: U. Jun, M. Haas and O. Niedermayer (eds.) Parteien und Parteiensysteme in den deutschen Ländern. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 39–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Große-Sender, H.A. (ed.) (1990) Bericht der Kommission “Erhaltung und Fortentwicklung der bundesstaatlichen Ordnung innerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – auch in einem Vereinten Europa”, part 1, Düsseldorf, Germany: Landtag NRW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessischer Landtag. (1981) Drs. 9/6806: Antwort des Ministerpräsidenten-Staatskanzlei auf die Kleine Anfrage des Abg. Milde (CDU) betreffend Beteiligung des Landes Hessen an überregionalen Gremien, Drs. 9/6422.

  • Jeffery, C. (1999a) Party politics and territorial representation in the federal republic of Germany. West European Politics 22 (2): 130–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. (ed.) (1999b) From cooperative federalism to a ‘Sinatra Doctrine’ of the Länder? In: Recasting German Federalism: The Legacies of Unification. London: Pinter, pp. 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. (2005) Federalism: The new territorialism. In: S. Green and W.E. Paterson (eds.) Governance in Contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. (2008) Groundhog day: The non-reform of German federalism, again. German Politics 17 (4): 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisker, G. (1989) Federalism and intergovernmental relations in west Germany: A fortieth year appraisal. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 19 (4): 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kommers, D.P. (1994) The federal constitutional court in the German political system. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 470–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, S. (2004) Gerhard Schröder as ‘Coordination Chancellor’: The impact of institutions and arenas on the chancellor’s style of governance. In: W. Reutter (ed.) Germany on the Road to Normalcy. Policies and Politics of the Red-Green Federal Government (1998–2002). New York: Palgrave Macmillan 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, S. (2010) Kooperativer Föderalismus und Politikverflechtung. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krug, P. and Herrmann, G. (2010) Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). In R. Arnold, S. Nolda and E. Nuissl (eds.) Wörterbuch Erwachsenenbildung. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt, online edition, http://www.wb-erwachsenenbildung.de.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (2000 [1976]) Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat: Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im Politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 1st edn. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardy, U. (2002) Parteien im Föderalismus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Scharniere zwischen Staat und Politik. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (ZParl) 33 (1): 180–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. and Wade, J. (eds.) (2008) German federalism in transition. Special issue of German Politics 17 (4).

  • Renzsch, W. (1991) Finanzverfassung und Finanzausgleich. Die Auseinandersetzung um ihre politische Gestaltung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zwischen Währungsreform und deutscher Vereinigung (1948 bis 1990). Bonn, Germany: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1988) The joint-decision trap. Public Administration 66 (3): 239–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (2006) The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal for Common Market Studies 44 (4): 845–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W., Reissert, B. and Schnabel, F. (1976) Politikverflechtung. Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik. Kronberg/Ts., Germany: Scriptor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L. (2003) Intergovernmental Councils in Federations, Constructive or Co-operative Federalism? Working Paper No. 2, IIGR Montreal: Queen’s University.

  • Zimmer, C. (2010) Politikkoordination im deutschen Bundesstaat: Wandel in den Arbeitsstrukturen? Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 41 (3): 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Auel, K. Intergovernmental relations in German federalism: Cooperative federalism, party politics and territorial conflicts. Comp Eur Polit 12, 422–443 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.13

Keywords

Navigation