Abstract
At the beginning of this century, the European Union engaged in a discussion on the necessity to shift to softer modes of governance, less detrimental for state sovereignty, which prompted lively academic debates. But how much has actually changed in the day-to-day practice has not been systematically analysed, and the severe economic and financial crisis experienced by European countries has radically changed the conditions in which EU policies are elaborated. Reviewing recent evidence, this article questions the dichotomy between old and new governance and shows that the crisis has led to a ‘hardening’ of EU regulation in key policy areas, while in others the Commission has proved to be able to use its ‘soft powers’ in ways that buttressed its influence. As a result, the shift to soft governance has not been as radical as one might have thought.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
‘Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or havingthe character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in the Treaties, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct theperformance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Union’.
See Alter and Meunier-Aitsahalia (1994) on developments concerning the free movement of goods.
‘Letta: Rehn non può permettersi scetticismo sull'Italia’, La Repubblica, 3 December 2013.
‘Mais qui est Olli Rehn?’, Le Monde, 27 February 2012.
Author’s translation.
Euro Area Summit Statement of 29 June 2012.
References
Alter, K.J. and Meunier-Aitsahalia, S. (1994) Judicial politics in the European community: European integration and the pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon decision. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 535–561.
Bartolini, S. (2011) New modes of European governance. An Introduction. In: A. Héritier and M. Rhodes (eds.) New Modes of Governance in Europe. Governing in the Shadow of Hierarchy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18.
Benz, A. (2007) Accountable multilevel governance by the open method of coordination. European Journal of International Law 13 (4): 505–522.
Blyth, M. (2013) Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press.
Boussaguet, L. (2015) Participatory mechanisms as symbolic polcy instruments. Comparative European Politics.
Boussaguet, L. and Jacquot, S. (2009) Les nouveaux modes de gouvernance. In: R. Dehousse (ed.) Politiques européennes. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Bulmer, S. and Paterson, W.E. (2013) Germany as the EU’s reluctant hegemon? Of economic strength and political constraints. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10): 1387–1405.
Busuioc, M. (2013) Rulemaking by the European financial supervisory authorities: Walking a tight rope. European Law Journal 19 (1): 111–125.
Carbone, M. (2008) Theory and practice of participation: Civil society and EU development policy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9 (2): 241–255.
Cini, M. (2001) The soft law approach: Commission rule-making in the EU’s state aid. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (2): 192–207.
Commission (2001) European Governance: A White Paper, COM Doc 428, 25 July 2001.
Copeland, P. and James, S. (2014) Policy windows, ambiguity and commission entrepreneurship: Explaining the relaunch of the European Union’s economic reform agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (1): 1–19.
Cram, L. (2011) In the Shadow of Hierarchy : Governance as a Tool of Government. In: R. Dehousse (ed.) The Community Method. Obstinate or Obsolete? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dehousse, R. (ed.) (2004) L’Europe sans Bruxelles? Une analyse de la méthode ouverte de coordination. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Dehousse, R. (2011) The Community Method. Obstinate or Obsolete? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dehousse, R. (2013) The Politics of Delegation in the European Union. Paris: Centre d’Etudes Européennes de Sciences Po. Cahiers européens de Sciences Po, 04/2013.
Dehousse, R. et al (2006) Elargissement. Comment l'Europe s'adapte. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Dehousse, R. and Boussaguet, L. (2014) L'impact de ka crise sur la gouvernance européenne. Pouvoirs 149: 7–18.
De Larosière Group (2009) The High Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU. Brussels, Belgium: De Larosière Group, 25 February.
Diedrich, U., Reiners, W. and Wessels, W. (2011) New modes of governance. Policy developments and the hidden steps of EU integration. In: A. Héritier and M. Rhodes (eds.) New Modes of Governance in Europe. Governing in the Shadow of Hierarchy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–47.
Ehlermann, C.-D. (1983–1984) How flexible is community law? An unusual approach to the concept of ‘two speeds’. Michigan Law Review 82 (1–2): 1274–1293.
Fabbrini, S. (2013) Intergovernmentalism and its limits. Assessing the European Union’s answer to the euro crisis. Comparative European Politics 46 (9): 1003–1029.
Forêt, F. (2007) Un discours sans maître. Livre blanc sur la gouvernance et rhétorique politique européenne. In: D. Georgakakis and M. de Lassalle (eds.) La « nouvelle gouvernance européenne ». Genèse et usages d’un livre blanc. Strasbourg, France: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, pp. 149–173.
Garzon, I. (2006) Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy: History of a Paradigm Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Georgakakis, D. (2007) La gouvernance de la gouvernance. La politique du livre blanc et les paradoxes du leasership de la Commission européenne. In: D. Georgakakis and M. de Lassalle (eds.) La « nouvelle gouvernance européenne ». Genèse et usages d’un livre blanc. Strasbourg, France: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, pp. 175–206.
Hall, P. (2012) The economics and politics of the euro crisis. German Politics 21 (4): 355–371.
Hayward (2007) Leaderless Europe. Oxford University Press.
Heibreder, E.G. (2012) Civil Society Participation in EU Governance. Living Rev. Euro. Gov. 7, 2. http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2012-2, accessed 28 February 2014.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.
Hüller, T. (2010) Playground or democratisation? New participatory procedures at the European commission. Swiss Political Science Review 16 (1): 77–107.
Kassim, H. and Menon, A. (2003) Les Etats membres de l’UE et la Commission Prodi. Revue française de science politique 53 (4): 491–501.
Kassim, H. et al (2013) The European Commission of the XXIst Century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kurpas, S., Gron, C. and Kaczynski, P.M. (2008) The European Commission after enlargement: Does more add up to less? Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies. CEPS Special Report.
Lascoumes, P. and le Galès, P. (eds.) (2004) Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Majone, G. (2001a) The two logics of delegation: Agency and fiduciary relations in EU Governance. European Union Politics 2 (1): 103–122.
Majone, G. (2001b) Ideas, Interests and institutional change: The commission debates the delegation problem .Cahiers européens de Sciences Po, 04/2001.
Majone, G. (2005) Dilemmas of European Integration. The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Manow, P., Schäfer, A. and Zorn, H. (2007) Europe’s party-political center of gravity, 1957–2003. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (1): 20–39.
Pochet, P. (2011) Social Europe: Why hard law remains important. In: R. Dehousse (ed.) The Community Method. Obstinate or Obsolete? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollack, M. (2003) The Engines of European Integration, Delegation, Agency and Agenda-Setting in the EU. Oxford University Press.
Ponzano, P., Hernanin, C. and Corona, D. (2012) The Power of Initiative of the European Commission. A Progressive Erosion. Paris: Notre Europe Jacques Delors Institute. Notre Europe Studies & Research n° 89.
Puetter, U. (2012) Europe’s deliberative intergovernmentalism: The role of the council and European council in EU economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (2): 161–178.
Radaelli, C. and Meuwese, A.C.M. (2010) Hard questions, hard solutions: Proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU. West European Politics 33 (1): 136–153.
Quaglia, L. (2013) Financial regulation and supervision in the European Union after the crisis. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 16 (1): 17–30.
Quittkat, C. and Finke, B. (2008) The EU commission consultation regime. In: B. Kohler-Koch, D. de Bièvre and W. Moloney (eds.) Opening EU-Governance to Civil Society – Gains and Challenges. Mannheim: Connex CONNEX Report Series No. 5, pp. 183–222.
Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J. (2008) Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the European union. European Law Journal 14 (3): 271–327.
Salines, M., Glöckler, G. and Truchlewski, Z. (2012) Existensial crisis, incremental response: The eurozone’s dual institutional evolution 2007–2011. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5): 665–681.
Snyder, F. (1994) Soft law and institutional practice in the European community. In: S. J. Martin (ed.) The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honor of Emile Noël, Deventer Kluwer, pp. 197–225.
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P.C. (1991) From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: Organized interests in the single European market. Politics and Society 19 (2): 133–164.
Szyszczak, E. (2013) Soft law and safe heavens. In: U. Neergaard, E. Szyszczak, J.W. van de Gronden and M. Krajewsku (eds.) Social Services of General Interest in the EU. Legal Issues of Services of General Interest. The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 317–345.
Tömmel, I. and Verdun, A. (2009) Innovative Governance in the European Union: The Politics of Multi-Level Policymaking. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
Van Ingelgom, V. (2014) Integrating Indifference. A Comparative, Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to the Legitimacy of European Integration. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
Van Rompuy, H. (2013) L’idée européenne, une convergence d’intérêts, un choix de valeurs. La Revue des deux mondes, September, pp.15–31.
Veron, N. (2011) London and the new European Supervisory Authorities. Financial World. 7 April.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dehousse, R. Has the European Union moved towards soft governance?. Comp Eur Polit 14, 20–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.7