Abstract
Comparative and international political economy (CPE and IPE) are justifiably obsessed with finance as a source of power and as a key causal force for domestic and international economic outcomes. Yet both CPE and IPE ignore the single largest asset in people's everyday lives and one of the biggest financial assets in most economies: residential property and its associated mortgage debt. This special issue argues that residential housing and housing finance systems have important causal consequences for political behavior, social stability, the structure of welfare states, and macro-economic outcomes. The articles examine specific instances across a range of countries. This introduction has broader aims. First, it shows that housing finance systems are not politically neutral. We argue that the kind of housing people occupy and the property rights surrounding housing can constitute political subjectivities and objective preferences not only about the level of public spending, but also the level and nature of inflation and taxation. Second, like the varieties of capitalism literature, we show that housing finance systems also have important complementarities with the larger economy. But we diverge from the varieties literature, suggesting that ‘varieties of residential capitalism’ are not explained by domestic institutional complementarities alone. Rather, what we refer to as financially repressed and financially liberal systems are globally interdependent. While welfare and taxation systems show high degrees of path dependence, transnational trends in the deregulation of housing finance have altered incentives and preferences for financial institutions, home owners, and would-be home owners. Finally, the introduction offers some speculation about how pocketbooks will drive politics as the global housing busts tightens mortgage belts around the waists of average Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development home owners.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This project has been in generation since 2005. Our thanks to the University of Oslo Department of Political Science, the Research Council of Norway, and the think-tank Res Publica for sponsoring our final workshop in Oslo in April 2008. We also thank Ingrid Hjertaker, Lars Mjøset, Gunnar Trumbull, Sjur Kasa, Trygve Lie, and Øyvind Berge for their comments on papers. Our special thanks go to the editorial team at CEP for their patience and support for this project. Early versions of the papers were presented at the International Studies Association Annual meeting in March 2007.
‘The houses that saved the world — house prices and the world economy,’ The Economist, 30 March 2002.
On the former see the OECD (2004) argument about the Netherlands.
The pervasive regulatory laxity of the second Bush administration is an obvious exception.
EU-wide MBS issues increased 10-fold from 1995 to 2005, and tripled during 2001–2005.
References
Aalbers, M.B. (2006) ‘The geography of mortgage markets’, Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies, Working Paper, Amsterdam.
Aalbers, M.B. (2008) ‘The financialization of home and the mortgage market crisis’, Competition & Change 12 (2): 151–169.
Abdelal, R. (2007) Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Allen, J. (2006) ‘Welfare regimes, welfare systems and housing in Southern Europe’, European Journal of Housing Policy 6 (3): 251–277.
Blyth, M. (2002) Great Transformations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2003) ‘Same as it never was: temporality and typology in the varieties of capitalism’, Comparative European Politics 1 (2): 215–225.
Campbell, J.L. and Pedersen, O.K. (2007) ‘The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success: Denmark in the global economy’, Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 307–332.
Castles, F.G. (1985) The Working Class and Welfare, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Castles, F.G. (1998) ‘The really big trade-off: home ownership and the welfare state in the new world and the old’, Acta Politica 33 (1): 5–19.
Castles, F.G. (2002) ‘Developing new measures of welfare state change and reform’, European Journal of Political Research 41 (5): 613–641.
Castles, F. and Ferrera, M. (1996) ‘Home ownership and the welfare state: is Southern Europe different?’ European Society and Politics 1 (2): 163–185.
Castles, F.G. and Mitchell, D. (1992) ‘Identifying welfare state regimes: the links between politics, instruments and outcomes’, Governance 5 (1): 1–26.
Catte, P., Girouard, N., Price, R. and André, C. (2004) ‘Housing markets, wealth and the business cycle’, OECD Economics Department Papers, No. 394, OECD Publishing.
Doling, J. and Ford, J. (eds.) (2004) Globalisation and Home Ownership: Experiences in Eight Member States of the European Union, Delft: DUP Science, Housing and Urban Policy.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
European Central Bank. (2003) Structural Factors in the EU Housing Markets, Frankfurt a.m.: European Central Bank.
Froud, J., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2007) ‘New actors in a financialised economy and the remaking of capitalism’, New Political Economy 12 (3): 339–347.
Germain, R. (1997) The International Organization of Credit, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Girouard, N. and Blöndal, S. (2001) ‘House prices and economic activity’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 279, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Gourevitch, P. and Shinn, J. (2005) Political Power and Corporate Control, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (2001) ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, in P.A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds.) Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–66.
Hardt, J. (1998) European Integration: Prospects for the Mortgage Lending Industry, Brussels: European Mortgage Federation.
Hay, C. (2006) ‘What's globalization got to do with it? Economic interdependence and the future of European welfare states’, Government and Opposition 41 (1): 1–22.
Hay, C.S. and Rosamond, B. (2002) ‘Globalization, European integration, and the discursive construction of economic imperatives’, Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2): 147–167.
Hemerijck, A. (2002) ‘The Self-Transformation of the European Social Model(s)’, in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–213.
Hobson, J.M. and Seabrooke, L. (2007) Everyday Politics of the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kemeny, J. (1980) ‘Home ownership and privatisation’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 4 (3): 372–388.
Kemeny, J. (2005) ‘“The Really Big Trade-Off” between home ownership and welfare: Castles' evaluation of the 1980 thesis, and a reformulation 25 years on’, Housing, Theory, and Society 22 (2): 59–75.
Langley, P. (2008) The Everyday Life of Global Finance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malpass, P. (2008) ‘Housing and the new welfare state: Wobbly Pillar or cornerstone?’ Housing Studies 23 (1): 1–19.
Mosley, L. (2003) Global Capital and National Governments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neuteboom, P. (2004) ‘A comparative analysis of the net cost of a mortgage for homeowners in Europe’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19: 169–186.
OECD (1995) Securitisation: An International Perspective, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD (2004) Economic Survey — Netherlands 2004, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD (2005a) OECD Economic Outlook No. 78, preliminary edition, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD (2005b) Housing Finance Markets in Transition Economies, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Salverda, W. (2005) ‘The Dutch Model: Magic in a Flat Landscape?’, in U. Becker and H. M. Schwartz (eds.) Employment ‘Miracles’, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 39–64.
Schwartz, H. and Becker, U. (2005) ‘Introduction: Miracles, Mirages, and Markets’, in U. Becker and H.M. Schwartz (eds.) Employment ‘Miracles’, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 11–38.
Schwartz, H.M. (2006) ‘Explaining Australian economic success: good policy or good luck?’ Governance 19 (2): 173–205.
Seabrooke, L. (2001) US Power in International Finance: The Victory of Dividends, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seabrooke, L. (2006) The Social Sources of Financial Power: Domestic Legitimacy and International Financial Orders, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Seabrooke, L. (2007) ‘The everyday social sources of economic crises: from ‘Great Frustrations’ to ‘Great Revelations’ in interwar Britain’, International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 795–810.
Seabrooke, L. (2008) ‘Everyday politics and quasi-public institutions in the international financial order’, mimeo, International Center for Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School, March.
Stephens, M. (2000) ‘Convergence in European mortgage systems before and after the EMU’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 15 (1): 29–52.
Uzuhashi, T. (2003) ‘Japanese model of the welfare state: how has it changed during the ‘lost decade’ of the 1990s’, Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy 2 (2): 1–11.
Zysman, J. (1983) Governments, Markets, and Growth, Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, H., Seabrooke, L. Varieties of Residential Capitalism in the International Political Economy: Old Welfare States and the New Politics of Housing. Comp Eur Polit 6, 237–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.10
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.10