Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving it): What it is and should be About?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

More and more countries implement quotas and install women's policy agencies as an answer to the underrepresentation of women and gender-related interests in politics and policy. The main argument is that more women MPs and the structural presence of attention for women's interests not only contribute to just and democratic politics, but also enhance the quality of democratic decision and policy-making on a substantive level. Women MPs and women's policy agencies would foster the inclusion of women's interests and gendered perspectives. However, it remains unclear what ‘substantive representation of women’ and improving it actually mean. This paper first deals with the ‘what’ of substantive representation of women in terms of the acts and contents involved: what is it about? Next, it focuses on the improvement of the substantive representation of women: what is better substantive representation and how can it be reached? My answer to this question refers to quantitative improvements (for example, more support for women's interests by representatives) and qualitative improvements (for example, support for a broader range of women and women's interests). ‘Good’ substantive representation implies recognizing diversity and ideological conflict regarding women's interests and gendered perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, S.A. (2001) Acting as Women. The Effects and Limitations of Gender in Local Governance. In: S. Carroll (ed.) The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, K. (2002) The Substantive Representation of Women: Newness, Numbers, and Models of Political Representation, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.

  • Bratton, K. (2005) Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success of token women in state legislatures. Gender and Politics 1 (1): 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, K. and Ray, L. (2002) Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 428–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, B.C. (1994) A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Harbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. (2006) Substantive representation of women and the impact of descriptive representation. Case: The Belgian lower house 1900–1979. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 28 (2): 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. (2008a) Studying women’s substantive representation in legislatures: When representative acts, contexts and women’s interests become important. Journal of Representative Democracy, Special issue ‘The substantive representation of women’ (guest editors Karen Celis and Sarah Childs, 44 (2): 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. (2008b) Representation. In: G. Goertz and A. Mazur (eds.) Politics, Gender, and Concepts: Theory and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J. and Krook, M.L. (2008) Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, Special issue ‘The substantive representation of women’ (guest editors Karen Celis and Sarah Childs, 44 (2): 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M.L. (2006) Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Politics and Gender 2 (4): 522–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer Walsh, K. (2002) Female Legislators and the Women’s Rights Agenda. In: C.S. Rosenthal (ed.) Women Transforming Congress, Congressional Studies Series 4. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 370–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (1988) From a small to a large minority: Women in Skandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (ed.) (2006) Women, Quotas and Politics. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, I. and Hartsock, N. (1981) Beyond interests in politics: A comment on Virginia Sapiro's ‘When are interests interesting? The problem of Political Representation of Women’. The American Political Science Review 75 (3): 717–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, D. (2001) Acting for Women. Is What Legislators Say, What They Do? In: S. Carroll (ed.) The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, D. (2006) The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, D. and Carroll, S. (1995) Voices, Views, Votes: The Impact of Women in the 103rd Congress, The Impact of Women in Public Office. New Jersey: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovi, S. (2002) Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black, or Latino do? The American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S. (2002) Does size matter? Critical mass and New Zealand’s women MP’s. Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htun, M. and Jones, M. (2002) Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women’s Leadership in Latin America. In: N. Craske and M. Molyneux (eds.) Gender, the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 432–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónasdóttir, A.G. (1988) On the Concept of Interests, Women’s Interests and the Limitation of Interest Theory. In: K.B. Jones and A.G. Jónasdóttir (eds.) The Political Interests of Gender. London: Sage Publications, pp. 33–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathlene, L. (2001) Words That Matter. Women’s Voice and Institutional Bias in Public Policy Formation. In: S. Carroll (ed.) The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 22–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1997) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, J. (2005) Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, J., Baudino, C., Guadagnini, M., Meier, P. and Sainsbury, D. (eds.) (2005) State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (ed.) (2001) State Feminism, Women’s Movements and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A.G. (2002) Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McBride Stetson, D. (2001) Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McBride Stetson, D. and Mazur, A. (2000) Women's movements and the state: Job training policy in France and the US. Political Research Quarterly 53 (3): 597–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, M. (1985) Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies 11 (2): 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, N. (2002) Transforming Policy from the Inside. Participating in Committee. In: C.S. Rosenthal (ed.) Women Transforming Congress, Congressional Studies Series 4. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 316–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offen, K. (2000) European Feminisms 1700–1950: A Political History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, V. (2000) Gender Matters. Female Policymakers’ Influence in Industrialized Nations. Westport, London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, J. (2004) Introduction: Prostitution, Women’s Movements and Democratic Politics. In: J. Outshoorn (ed.) The Politics of Prostitution: Women’s Movements, Democratic States and the Globalisation of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, J. and Kantola, J. (eds.) (2007) Changing State Feminism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1995) The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1998) Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should It Matter Who Our Representatives Are? In: A. Phillips (ed.) Feminism and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H.F. (1972) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, B. (2000) Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, D. (1996) Gender, Equality, and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, V. (1981) When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. The American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, W. (2005) Women in Contemporary Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swers, M.L. (1998) Are women more likely to vote for women's issue bills than their male colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swers, M.L. (2002) The Difference Women Make. The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamerius, K. (1995) Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women. In: G. Duerst-Lahti and R.M. Kelly (eds.) Gender Power and Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Robinson, M.M. and Heath, R.M. (2003) Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women and Politics 24 (4): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M. (1998) Do female MPs substantively represent women? A study of legislative behaviour in Canada’s 35th Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 435–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, L. (1997) Feminist Policies in the Alberta Legislature, 1972–1994. In: J. Arscott and L. Trimble (eds.) In the Presence of Women: Representation and Canadian Governments. Toronto: Harcourt Brace, pp. 128–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wängnerud, L. (2000) Testing the politics of presence: Women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, L.S. (2002) Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1998) Voice, Trust, and Memory. The Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrecht, C. (2002) Female Legislators and the Women’s Rights Agenda. In: C.S. Rosenthal (ed.) Women Transforming Congress, Congressional Studies Series 4. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 170–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. (1997) Deferring Group Representation. In: I. Shapiro and W. Kymlicka (eds.) Ethnicity and Group Rights, Nomos 39, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. New York: New York University Press, pp. 349–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Studies and Public Administration, University College Ghent – Ghent University, Voskenslaan 270, Ghent, B – 9000, Belgium

    Karen Celis

Authors
  1. Karen Celis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Celis, K. Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving it): What it is and should be About?. Comp Eur Polit 7, 95–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.35

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.35

Keywords

Search

Navigation