Skip to main content
Log in

UK devolution in the shadow of hierarchy? Intergovernmental relations and party politics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article looks at the dynamics of intergovernmental relations (IGR) in the context of UK devolution and how these have been affected by the more widespread occurrence of party incongruence since 2007. As predicted by the hypotheses in the introduction to this special issue, we first show how the asymmetric design of devolution is conducive to bilateral and weakly institutionalised IGR, and how the asymmetric design of UK devolution has been perpetuated since devolution was implemented in 1999. Yet, although devolution (unlike federalism) implies a constitutional hierarchy between levels, in the second part of the article we demonstrate that UK governments have used their constitutional muscle with some restraint, in part for fear of losing electoral support and legitimacy among their electorates. Finally, although the absence of wide-scale intergovernmental conflict in the face of party incongruence is consistent with the third hypothesis of the introduction, we argue that this is not simply the result of the devolved state alone, but also of other institutional features and the presence of political context in which neither the UK government nor the devolved governments would benefit from a path that prioritises intergovernmental conflict over cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Good Friday Agreement – also known as the Belfast Agreement – was endorsed by most of the political parties in Northern Ireland (excluding the Democratic Unionist Party) and incorporated an international treaty agreement between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Among other matters relating to the peace process and the cessation of armed conflict, it set out the principles upon which devolution would work, and recognised the legitimacy of both the unionist desire to remain within the United Kingdom and the nationalist goal of a united Ireland.

References

  • AWCR. (2009) All Wales Convention Report. All Wales Convention, November.

  • BBC. (1 October 2009) Morgan’s bumpy path to the top, by Phil Parry, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8257363.stm.

  • Birrell, J. (2012) Intergovernmental relations and political parties in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Politics and Intergovernmental Relations 14 (2): 270–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (1979) Devolution, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (1999) Devolution in the United Kingdom, 2nd revised edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. (1998) The devolution debate in Wales: The politics of a developing union state? Regional & Federal Studies 8(1): 120–139. Reprinted in Elcock, H. and Keating, M. (eds.) (1998) Remaking the Union, Devolution and British Politics in the 1990s. London: Frank Cass, pp. 120–139.

  • Cairney, P. (2006) Venue shift following devolution: When reserved meets devolved in Scotland. Regional and Federal Studies 16 (4): 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2012) Intergovernmental relations in Scotland. What was the SNP effect? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, D.J. (1988) Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2003) Constitution-Making and the Labour Party. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. (2012) Intergovernmental relations in the UK: Co-operation, competition and constitutional change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, B. and Roller, E. (2004) ‘Té para todos’? A comparison of the processes of devolution in Spain and the UK. Environment and Planning A 36 (12): 2163–2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good Friday Agreement. (1998) Agreement reached in the multi-party negotiations, http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/IE%20GB_980410_Northern%20Ireland%20Agreement.pdf.

  • Hazell, R. (2006) The English question. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36 (1): 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R. (2010) The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform. London: The Constitution Unit, UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government and Scottish Government. (2012) Agreement between the United Kingdom Government and the Scottish Government on a referendum on independence for Scotland, Edinburgh, 15 October, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0040/00404789.pdf.

  • Héritier, A. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2008) Introduction: The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy 28 (1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A. (eds.) (2008) Regional authority in 42 countries 1950–2006. A measure and five hypothesis. Special Issue, Regional and Federal Studies 18 (2–3): 111–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Justice Committee (HCJC). (2008) Devolution: A Decade On. Fifth Report of Session 2008–2009, Vol. 1, HC 529-I.

  • House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution. (2002) Devolution: Inter-Institutional Relations in the United Kingdom, Session 2002–2003, 2nd Report, HL Paper 28.

  • Jeffery, C. (2011) Devolution in the UK. In: M. Flinders, A. Gamble, C. Hay and M. Kenny (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2001) Nations against the State. The New Politics of Nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland, 2nd edn. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2009) The Independence of Scotland. Self-Government and the Shifting Politics of Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2012) Intergovernmental relations and innovation: From co-operation to competitive welfare federalism in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 214–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffin, M., Shaw, E. and Taylor, G. (2007) The new sub-national politics of the British Labour Party. Party Politics 13: 88–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, N., Swenden, W. and Bolleyer, N. (2012) Introduction: Political opposition in a multi-level context. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I. and McMillan, A. (2005) State of the Union. Unionism and the Alternatives in the United Kingdom since 1707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail. (2008) Changing EU governance: A new opportunity for the Scottish Executive? Regional and Federal Studies 18 (1): 19–35.

  • Midwinter, A., Keating, M. and Mitchell, J. (1991) Politics and Public Policy in Scotland. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2003) Governing Scotland: The Invention of Administrative Devolution. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2009) Devolution in the UK. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2012) Regional GVA NUTS 1, 12 December, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Economy#tab-data-tables.

  • Parry, R. (2012) The civil service and intergovernmental relations in the post-devolution UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, J. (2001) The functions of intergovernmental agreements: Post-devolution concordats in a comparative perspective. Public Law 45: 134–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. and Urwin, D. (1982) The Politics of Territorial Identity. Studies in European Regionalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruane, J. and Todd, J. (1996) The Dynamics of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Power, Conflict, and Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scotland Office. (2012) Scotland’s constitutional future. A consultation on facilitating a legal, fair and decisive referendum on whether Scotland should leave the United Kingdom. Cmnd 8203. London: HMSO, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/39248/Scotlands_Constitutional_Future.pdf.

  • Swenden, W. (2006) Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe. A Comparative and Thematic Analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, S. (2008) Giving with one hand: Scottish devolution within a unitary state. In: S. Choudhry (ed.) Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Integration or Accommodation? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 438–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J. (2002) Northern Ireland: Conflict and Change. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2004) Devolution: The withering-away of the joint ministerial committee? Public Law, pp. 513–517.

  • Trench, A. (ed.) (2007) Washing dirty linen in private: The processes of intergovernmental relations and the resolution of disputes. In: Devolution and Power in the UK. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 160–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2008) Intergovernmental Relations, Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report, January. London: Constitution Unit, University College London.

  • Trench, A. (2012) The courts and devolution in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L. (1998) Federalism, federal political systems, and federations. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones, R. and Royles, E. (2012) Wales in the world, intergovernmental relations and sub-state diplomacy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (2): 250–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones, R. and Scully, R. (2012) Wales Says Yes: Devolution and the 2011 Welsh Referendum. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swenden, W., McEwen, N. UK devolution in the shadow of hierarchy? Intergovernmental relations and party politics. Comp Eur Polit 12, 488–509 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.14

Keywords

Navigation