Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

National Parliaments in the post-Lisbon European Union: Bureaucratization rather than Democratization?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Much of the discussion about the provisions on national parliaments in the Lisbon Treaty has concerned the potential for increasing politicization and parliamentarization of European Union (EU) politics. However, a more immediate change can be expected at the domestic level, as national parliaments adapt to make effective use of these new powers. In order to approach this question systematically, this article develops a framework for the analysis of the Europeanization of national parliaments that starts from the recognition that the Lisbon changes involve an inherent dynamic towards increasing transnational interaction among parliaments as well as pressures to rely more on technical expertise and administrative support in their internal workings. The processes of transnationalization and bureaucratization are considered as key indicators that help us to identify different degrees of Europeanization of national parliaments in the EU. As a final step, the article develops a typology of national parliaments based on the assumption that the more Europeanized parliaments will tend to invest more into their administrative resources and will engage to a greater extent with other national parliaments as well as with EU-level actors. The conceptual framework developed here is designed to facilitate systematic empirical research into the Europeanization of national parliaments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the case of the area of freedom, security and justice (Article 76 TFEU), the threshold is a quarter of the votes.

  2. Cf. COSAC (2008) for a review of all Treaty changes affecting national parliaments.

  3. See also Huber (2000).

  4. This is notwithstanding the fact that in mid-2012 a ‘yellow card’ was issued for the first time through the EWS system. While the legislative proposal under dispute was withdrawn, the Commission claims that this was the result of member state resistance more generally and the precise impact of the yellow card remains disputed (Wishart, 13/03/2012, European Voice).

References

  • Arnold, D. (1987) Political control of administrative officials. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 3 (2): 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. (2005) Introduction: The Europeanization of parliamentary democracy. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. (2006) The Europeanisation of the German Bundestag: Institutional change and informal adaptation. German Politics 15 (3): 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. and Benz, A. (2005) The politics of adaptation: Europeanisation of national parliamentary systems. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, F. (2012) Civil servants: how to support the political level: The French Case. In: C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker and L. Verhey (eds.) Civil Servants and Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G. (2012) The early warning systems: Some early reflections. Presented at Parliaments in the European Union after Lisbon. 23–24 February, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

  • Benz, A. (2007) Accountable multilevel governance by the open method of coordination? European Law Journal 13 (4): 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C Van den (2011) Transforming for Europe. The Reshaping of National Bureaucracies in a System of Multi-Level Governance. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2002) Pace-setting, foot-dragging, and fence-sitting: Member state responses to Europeanization. JCMS 40 (2): 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. and Risse, T. (2003) Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe. In: K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T., Högenauer, A. and Neuhold, C. (2011) Parliamentary Administrations in the European Union. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. (2006) The watchdogs of subsidiarity: National parliaments and the logic of arguing in the EU. Journal of Comman Market Studies 44 (2): 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. (2012) A ‘Virtual third chamber’ for the European Union? National parliaments after the Treaty of Lisbon. West European Politics 35 (3): 441–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSAC. (2008) Nineth bi-annual report: Development in European Union procedures and practices relevant to parliamentary scrutiny, http://www.cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac/, accessed 28 August 2012.

  • Damgaard, E. and Jensen, H. (2005) Europeanisation of executive-legislative relations: Nordic perspectives. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 394–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruiter, R. (2010) EU soft law and the functioning of representative democracy: The use of method of open coordination by Dutch and British parliamentarians. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (6): 874–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P. (2012) Why the early warning system does not alleviate the democratic deficit. Presented at Parliaments in the European Union after Lisbon. 23–24 February, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

  • Dimitrakopoulos, D. (2001) Incrementalism and path dependence: European integration and institutional change in National parliaments. Journal of Comman Market Studies 39 (3): 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbels, M. and Neuhold, C. (2012) The Roles bureaucrats play: The input of European Parliament (EP) administrators into the ordinary legislative procedure: A case study approach. Journal of European Integration.

  • Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, A., Trondal, J. and Johannessen, M. (2012) Parliament staff: Unpacking the behaviour of officials in the European parliament. Journal of European Public Policy: 1–20.

  • European Council. (2001) Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union, http://european-convention.eu.int/pdf/lknen.pdf, accessed 28 August 2012.

  • Gailmard, S. (2002) Expertise, subversion and bureaucratic discretion. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 18 (2): 536–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gailmard, S. and Patty, J. (2007) Slackers and Zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 873–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. (2000) Europeanisation and national executives: a cause in search of an effect. West European Politics 23 (4): 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T. and Scholl, B. (2002) Europeanization and domestic parliamentary adaptation – A comparative analysis of the Bundestag and the house of commons. European Integration Online Papers 6 (15): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R. (1999) The Europeanization of national administrations: A comparative study of France and The Netherlands. Governance 12 (1): 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hefftler, C., Neuhold, C., Rozenberg, O., Smith, J. and Wessels, W. (eds.) (2012) The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högenauer, A. and Neuhold, C. (2012) National Parliaments after Lisbon: Administrations on the Rise? UACES General Conference, Passau: 3–5 September.

  • Holzhacker, R. (2007) Parliamentary scrutiny. In: P. Graziano and M. Vink (eds.) Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2000) Delegation to civil servants in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski, P. (2011) Paper tigers or sleeping beauties? National Parliaments in the post-Lisbon European Political System. Europe. Brussels.

  • Kassim, H. (2003) The National co-ordination of EU policy: Must Europeanisation mean convergence? In: K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanisation: Theory and Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–111.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kiiver, P. (2006) The National Parliaments in the European Union: A Critical View on EU Constitution-Building. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiiver, P. (2011) The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: The National parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe. European Law Review 36 (1): 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiiver, P. (2012) The Early Warning System for the Principle of Subsidiarity. Constitutional Theory and Empirical Reality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (2001) The Europeanisation of National Administrations. Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002) The national impact of European Union Regulatory Policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, R. (1994) Europeanization of domestic politics and institutions: The Case of France. Journal of Comman Market Studies 32 (1): 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. (2005) The role of National Parliamentary Committees in European scrutiny: Reflections based on the Danish case. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 412–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984) The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. and Wessels, W. (eds.) (2001) National Parliaments on their Ways to Europe: Losers or Latecomers? Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. and Schwartz, T. (1984) Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 16–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklin, E. and Crum, B. (2011) Inter-Parliamentary Contacts of Members of the European Parliament. Report of a Survey. RECON Online Working Paper 2011/08, Oslo: ARENA – Centre for European Studies.

  • Moe, T. (1990) Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 6 (Special Issue): 213–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1995) Why international cooperation strengthens national executives: The case of the European Community. Paper presented at the ECSA Conference; Charleston, SC.

  • Morgan, E.P. and Perry, J.L. (1988) Re-orienting the comparative study of civil service systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration 8 (3): 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (2006) Elected legislators and their unelected assistants in the European Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies 8 (4): 40–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. (ed.) (1996) National parliaments and the European Union. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brennan, J. and Raunio, T. (2007) National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. (1997) European challenges to the nation state. In: B. Steunenberg and F. van Vught (eds.) Political Institutions and Public Policy. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 157–188.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. and Jenkins, B. (2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Government With a Cast of Thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. (2003) The Europeanization of Public Policy. In: K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (1999) Always one step behind? National legislature and the European Union. Government and Opposition 34 (2): 180–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (2007) National legislatures and the Constitutional Treaty. In: J. O’Brennan and T. Raunio (eds.) National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union: From ‘Victims’ of Integration to Competitive Actors? Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (2009) National Parliaments and European Integration: What we know and agenda for future research. Journal of Legislative Studies 15 (4): 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (2010) Destined for Irrelevance? Subsidiarity Control by National Parliaments. Europe Working Paper 36/2010, Real Instituto Elcano.

  • Raunio, T. and Wiberg, M. (2009) How to measure the Europeanisation of a national legislature? Scandinavian Political Studies 33 (1): 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., Green Cowles, M. and Caporaso, J.A. (eds.) (2001) Europeanization and domestic change: Introduction. In: Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberger, S. and Vogt, O. (2007) The ‘Orange Card’: A fitting response to National Parliaments’ Marginalisation in EU decision-making? Paper presented at the WSP Conference ‘Fifty Years in Interparliamentary Cooperation’, 13 June, Berlin.

  • Weber-Panariello, P.A. (1995) Nationale parlamente in der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winzen, T. (2011) Technical or political? An exploration of the work of officials in the committees of the European Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (1): 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, I. (2012) ‘Right to Strike’ law withdrawn. European Voice, 13 March, http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/-right-to-strike-law-withdrawn/75103.aspx.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics, FASOS, Maastricht University, P.O. 616, Maastricht, MD 6200, The Netherlands

    Thomas Christiansen, Anna-lena Högenauer & Christine Neuhold

Authors
  1. Thomas Christiansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna-lena Högenauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine Neuhold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Christiansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christiansen, T., Högenauer, Al. & Neuhold, C. National Parliaments in the post-Lisbon European Union: Bureaucratization rather than Democratization?. Comp Eur Polit 12, 121–140 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.38

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.38

Keywords

Search

Navigation