Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

European patterns of participation – How dissatisfaction motivates extra-parliamentary activities given the right institutional conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article focuses on explaining the variation in extra-parliamentary activities, such as signing petitions, demonstrating, displaying badge stickers and boycotting products in 20 European Union (EU) countries. The main questions this article will deal with are: first, how feelings of dissatisfaction with the government and feelings of being member of a discriminated group affect the level of extra-parliamentary participation, and second, how different welfare regimes condition the extend to which these groups chose to act. In a comparative multilevel design, using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) Round 4 (2008), the article finds that satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the government is an important predictor alongside the institutional macro-level variable. The article combines a critical tradition, which suggests that political participation is motivated by a feeling of dissatisfaction with an institutional perspective in which certain institutional conditions are seen as enablers for citizens to actively participate in political life. Our results show that the overall level of extra-parliamentary activity in the Scandinavian countries is higher than in the other European welfare regimes and that the connection between dissatisfaction with the government and extra-parliamentary activity is stronger. The article concludes that the welfare state and the political system in the Scandinavian countries enable dissatisfied and discriminated groups of people to get engaged in extra-parliamentary activities to a greater extent than other EU countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Lack of representation in government is one aspect of the dissatisfaction that lead people to participate. There are others. To cite Citrin (1974) ‘we need to distinguish, operationally, between the following attitudes: Dissatisfaction with current government policy positions, dissatisfaction with the outcomes of ongoing events and policies, mistrust of incumbent officeholders, and rejection of the entire political system’. Our two central independent variables at the individual level to explain variation in political participation are dissatisfaction with the government and feeling of being a member of a discriminated group (p. 14–15).

  2. In an additional analysis we apply a random slope model in order to check the robustness of the results. The results of the random slope model were very similar to the random intercept model.

  3. We have run an additional analysis with the Continental countries as reference category. The analysis also shows that the negative association between satisfaction with the government and extra-parliamentary activities in Scandinavia are significantly stronger compared with the reference category.

References

  • Bäck, H., Toerell, J. and Westholm, A. (2011) Explaining modes of participation: A dynamic test of alternative rational choice models. Scandinavian Political Studies 34 (1): 74–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S.H. and Kaase, M. et al. (eds.) (1979) Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerlein, J. and Ward, H. (2007) The Importance of Anger for Explaining Participation in Various Types of Activism. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York City, 11 August, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p184142_index.html.

  • Blumer, H. (1939) Collective behaviour. In: R.E. Park (eds.) An Outline of the Principles of Sociology. New York: Barnes and Noble, pp. 220–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J. (1974) The political relevance of trust in government. The American Political Science Review 68 (3): 973–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J. and Newton, K. (2003) Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies 5 (2): 93–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enrique, L., Johnston, H. and Gusfield, J.R. (1994) New Social Movements. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey (ESS) Round 4 Data. (2008) Data file edition 4.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway (Data Archive and distributor of ESS data).

  • Etzioni, A. (1995) The Spirit of Community. London: Fontana Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flacks, R. (1967) The liberated generation: An exploration of the roots of student protest. Journal of Social Issues 23 (3): 52–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2008) Scales of Justice. Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2000) Social Capital and Civil Society. Washington DC. IMF Working Paper No. 00/74.

  • Geraint, P., Moyser, G. and Day, N. (1992) Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. and Polletta, F. (2000) The return of the repressed: The fall and rise of emotions in social movement theory. Mobilization 5 (1): 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. and Polletta, F. (2001) Why emotions matter. In: J. Goodwin, J.M. Jasper and F. Polletta (eds.) Passionate Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, M.A. (2006) Civic responsibilities and patterns of voluntary participation around the world. Comparative Political Studies 39 (10): 1220–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2004) The importance of being angry: Anger in political life. European Journal of Social Theory 7 (2): 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, D.S. and Korosteleva, E.A. (2006) Patterns of participation in post-Soviet politics. Comparative European Politics 4 (1): 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. and Booher, D. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice 5 (4): 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J.M. (2006) Emotions and the microfoundations of politics: Rethinking ends and means. In: S. Clarke, P. Hoggett and S. Thompson (eds.) Emotion, Politics, and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 14–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H. and Klandermans, B. (1995) Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kääriäinen, K. and Lehtonen, M. (2006) The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes – A comparative study of 21 countries. European Societies 8 (1): 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaase, M. (1999) Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics 22 (3): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, K. (1967) The sources of student dissent. Journal of Social Issues 23 (3): 108–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H.D. and Fuchs, D. (1995) Citizens and the State. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2002) Enhancing political participation: What is the role of social capital? Comparative Political Studies 35 (4): 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letki, N. (2003) Explaining Political participation in East-Central Europe: Social Capital, Democracy and the Communist Past. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Harvard University.

  • Lyons, W.E. and Lowery, D. (1986) The organisation of political space and citizen responses to dissatisfaction in urban communities: An integrative model. The Journal of Politics 48 (2): 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marien, S., Hooghe, M. and Quintelier, E. (2010) Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of participation. A multilevel analysis for 25 countries. Political Studies 58 (1): 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T.H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascherini, M., Saltelli, A. and Vidoni, D. (2007) Participation in Europe: One-Size-Fits-None. Institute for the protection and security of the citizen. European Commision, pp. 1–46.

  • Morris, A. and Mueller, C. (1992) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. and Giebler, H. (2008) Patterns of participation: Political and social participation in 22 nations. Discussion Paper for Wissenschaftscentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2008/iv08-201.pdf.

  • Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1984) Contradiction in the Welfare States. London: Huchington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oorschot, W.J.H. van and Arts, W.A. (2005) The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy 15 (1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2007) The Quality of Government and Social Capital: A Theory of Political Institutions and Generalised Trust. QoG Working Paper series no 2, Göteborg University.

  • Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2003) Introduction: Social capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., Samanni, M. and Teorell, J. (2011) Explaining the welfare state: Power resources vs. quality of government. European Political Science Review 4 (1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S. and Brady, H. (1995) Participation’s not a paradox: The view from American activists. British Journal of Political Science 25 (1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi-Haghighat, M. and Mansouri, M. (2010) Where is my vote? International Journal of Emerging Technology and Society 8 (1): 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N.J. (1962) Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L. (2009) The inequality of participation: Re-examining the role of social stratification and post-communism on political participation in Europe. Czech Sociological Review 45 (3): 487–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. et al. (2011) Prospects for Citizenship. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J., Torcal, M. and Montero, J.M. (2007) Political participation. Mapping the terrain. In: J.W. Van Deth, J.R. Montero and A. Westholm (eds.) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 334–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2006) Anger and the struggle for justice. In: C. Hoggett and S. Thompson (eds.) Emotion, Politics, and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 123–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, T.W.G., Van Deth, J.W. and Scheepers, P.L.H. (2009) The politicized participant – Ideology and political action in 20 democracies. Comparative Political Studies 42 (11): 1426–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ingen, E. and Van der Meer, T.W.G. (2011) Welfare state expenditure and inequalities in voluntary associations participation. Journal of European Social Policy 21 (4): 302–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (1989) Whose Keeper? Social Science and Moral Obligation. San Francisco, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Society and Globalisation, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, Hus 25.3, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Silas Harrebye & Anders Ejrnæs

Authors
  1. Silas Harrebye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anders Ejrnæs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrebye, S., Ejrnæs, A. European patterns of participation – How dissatisfaction motivates extra-parliamentary activities given the right institutional conditions. Comp Eur Polit 13, 151–174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.7

Keywords

Search

Navigation