Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The implementation of administrative burden reduction policy: Mechanisms and contexts in the study of Europeanization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

The article analyzes how Administrative Burden Reduction has been implemented in Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Using an institutional processualist approach we show how this policy instrument has been implemented differently in these countries depending on the concatenation of mechanisms activated by the interplay between agency and structure. The article thus contributes both to the Europeanization literature and to the institutional processualist approach, which has so far only been applied to single country cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barzelay, M. (2001) The New Public Management. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. (2003) Introduction: The process dynamics of public management policy making. International Public Management Journal 6(3): 251–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. (2007) Methodology for extrapolation-oriented case research. Governance 20(3): 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. and Gallego, R. (2006) From new institutionalism to institutional processualism. Governance 19(4): 531–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. and Shvets, E. (2006) Innovating government-wide public management practices to implement development policy. International Public Management Journal 9(1): 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. and Risse, T. (2003) Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe. In: K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. and Rhodes, M. (2007) New Modes of Governance in the European Union. European Governance Papers No. N-07-01, http://www.connexnetwork.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-newgov-N-07-01.pdf.

  • Coletti, P. (2013) Evidence for Public Policy Design. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coletti, P. and Radaelli, C.M. (2013) Economic rationales, learning, and regulatory policy instruments. Public Administration 91(4): 1056–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, C., Pierre, J. and Peters, B.G. (eds.) (2011) Steering from the Centre. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Measuring Administrative Costs and Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union. Brussels: COM, p. 691.

  • European Commission (2007) Action Program for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union. Brussels: COM, p. 23.

  • European Commission (2010) Smart Regulation in the EU. Brussels: COM, p. 543.

  • European Commission (2012) Action Program for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union: Final Report. Brussels: SWD(2012) 423 Final.

  • European Commission (2013) Regulatory Fitness and Performance (REFIT): Results and Next steps. Brussels: COM, (2013) 685 Final.

  • Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C. (eds.) (2012) Research Design in European Studies. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, G. and Treib, O. (2008) Three worlds of compliance or four? Journal of Common Market Studies 46(2): 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falleti, T.G. and Lynch, G.F. (2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42(9): 1143–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, R. (2003) Public management policy making in Spain, 1982–1996. International Public Management Journal 6(3): 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1998) Concatenations of mechanisms. In: P. Hedstrom and R. Swedberg (eds.) Social Mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2008) The mechanismic worldview. British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of France (2011) Simplifier la vie des usagers de l’administration. Paris, France: Conseil de Modernisation des Politiques Publiques.

  • Government of France (2013) Rapport au Premier Ministre. Mieux simplifier – La simplification collaborative. Paris, France: Mission parlamentaire de simplification de l’environnement réglementaire, administratif et fiscal des Enterprises.

  • Government of Germany (2012) A Foundation for Better Law: Five Years of Bureaucracy Reduction and Better Regulation. Berlin, Germany: Better Regulation Unit.

  • Government of Germany (2014) Better Regulation 2013: Ensuring Sustainable Successes and Preventing Additional Costs. Berlin, Germany: Better Regulation Unit.

  • Government of Italy (2013) Semplificazione amministrativa: dalle norme al risultato. Roma, Italia: Dipartimento della Funzione Pubblica.

  • Government of Italy (2014) Semplificazione: cosa chiedono i cittadini e le imprese. Roma, Italia: Dipartimento della Funzione Pubblica.

  • Government of Spain (2008) Plan de Acción para la Reducción de Cargas Administrativas. Madrid, Spain: Government of Spain.

  • Government of Spain (2014) Informe de la Unidad de Reduccion de Cargas Administrativas: 8 april 2014. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Publicas.

  • Graziano, P. and Vink, M. (eds.) (2007) Europeanization. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquot, S. (2010) The paradox of gender mainstreaming. West European Politics 33(1): 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and Taylor, C.R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998) Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies 46(5): 951–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedstrom, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds.) (1998) Social Mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (2006) Regulatory reform, capture, and the regulatory burden. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(2): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schackel, A. (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2009) High quality regulation. Public Money & Management 29(3): 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2015) Crowdsourcing and regulatory reviews. Regulation & Governance 9(1): 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds.) (2003) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (eds.) (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NKR (2013) Transparency of Costs Improved, Focus on Further Burden Reduction. Berlin, Germany: National Regulatory Control Council.

  • OECD (2000) Regulatory Reform Review in Spain. Paris, France: OECD.

  • OECD (2001) Regulatory Reform Review in Italy. Paris, France: OECD.

  • OECD (2010) Cutting Red Tape. Paris, France: OECD.

  • OECD (2014) Regulatory Compliance Costs Assessment Guidance. Paris, France: OECD.

  • Pettigrew, A. (1997) What is processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management 13(4): 337–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. (2007) Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda? Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (2012) Europeanization: The challenge of establishing causality. In: T. Exadaktylos and C. Radaelli (eds.) Research Design in European Studies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. and Meuwese, A. (2010) Hard questions,hard solutions: Proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU. West European Politics 33(1): 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. and Pasquier, R. (2007) Conceptual issues. In: P. Graziano and M.P. Vink (eds.) Europeanization. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvi, S. (2011) Continuità e sviluppi nelle politiche di semplificazione. Giornale di diritto amministrativo 7: 781–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, S. (2012) Beyond non-compliance with legal norms. In: T. Exadaktylos and C. Radaelli (eds.) Research Design in European Studies. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105–124.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulos, D.A. (2004) Southern European public bureaucracies in comparative perspective. West European Politics 27(3): 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tholoniat, L. (2010) The career of the open method of coordination. West European Politics 33(1): 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torriti, J. (2007) The standard cost model. In: S. Weatherill (ed.) Better Regulation. Oxford: Hart, pp. 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warsmann, J.L. (2009) Simplifions nos lois pour guérir un mal français – Rapport au Premier minister. Paris: La documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegrich, K. (2009) The Administrative Burden Reduction Policy Boom in Europe. London: The LSE Center for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (2008) Europeanization as program implementation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10(3): 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is the result of a common undertaking. However, the sections ‘Theoretical Background’, ‘Research Design’ and ‘Germany: A progressive consolidation of the technocratic approach’ can be directly attributed to Fabrizio Di Mascio. Sections ‘France: A shift towards the populist approach’, ‘Italy: A mix of technocracy and populist in a fragmented context’, and ‘Spain: An ineffective selective approach driven by exogenous impulses’ can be directly attributed to Alessandro Natalini. Sections ‘Introduction’, ‘European Action Program as a key context factor’ and ‘Discussion and Conclusions’ can be directly attributed to Francesco Stolfi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Italian AntiCorruption Authority (ANAC), Via Minghetti 10, Roma, 00187, Italy

    Fabrizio Di Mascio

  2. Department of Law, Parthenope University Naples, Palazzo Pacanowsky (Monte di Dio), Via Generale Parisi, 13, 80132, Naples, Italy

    Alessandro Natalini

  3. University of Nottingham, Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, Selangor Darul Ehsan, 43500, Semenyih, Malaysia

    Francesco Stolfi

Authors
  1. Fabrizio Di Mascio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro Natalini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Stolfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Di Mascio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A. & Stolfi, F. The implementation of administrative burden reduction policy: Mechanisms and contexts in the study of Europeanization. Comp Eur Polit 15, 264–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.16

Keywords

Search

Navigation