Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy populism? Political populism and migrant integration policies in Rotterdam and Amsterdam

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

The political presence of populist parties has increased in Western Europe since the early 1980s. But populism cannot be limited to a political phenomenon only. However, in scholarly research the political aspects of populism take precedence over the policy aspects. The focus of this article is to what extent policy populism exists and if there is a relation between political populism on policy populism in the area of migrant integration policies. A combination of a qualitative discourse analysis and a quantitative content analysis is used for the analysis of both political and policy documents in two Dutch local case studies, the cities of Rotterdam and Amsterdam. By focussing on populism as relational concept and as discursive ordering, we show that the presence of policy populism is not dependent on political populism. Rather, there seem to be some elective affinities. Next to this, this article shows shifting discourses towards more inclusive-civic ingroups and exclusive-ethnic outgroups. This study shows the gradual sifts, presences and potentials of populist discourse in local politics and especially policies and the emergence of ethnic specificity in regard to these distancing discourses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Consisted of seven categories of neutral categories; four ethnic categories; eight professional categories; four age groups.

  2. Consisted of 16 delinquent categories; 11 age categories; 23 ethnic categories; 9 sex categories; 2 professional categories and 10 national categories.

  3. Consisted of categories like: safety, criminality, health, culture, religion and so on.

References

  • Abts, K. and Rummens, S. (2010) Defending democracy: The concentric containment of political extremism. Political Studies 58 (4): 649–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T. (2003) Populism and democracy: Challenge or pathology? Acta Politica 38 (2): 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (2002) Policy Dynamics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B.L. (2009) Qualitative Research Methods. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.T.D. (1986) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeman, G., Scholten, P.W.A. and Timmermans, A. (forthcoming) Analysing local policy agendas: How local executive coalitions allocate attention. Local Government Studies.

  • Canovan, M. (1981) Populism. London: Junction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (1999) Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Amsterdam (1998) Programma akkoord 1998–2002. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (1999) De kracht van een diverse stad. Plan van aanpak diversiteitsbeleid. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (2002) Alleen het resultaat telt. Programma akkoord 2002–2006 PvdA-VVD-CDA. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (2003a) Integratie in Amsterdam: werk in uitvoering. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (2003b) Erbij horen en meedoen. Uitgangspunten voor integratie. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (2006a) Wij Amsterdammers II. Investeren in mensen en grenzen, 28 February 2006. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (2006b) Actieplan Wij Amsterdammers, 20 January 2005. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Amsterdam (2006c) Mensen maken Amsterdam. Het programma akkoord 2006–2010. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: City of Amsterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (1998) Met raad en daad. Collegeprogramma 1998–2002. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (1998a) Veelkleurige stad. Uitvoeringsprogramma 9. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (1998b) Effectief Allochtonenbeleid. 16 maart 1998. Bestuursdienst Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (2002a) Het nieuwe elan van Rotterdam… en zo gaan we dat doen. Collegeprogramma 2002–2006. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (2002b) Samen leven in Rotterdam. Deltaplan Inburgering: op weg naar actief burgerschap. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (2003) Kadernotitie. Sociale integratie in de moderne Rotterdamse samenleving, 29 april 2003. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (2005) Meedoen of achterblijven. Actieprogramma tegen radicalisering en voor kansen voor Rotterdammers, 4 February 2005. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (2006) De stad van aanpakken. Voor een Rotterdams resultaat. Collegeprogramma 2006–2010. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • City of Rotterdam (2008) Huntu nos por logra. Samen kunnen we het bereiken. Antillianenbeleid in Rotterdam. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Directie Veiligheid.

  • City of Rotterdam (2010) Actieprogramma. Aanpak risicogroepen van Marokkaanse en Antilliaanse afkomst, Februari 2010. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: City of Rotterdam.

  • Crul, M. and Heering, J. (2008) The Position of the Turkish and Moroccan Second Generation in Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, S.L. (2008) From Pariah to Power: The Government Participation of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in West European Democracies. Antwerp, Belgium: University of Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, S. and Rooduijn, M. (2011) Een populistische tijdsgeest in Nederland? Een inhoudsanalyse van de verkiezingsprogramma’s van politieke partijen. In: R. Andeweg and J. Thomassen (eds.) Democratie doorgelicht: het functioneren van de Nederlandse democratie. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press, pp. 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtman, D. and Achterberg, P. (2010) Populisme in de polder. Kritiek: Jaarboek voor socialistische discussie en analyse. Amsterdam: Aksant.

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004) Content Analysis: Introduction to its Methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (2002) The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In: Y. Mény and Y. Surel (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, T. (2011) Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21 (1): 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, W. (2010) Populism. Comments on a democratic desire. Open Cahier on Art and the Public Domain 20: 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, P.W.A. (2011) Framing Immigrant Integration. Dutch Research-Policy Dialogues in Comparative Perspective. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, P.W.A. (2013) Agenda dynamics and the multi-level governance of intractable policy controversies: The case of migrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences 46 (3): 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A.L. and Ingram, H. (1997) Policy Design for Democracy. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2000) Populism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguieff, P. (1995) Political science confronts populism: From a conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos 103: 9–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tops, P. (2007) Regimeverandering in Rotterdam: hoe een stadsbestuur zichzelf opnieuw uitvond. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J. (2008) Dynamics of Power in Dutch Integration Politics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J., Oudenampsen, M., Van Heerikhuizen, B. and Van Reekum, R. (2012) Populisme en de sociologische verbeelding. Sociologie 8 (1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (1998) Democracy and populism. Constellations 5 (1): 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ostaaijen, J. (2010) Aversion and Accommodation. Political Change and Urban Regime Analysis in Dutch Local Government: Rotterdam 1998–2008. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), PO Box 1738, Room T17-53, Rotterdam, DR 3000, The Netherlands

    Mark van Ostaijen

  2. Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), PO Box 1738, Room T17-16, Rotterdam, DR 3000, The Netherlands

    Peter Scholten

Authors
  1. Mark van Ostaijen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Scholten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark van Ostaijen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Ostaijen, M., Scholten, P. Policy populism? Political populism and migrant integration policies in Rotterdam and Amsterdam. Comp Eur Polit 12, 680–699 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.26

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.26

Keywords

Search

Navigation