Skip to main content
Log in

The politics of insurance regulation and supervision reform in the European Union

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In the late 2000s, the European Union (EU) undertook a significant reform of the framework for insurance regulation and supervision through the Solvency II directive, which substantially updated prudential rules and supervisory practices. This article addresses the question of what has driven the reform of the framework for insurance regulation and supervision in the EU. It is argued that the politics of the Solvency II directive was characterised by a strong alliance between the Commission and the United Kingdom, backed up by the large member states, some old member states and industry, particularly large companies and transnational groups. The United Kingdom was, however, the pace setter, whose influence was underpinned by the size of its insurance market; the expertise and effective coordination of national policymakers, and a state-of-the-art domestic regulatory model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following the terminology introduced by the Lamfalussy architecture (Committee of Wise Men, 2001), at level 1, the EP and the Council co-decide framework legislation proposed by the Commission. At level 2, the implementing measures (generally directives, less frequently regulations) of the level 1 framework legislation are adopted by the Commission through the comitology process, which involves the so-called level 2 committees of member states representatives. At level 3, the committees of national regulators (the level 3 committees) advise the Commission on the adoption of level 1 and level 2 measures and adopt level 3 measures, such as non-legally binding standards and guidelines.

  2. According to the congruence procedure, theoretical predictions concerning the outcome of the dependent variable are compared with the real outcome. If the real outcome is consistent with the predictions, then there is at least a presumption of a causal relationship (see George and Bennett, 2005).

  3. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/international/isg_minutes13.pdf.

  4. See the minutes of the Insurance Standing Group August 2005, http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/international/isg_minutes1.pdf, see also the minutes of the meeting of February 2006 on the use of the group model, http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/international/isg_minutes6.pdf.

  5. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/About/What/International/solvency/isg/index.shtml, accessed June 2008.

  6. I wish to thank a referee for this point.

References

  • Bailer, S. (2004) Bargaining success in the EU. European Union Politics 5: 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, H.-J. (2003) Social forces in the making of the new European economy: The case of financial market integration. New Political Economy 8 (2): 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2002) Pace-setting, foot-dragging and fence-sitting: Member states response to Europeanisation. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S., Humphreys, P., Padgett, S. and Dolowitz, D.P. (2007) Policy Transfer in European Union Governance: Regulating the Utilities. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. and Lequesne, C. (eds.) (2005) The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. and Padgett, S. (2004) Policy transfer in the European Union: An institutionalist perspective. British Journal of Political Science 35: 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos, D. and Quaglia, L. (2009) Network constraints in EU banking regulation: The case of the Capital Requirements directive. Journal of Public Policy 29 (2): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D. and Thatcher, M. (2008) Network governance and multi-level delegation: European Networks of Regulatory Agencies. Journal of Public Policy 28 (1): 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. and Underhill, G. (1998) Globalism, regionalism, and the emergence of international securities markets: The case of IOSCO and EU financial integration. In: W. Coleman and G. Underhill (eds.) Regionalism and Global Economic Integration: Europe, Asia, and the Americas. London: Routledge, pp. 223–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comité Européen des Assurances (CEA). (2005) Topography of EU25: Description of Markets, Products and Distribution. Brussels.

  • Comité Européen des Assurances (CEA). (2007a) Solvency II, Diversification and Specialisation. Briefing Note, 1, May 2007, Brussels.

  • Comité Européen des Assurances (CEA). (2007b) The Insurance Groups and Solvency II. Briefing Note, 2, May 2007, Brussels.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (1999) The Review of the Overall Financial Position of an Insurance Undertaking (Solvency II Review). Brussels, December 1999.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001a) Solvency II: Presentation of the Proposed Work. Brussels, 13 March 2001.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001b) Banking Rules: Relevance for the Insurance Sector. Brussels, 12 June 2001.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2004) Framework for Consultation on Solvency II. Brussels, 14 July 2004.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2005) Considerations Concerning the Outline for a Framework Directive on Solvency II. Brussels, 23 March 2005.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2007) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Taking-up and Pursuit of the Business of Insurance and Reinsurance – Solvency II. Brussels, 10 July 2007.

  • Conference of Insurance Supervisors (CIS). (2002) (Sharma Report) Report Prudential Supervision of Insurance Undertakings. December 2002.

  • De Visscher, C., Maiscocq, O. and Varone, F. (2008) The Lamfalussy reform in EU securities markets: Fiduciary relationships, policy effectiveness and balance of power. Journal of Public Policy 28 (1): 19–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2007) Adapting to the New Regime. London.

  • European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Committee (EIOPC). (2005) Legislative Approach for Solvency II and Possible Impact on the Timing. 29 June 2005.

  • European Parliament (EP). (2008) Working Document on Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II): On Group Supervision, MCR and Own Funds. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Brussels, 21 February 2008.

  • Felsted, A. and Tait, N. (2008) Move to revamp insurance rules wins support. Financial Times 19 March: 4.

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2001) The Future Regulation of Insurance. London, November 2001.

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2002) The Future Regulation of Insurance: A Progress Report. London, October 2002.

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2005a) Delivering the Tiner Insurance Reforms. London, April 2005.

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2005b) Insurance Sector Briefing: ICAS – One Year On. London, November 2005.

  • Geneva Association (International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics). (2005) Insurance and Finance Research on Finance Issues in Insurance. Newsletter, Geneva, December 2005.

  • George, A. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, E. (2004) Bringing politics back in: Rethinking the role of economic interest groups in European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. (1968) The Uniting of Europe: Political Social and Economic Forces 1950–57. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. (eds.) (2007) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Contradictions, Complementarities & Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, F., Van Aken, W. and Wallace, H. (2006) When and why the EU council of ministers votes explicitly. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty's Treasury (HMT) and Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2006a) Solvency II: A New Framework for Prudential Regulation of Insurance in the EU. London, February 2006.

  • Her Majesty's Treasury (HMT) and Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2006b) Supervising Insurance Groups Under Solvency II – A Discussion Paper. London, November 2006.

  • Héritier, A. (1996) The accommodation of diversity in European policy-making: Regulatory policy as patchwork. Journal of European Public Policy 3 (3): 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.J. (2005) The Policy Process: A Reader. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. (2008) Solvency II: Report with Evidence. European Union Committee, London, 6 February 2008.

  • Howell, K.E. (2004) Up-loading, downloading or European integration? The Europeanization of financial services regulation. Politics 24 (1): 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabko, N. (2006) Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselin, D. (1997) Money Politics in the New Europe: Britain, France and the Single Financial Market. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2000a) The United Kingdom's co-ordination of European Union policy. In: H. Kassim, G. Peters and V. Wright (eds.) The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: The Domestic Level. Oxford: OUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2000b) Representing the UK in Brussels: The fine art of positive coordination. In: H. Kassim, G. Peters and V. Wright (eds.) The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: The European Level. Oxford: OUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peters, G. and Wright, V. (eds.) (2000a) The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: The Domestic Level. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peters, G. and Wright, V. (eds.) (2000b) The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: The European Level. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2002) Study into the Methodologies to Assess the Overall Financial Position of an Insurance Undertaking from the Perspective of Prudential Supervision. May 2002.

  • Macartney, H. (2009) Variegated neo-liberalism: Transnationally oriented fractions of capital in EU financial market integration. Review of International Studies 35 (2): 451–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macartney, H. and Moran, M. (2008) Banking and financial market regulation and supervision. In: D. Kenneth (ed.) The Euro at Ten. Oxford: Oxford University press, pp. 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, I. and Verdun, A. (2005) The role of medium-sized countries in the creation of EMU: The cases of Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (2): 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. (1991) The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution: The USA, UK and Japan. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mügge, D. (2006) Reordering the marketplace: Competition politics in European finance. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (5): 991–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, S. (2003) Between synthesis and emulation: EU policy transfer in the power sector. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (2): 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. (2005) Sources of institutional change: The supranational origins of Europe's new stock markets. World Politics 58: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. (2007) Financial transformation in the European Union. In: S. Meunier and K. McNamara (eds.) Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2007) The politics of financial services regulation and supervision reform in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research 46 (2): 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2008a) Committee governance in the financial sector in the European Union. Journal of European Integration 30 (3): 565–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2008b) Completing the Single Market in Financial Services: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Working Paper of the Sussex European Institute N 102.

  • Radaelli, C.M. (1999) The public policy of the European Union: Whither politics of expertise? Journal of European Public Policy 6 (5): 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. (2000) Policy transfer in the European Union; institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance 13 (1): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. and Stone-Sweet, A. (eds.) (1998) European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2002) The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Story, J. and Walter, I. (1997) Political Economy of Financial Integration in Europe: The Battle of the System. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, N. (2008) Insurers fear political delay to EU reform. Financial Times 10 June: 4.

  • Tait, N. and Davies, P.J. (2009) Insurers to review capital requirements. Financial Times 23 April: 14.

  • Tallberg, J. (2006) Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, G. (1997) The making of the European financial area: Global market integration and the EU single market for financial service. In: G. Underhill (ed.) The New World Order in International Finance. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Apeldoorn, B. (2002) Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle Over European Integration. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. (2005) Exercising power and influence in the European Union: The roles of the member states. In: S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne (eds.) The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the European Research Council (204398 FINGOVEU) is gratefully acknowledged. I thank all the practitioners who made themselves available for interview as well as the reviewers for their perceptive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quaglia, L. The politics of insurance regulation and supervision reform in the European Union. Comp Eur Polit 9, 100–122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2009.12

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2009.12

Keywords

Navigation