Abstract
This study examines the role of partisanship in the effectiveness of the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. As a soft governance approach, Lisbon aims to disseminate best practices on labour market policy across EU member states. The policy learning view, as the underlying philosophy of Lisbon, holds that national governments can learn new and better policy practices through interaction with alternative ideas. In contrast, the partisanship approach suggests that governments choose only the components of the Lisbon strategy fitting the ideological preferences of the political parties in government. In this article, I analyse the labour market policies of Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden in two separate years to trace the effects of the Lisbon strategy in varying political environments. The study reveals that the governments of these countries do not give equal attention to all recommendations and guidelines; they address in particular those recommendations and guidelines that fit the ideological preferences of the incumbent parties.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The main sources of data are the national action plans (NAPs) and the national reform plans (NRPs) in which the countries state how they have dealt with the recommendations. These policy documents are similar in kind, but have been renamed in 2005 based on the mid-term evaluation (Employment Taskforce, 2003). Note that the mid-term evaluation report was already finished in 2003, so in both years of observation governments should be expected to be aware of its content.
References
Allan, J.P. and Scruggs, L. (2004) Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 496–512.
Armingeon, K. (2007) Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (6): 905–932.
Castles, F.G. and Mair, P. (1984) Left-right political scales: Some ‘experts’ judgements. European Journal of Political Research 12 (1): 73–88.
Council of the European Union. (2003) Council recommendation of 22 July 2003 on the implementation of member states’ employment policies. Official Journal of the European Union, L-series 197: 22–30, 5 August.
Council of the European Union. (2007) Council recommendation of 27 March 2007 on the 2007 update of the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the member states and the community and on the implementation of member states’ employment policies. Official Journal of the European Union, L-series 92: 23–42, 3 April.
Danish government. (2004) The Government: Denmark's National Action Plan for Employment. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish government.
Danish government. (2008) Denmark's National Reform Programme. Contribution to the EU's Growth and Employment Strategy (The Lisbon Strategy). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish government.
De la Porte, C. and Nanz, P. (2007) The OMC – A deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (2): 267–288.
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Dutch government. (2004) National Action Plan for Employment 2004. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dutch government.
Dutch government. (2008) National Reform Programme for The Netherlands 2008–2010. In The Context of the Lisbon Strategy. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dutch government.
Employment Taskforce. (2003) Jobs, Jobs, Jobs. Creating More Employment in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Employment Taskforce.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
European Commission. (2005) Working Together for Growth and Jobs. A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy, COM (2005) 24 Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2 February.
Gerring, J. (2007) Case Study Research. Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green-Pedersen, C. (2002) The Politics of Justification. Party Competition and Welfare-State Retrenchment in Denmark and The Netherlands from 1982–1998. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
Hall, P. (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy-making in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.
Hartlapp, M. (2009) Learning about policy learning. Reflections on the European Employment Strategy. European Integration Online Papers 13 (Special Issue 1), Art. 7.
Heidenreich, M. and Bischoff, G. (2008) The open method of co-ordination: A way to the Europeanization of social and employment policies? Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (3): 497–532.
Heidenreich, M. and Zeitlin, J. (2009) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes. The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Hibbs, D.A. (1977) Political parties and macro-economic policy. American Political Science Review 71 (4): 1467–1487.
Hooghe, L. et al (2010) Measurement validity and party positioning: Chapel Hill expert surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research 42 (4): 684–703.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–989.
Jacobsson, K. (2004) Soft regulation and the subtle transformation of states: The case of EU employment policy. Journal of European Social Policy 14 (4): 355–370.
Kerber, W. and Eckardt, M. (2007) Policy learning in Europe: The open method of co-ordination and laboratory federalism. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (2): 227–247.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003) New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 countries, 1975–1995. American Political Science Review 97 (3): 425–446.
Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2000) The past in the present: A cleavage theory of the party responses to European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30 (3): 433–459.
Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (1999) Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (1994) The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2010) Stat.Extracts. http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx, accessed 30 May 2010.
Pierson, P. (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48 (2): 143–179.
Radaelli, C.M. (2008) Europeanization, policy learning, and new modes of governance. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10 (3): 239–254.
Rose, R. (2005) Learning From Comparative Public Policy. A Practical Guide. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Scharpf, F. (2002) The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 645–670.
Strøm, K. (1990) A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 565–598.
Swedish government. (2004) Sweden's Action Plan for Employment 2004. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish government.
Swedish government. (2008) The Swedish Reform Programme for Growth and JOBS. 2008 to 2010. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish government.
Tholoniat, L. (2010) The career of the open method of coordination: Lessons from a ‘soft’ EU instrument. West European Politics 33 (1): 93–117.
Trubek, D.M. and Trubek, L.G. (2005) Hard and soft law in the construction of social Europe: The role of the open method of co-ordination. European Law Journal 11 (3): 343–364.
Vanhercke, B. (2009) Against the odds. The open method of coordination as a selective amplifier for reforming Belgian pension policies. European Integration Online Papers 13 (Special Issue 1), Art. 16.
Weishaupt, J.T. (2009) Money, votes or ‘good’ ideas? Partisan politics and the effectiveness of the European Employment Strategy in Austria and Ireland. European Integration Online Papers 13 (Special Issue 1), Art. 14.
Acknowledgements
I thank Ben Crum and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delfani, N. Experts versus politicians: The role of partisan ideology in European Union employment policy. Comp Eur Polit 11, 70–92 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.3