Skip to main content
Log in

Reforming China's SOEs: An Overview

  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After three decades of reform, state ownership still plays a significant if diminishing role in China's industrial sector. We survey studies that focus on the impact of reform on China's SOEs both during the early reform years from 1979 to 1992 and during the years of privatisation and corporatisation since 1993. Most studies find evidence that reforms led to productivity growth in both periods, with both the performance gap and the formal distinction between SOEs and non-SOEs appearing to narrow since the late 1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The estimated 12-fold increase in GDP plus Naughton's constant price estimates of industry's output shares at the beginning and end of the period implies that industrial output grew 19-fold. Note that the data indicate far less structural change if current prices, which were artificially high for industry and low for agriculture in 1978, are used.

  2. China Statistical Yearbook 2006, Chapter 5. An incomplete and subsequently discontinued series shows that manufacturing workforce increased from 53 million in 1978 to 83 million in 2002.

  3. A caveat is that, as pointed out by Jefferson and Su (2006), just as many enterprises no longer called state-owned have the state as their largest or majority shareholder, so too some enterprises officially classified as state-owned have only a minority of assets owned by the state. To quote Jefferson and Su (p. 148): ‘The association between formal ownership classification and the ownership structure of the assets has become increasingly fluid.’

  4. If non-circulating shares are included and assumed to be of equal value, the companies traded would have been valued at closer to 18% of GDP in that year.

  5. Yusuf et al., p. 89.

  6. On the application of the ‘market socialist’ concept to China, see Kornai and Qian, eds. (2008). Ironically, the Chinese government itself did not adopt the term ‘socialist market economy’ until after this period had ended and policies were shifting in the direction of still more private ownership.

  7. As an example of the phasing out of planned allocation, Naughton (2007, p. 93) reports that in the steel industry, the proportion of output allocated by the central government fell to 50% in 1984 and to 7% in 1995.

  8. A total of 70.6% in 1995, of which 34.0% was due to state enterprises, and 36.6% to collective ones (including TVEs).

  9. Commentaries along the lines mentioned include Weitzman and Xu (1994), and Ellerman and Stiglitz (2001). For an interpretive essay on why China experimented with ‘market socialist’ forms before moving further toward private property rights, see Putterman (2008).

  10. Share Right Split refers to a process of negotiation between tradable shareholders and the holders of non-tradable shares to set rates of parity between newly released and already traded shares, or to provide alternative forms of compensation, so as to protect incumbent shareholders from suffering declines in wealth as new shares come on the market. On the predicted time-line of transition to full tradability, see Ahn and Cogman (2007).

  11. Interestingly, they also show productivity to be growing rapidly (at between 3.3% and 5.1%) during 1953–1957, the years of China's Soviet-style and Soviet-aided First Five-Year Plan. Much the same paradox exists for China's agricultural performance data, where the fastest growth rates are registered during 1953–1957, years of gradual collectivisation and imposition of state agricultural procurement, and 1978–1984, years of market liberalisation and decollectivisation of farm production.

  12. This survey was conducted by the Economic Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Science. It covers 769 state-owned enterprises over the years 1980–1989. The central government directly managed 9% of the sample enterprises, provincial governments 10%, municipal governments 72%, and county governments the remaining 9%. Firms were surveyed in four provinces – Jiangsu, Jilin, Shanxi, and Sichuan – that together contributed over 20% of China's industrial output at the time.

  13. Although the years in question fall in the second stage of our reform periodisation, the reported profits are nevertheless indicative of the trends that motivated changes that began to be adopted in 1994 but the effects of which would not be felt until the late 1990s.

  14. The SOE share of total industrial output had declined from 77% in 1978 to 33% in 1996; see Naughton (2007, p. 300).

  15. While reliable estimates for the mid-1990s are hard to come by, a careful estimate of the total non-performing loans of China's main banks, including loans already taken off the books of the banks and given over to asset management companies tasked with cleaning up the problem, equaled about 42% of outstanding bank loans or 35% of GDP in 2001. See Ma and Fung (2002).

  16. Holz (2003, p. 194) argues that once one controls for higher capital intensity and taxes, SOE profitability actually exceeded that of non-SOEs.

  17. The starting point of the sample used differs from that of Jefferson and Su in that it includes all SOEs and all non-SOEs with over five million RMB in annual sales, a somewhat larger category than the set of medium and large enterprises.

  18. Hu et al. (2004) also study the 736 enterprise data set, examining the determinants of total factor productivity, value-added, sales, profits, and employment. They find that SOE classification and a low proportion of privately owned shares negatively affect performance, and that operating in a more competitive industry positively affects performance among SOEs but has a weaker or no effect for non-SOEs.

  19. That is having the state as largest shareholder.

  20. Owing to this focus, she discards firms that undertook more than one change of ownership form during the sample period, some 20% of the sample.

  21. Estimated by the authors from Wind Info China Financial Database and China Statistical Yearbook 2005, Chapter 14. Here, state-controlled means having the state as largest shareholder, and designated size means having annual sales above five million RMB.

  22. Foreign-owned tradable shares as of 2002 consisted of those traded in China's B share market and those traded in Hong Kong, known as H shares.

  23. Although observers have often suggested that the vast majority of participants are uninformed ‘retail’ investors and have compared the markets to casinos, Li (2008b) finds stock prices to be highly responsive to information, in particular promptly upgrading performance expectations upon publication of news that shares of a company's stock had been purchased by a foreign-owned qualified institutional investor.

  24. Calculations based on the estimates of the log of MFP by sector shown in their Table 5.

  25. Most of these profits were attributable to the 176 large SOEs run by the Central SASAC. (Calculations from China Statistical Yearbook 2006, Chapter 14 with additional information on large SOEs from Xinhua News Agency (2005).) ‘Grasping the large’ has turned out, thus far, to mean holding on to the goose that lays the golden eggs.

References

  • Ahn, J and Cogman, D . 2007: A quiet revolution in China's capital markets. McKinsey quarterly perspectives on corporate finance and strategy 24 (Summer): 18–24 http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/PDFDownload.aspx?L2=5&L3=0&ar=2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C-En, Liu, Q, Lu, J, Song, F and Zhang, JX . 2004: Corporate governance and market valuation in China. Journal of Comparative Economics 32: 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C-en, Lu, JY and Tao, ZG . 2008: How does privatization work in China? MPRA paper no. 6599, posted 06 January 2008.

  • Byrd, WA . 1989: Plan and market in the Chinese economy: A simple general equilibrium model. Journal of Comparative Economics 13 (2): 177–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E and Wong, S . 2004: Political control and performance in China's listed firms. Journal of Comparative Economics 32: 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G-M, Firth, M and Rui, O . 2006: Have China's enterprise reforms led to improved efficiency and profitability? Emerging Markets Review 7 (1): 82–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K, Wang, HC, Zheng, YX, Jefferson, GJ and Rawski, TG . 1988: Productivity change in Chinese industry: 1953–1985. Journal of Comparative Economics 12 (4): 570–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Financial Database. Shanghai Wind Information Technological Service Corp. Ltd, http://www.wind.com.cn/en/home.html.

  • Delios, A and Wu, ZJ . 2005: Legal person ownership, diversification strategy and firm profitability in China. Journal of Management and Governance 9: 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A, Wu, ZJ and Zhou, N . 2006: A new perspective on ownership identities in China's listed companies. Management and Organization Review 2 (3): 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, XY, Putterman, L and Unel, B . 2006: Enterprise restructuring an firm performance: A comparison of rural and urban enterprises in Jiangsu province. Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (3): 608–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, XY and Xu, LC . 2008: The impact of China's millennium labor restructuring program on firm performance and employee earnings. Economics of Transition 16 (2): 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, D and Stiglitz, J . 2001: Not poles apart: “Whither Reform?” and “Whence Reform?”. Journal of Policy Reform 4 (4): 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, JPH, Wong, TJ and Zhang, TY . 2007: Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China's partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics 84 (2): 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, XL and Balasubramanyam, VN . 2003: Township and village enterprises in China. Journal of Development Studies 39 (4): 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R, Song, LG, Tenev, S and Yao, Y . 2005: China's ownership transformation: Process, outcomes, prospects. The World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S . 2003: Two-thirds privatization': How China's listed companies are finally privatizing. The Royal Institute of International Affairs Asia Programme Working paper.

  • Groves, T, Hong, YM, McMillan, J and Naughton, B . 1994: Autonomy and incentives in Chinese state enterprises. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (1): 183–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T, Hong, YM, McMillan, J and Naughton, B . 1995: China's evolving managerial labor market. Journal of Political Economy 103 (4): 873–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holz, CA . 2003: China's industrial state-owned enterprises between profitability and bankruptcy. World Scientific: Riveredge, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, YF, Song, F and Zhang, JX . 2004: Competition, ownership, corporate governance and enterprise performance: evidence from China. Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy Working paper 1111.

  • Huang, SA and Huang, LJ . 1998: A further analysis of the “Zhucheng phenomenon.” (Zhucheng Xianxiang Zaixi). Gaige 2: 38–47, (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, GH, Rawski, TG and Zheng, YX . 1992: Growth, efficiency, and convergence in China's state and collective industry. Economic Development and Cultural Change 40: 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, GH, Rawski, TG and Zheng, YX . 1994: Productivity change in Chinese industry: a comment. China Economic Review 5 (2): 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, GH, Rawski, TG and Zheng, YX . 1996: Chinese industrial productivity: trends, measurement issues, and recent developments. Journal of Comparative Economics 23 (2): 146–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, GH, Rawski, TG and Zhang, Y . 2008: Productivity growth and convergence across China's industrial economy. Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies 6: 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, GH and Singh, I (eds) 1998: Enterprise reform in China: Ownership, transition, and performance. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, GH and Su, J . 2006: Privatization and restructuring in China: Evidence from shareholding ownership, 1995–2001. Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (1): 146–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, J, Sun, Q and Tong, W . 2005: Privatization via an oversea listing: Evidence from China's H-Share firms. Financial Management Autumn 2005: 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T and Long, C . 2006: CEO turnover, firm performance, and enterprise reform in China: Evidence from micro data. Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (4): 796–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J and Qian, Y (eds) 2008: Market and socialism in light of the experiences of China and Vietnam. Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardy, NR . 2001: China's worsening debts. Brookings Working paper, 22 June 2001, http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2001/0622china_lardy.aspx.

  • Lau, L, Qian, Y and Roland, G . 2000: Reform without losers: An interpretation of China's dual track approach to transition. Journal of Political Economy 108 (1): 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K . 1990: The Chinese model of the socialist enterprise: An assessment of its organization and performance. Journal of Comparative Economics 14 (3): 384–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, DH, Moshirian, F, Nguyen, P and Tan, L-w . 2007: Managerial ownership and firm performance: Evidence from China's privatization. Research in International Business and Finance 21 (3): 396–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W . 1997: The impact of economic reform on the performance of Chinese state enterprises, 1980–1989. Journal of Political Economy 105 (5): 1080–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, WY . 2008a: The second wave of reform: On the effects of enterprise restructuring in China, 1995–2001. Brown University PhD Dissertation Chapter.

  • Li, WY . 2008b: Does money chase money: Estimating the signaling effects of qualified foreign institutional investors in China's Domestic stock markets. Brown University PhD Dissertation Chapter.

  • Liu, GS and Sun, P . 2003: Identifying ultimate controlling shareholders in Chinese public corporations: An empirical study. Asia Programme Working paper no. 2.

  • Liu, GS and Sun, P . 2005: The class of shareholdings and its impacts on corporate performance: A case of state shareholding composition in Chinese public corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (1): 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G and Fung, BSC . 2002: China's asset management corporations. Bank for International Settlements Working papers no. 115.

  • National Bureau of Statistics. various years: China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing.

  • Naughton, B . 1992: Implications of the state monopoly over industry and its relaxation. Modern China 18 (1): 14–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B . 1995: Growing out of the plan: Chinese economic reform, 1978–1993. Cambridge University Press: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B . 2007: The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putterman, L . 2008: China's encounter with market socialism: Approaching managed capitalism by indirect means. In: Kornai, J and Qian, Y (eds). Market and Socialism In Light of the Experiences of China and Vietnam. Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, DQ, Wu, W and Zhang, H . 2000: Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from Listed Chinese companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 8 (5): 587–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X . 2006: The world distribution of income: Falling poverty and convergence, period. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 351–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, MM and Xu, LXC . 2001: Empirical effects of performance-contracts: Evidence from China. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (1): 168–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, LG and Yao, Y . 2004: Impacts of privatization on firm performance in China. CCER Working paper E2004005.

  • Sprayregen, JHMPC, Friedland, JP, Miller, NS and Li, C . 2004: Non-performing loans in China: A potential win-win opportunity for foreign investors and China's economy. Financial World Global Restructuring and Insolvency Review 2004: 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q and Tong, WHS . 2003: China share issue privatization: The extent of its success. Journal of Financial Economics 70 (2): 183–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q, Tong, WHS and Tong, J . 2002: How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China's privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29 (2002): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, LH and Estrin, S . 2008: Retained shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does government ownership always reduce corporate value? Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (2008): 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, XZ, Xu, LXC and Zhu, T . 2004: State-owned enterprises going public: The case of China. Economics of Transition 12 (3): 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, ZB, Varela, O, D'Souza, J and Hassan, K . 2003: The financial and operating performance of China's newly privatized firms. Financial Management 32: 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M and Xu, CG . 1994: Chinese township-village enterprises as vaguely defined cooperatives. Journal of Comparative Economics 18 (2): 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, WT, Fan, G, Hai, W and Jin, Y . 1993: The efficiency and macroeconomic consequences of Chinese enterprise reform. China Economic Review 4 (2): 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, WT, Hai, W, Jin, Y and Fan, G . 1994: How successful has Chinese enterprise reform been. Journal of Comparative Economics 18: 410–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua News Agency. 2005: SOEs See 31.2% Profit Growth in 1st Quarter. 19 April 2005.

  • Xu, XN and Wang, Y . 1999: Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China Economic Review 10: 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yano, G and Shiraishi, M . 2004: Efficiency of Chinese township and village enterprises and property rights n the 1990s: Case of Wuxi. Comparative Economic Studies 46 (2004): 311–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S, Nabeshima, K and Perkins, DH . 2006: Under new ownership: privatizing China's state-owned enterprises. Stanford University Press and the World Bank: Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X . 2006: Competition, public choice, and institutional change: Searching for reasons for improved policy efficiency in institutional reform from “Managing large enterprises and cutting small ones loose”. Chinese Economy 39 (1): 5–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to Barry Naughton, Carsten Holz, Gary Jefferson, Xiao-Yuan Dong and Yao Yang for reading a draft full of what for them is old news, and for pointing out errors and providing wise counsel. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Putterman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, W., Putterman, L. Reforming China's SOEs: An Overview. Comp Econ Stud 50, 353–380 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2008.31

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2008.31

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation