Skip to main content
Log in

Central Bank Policies in Mexico: Targets, Instruments, and Performance

  • Symposium Article
  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The central argument of this paper is that in pursuing low inflation as its single and exclusive goal, and given some characteristics of the Mexican economy – a large degree of trade openness, a relatively high pass through of exchange rate movements into prices, and a low direct sensitivity of aggregate demand to interest rates – monetary policy has generated a recurrent tendency toward real exchange rate appreciation with very adverse effects on economic growth. The paper also examines central bank’s intervention in the foreign exchange market and the effectiveness of sterilized intervention in affecting the real exchange rate and potentially overcoming the tendency to real appreciation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A symposium article presented at a Symposium on Latin American monetary policy.

  2. More precisely, the Foreign Exchange Commission comprises three members of the Ministry of Finance (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público (SHCP) – the Secretary and two Deputy Secretaries of the SHCP – and three members of the Banco de México – the Governor and two members of its Board of Governors. The Secretary of SHCP has the casting vote and operationally the central bank is responsible for implementing the interventions in the foreign exchange market.

  3. A list of past positions of governors and vice-governors, their academic background, and positions after leaving office is available upon demand from the author.

  4. Since 2000 the Central Bank publishes quarterly inflation reports to monitor the inflationary process, analyze inflation prospects, and discuss the conduct of monetary policy. More generally, the Banco de México has made great effort and progress in improving transparency and accountability. For example, since 2013 the minutes of the meetings of the Board of governors are made available to the public.

  5. Banco de México (2001) defines as follows the main features of this regime:(a) the recognition of price stability as the fundamental objective of monetary policy;(b) the establishment and announcement of inflation targets for the short and medium term;(c) the consolidation of an autonomous monetary authority;(d) the application of monetary policy in a transparent framework, based on a communication strategy with respect to the objectives, instruments, plans, and decisions of the monetary authority;(e) the permanent analysis of all the potential sources of inflationary pressures with the aim of evaluating the future path of inflation; and(f) the use of alternative measures of inflation, such as core inflation. This with the aim of identifying those phenomena which affect inflation transitorily as well as the medium term trend of price increases.

  6. This is the case of Martínez et al., 2001, Torres-García, 2002, Galindo and Guerrero, 2003, Ramos-Francia and Torres-García, 2005, Muñoz, 2005, Galindo and Catalán, 2009, Moura and de Carvalho, 2010, and OCDE, 2011.

  7. Muñoz (2005) uses similar specifications and finds similar results for a period that includes regimes different from inflation targeting (quarterly time series spanning the period 1982 Q1–2001Q4).

  8. Although the absence of the output gap from the Taylor rule does not imply that the output gap is absent from the loss function of the central bank, it suggests that the monetary authority gives relatively little weight to it (see Carlin and Soskice, 2006).

  9. It is worth noting that García-Iglesias et al. (2013) do not include the output gap among the explanatory variables but rather the deviation of the growth rate from its trend value.

  10. The reasons of the ‘fear to depreciate’ are similar to those of the ‘fear of floating’ (Calvo and Reinhart, 2002): the impact of depreciations on inflation and the increase in the real value of debts denominated in foreign currency that create financial difficulties for debtors and creditors.

  11. It is worth noting that this conclusion applies to the period 2002–2013, when the regime was in operation in all five countries of the IT group, but is sensitive to the particular period considered. Also, over this period, Mexico is in fact the only country in the group of inflation targeters that records a moderate real depreciation as a result of the shock of 2008–2009 (or, more precisely, Lehman’s collapse).

  12. For recent analyses of the determinants of productivity from a Young-Kaldor perspective in Mexico and Latin America, see, respectively, Ros, 2013 and 2014a, 2014b.

  13. Other factors contributing to the fall in the growth rate were a lower growth of the US economy and smaller net financial flows, while a higher real price for oil had a positive effect on growth.

  14. The creation of temporary US dollar facilities in 1995 to stabilize the foreign exchange market in the first months of 1995 and, for the same purpose, the swap line with the Federal Reserve and the flexible credit line with the IMF during the 2008–2009 crisis can also be included in this second modality.

  15. According to Siadoui (2005, p. 217): ‘In order to minimize the impact of the options scheme on the foreign exchange market, an opposite kind of intervention was designed to endow the process with some degree of symmetry. Thus, in February 1997 the Foreign Exchange Commission authorized Banco de México to undertake daily sales of up to US$0.2 billion to market participants through auctions. This mechanism was aimed at mitigating the volatility in the foreign exchange market by providing liquidity during days when uncertainty prevailed, thus discouraging some participants from engaging in speculative strategies …. it is important to underline that nearly 16% of the US$ acquired by Banco de México through the exercise of put options was recycled to the foreign exchange market via the auctioned sales’.

  16. For surveys see Sarno (2005) and Engel (2013).

  17. Although, strictly speaking, the Central Bank could adopt policies more favorable to growth without having to change the constitutional mandate, it seems improbable that it would attempt to do so.

References

  • Aizenman, J, Hutchison, M and Noy, I . 2010: Inflation targeting and real exchange rates in emerging markets. World Development 39 (5): 712–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banco de México. 1996: Informe anual. Banco de México: Mexico City.

  • Banco de México. 2001: Programa Monetario 2001, Banco de México: Mexico City.

  • Banco de México. 2002: Informe Anual 2002, Banco de México: Mexico City.

  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 2013: Triennial central bank survey of turnover in foreign exchange markets. BIS: Basel, Switzerland.

  • Berg, A, Ostry, JD and Zettelmeyer, J . 2012: What makes growth sustained? Journal of Development Economics 98 (2): 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berganza, JC and Broto, C . 2012: Flexible inflation targets, forex interventions and exchange rate volatility in emerging countries. Journal of International Money and Finance 31 (2): 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B, Gertler, M and Gilchrist, S . 1999: The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In: Taylor, JB and Woodford, YM (eds). Handbook of Macroeconomics. Vol. 1. Elsevier.

  • Blecker, R . 2009: External shocks, structural change, and economic growth in Mexico, 1979–2007. World Development 37 (7): 1274–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bofinger, P and Wollmershauser, T . 2001: Managed floating: Understanding the new international monetary order, CEPR Discussion Paper 3064, United Kingdom.

  • Broto, C . 2013: The effectiveness of forex interventions in four Latin American countries. Emerging Markets Review 17 (c): 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G . 1997: Monetary and exchange rate policy for Mexico. Key issues and a proposal. University of Maryland: Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G and Reinhart, C . 2002: Fear of floating. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2): 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capistrán, C and Ramos-Francia, M . 2010: Does inflation targeting affect the dispersion of inflation expectations? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 42 (1): 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, S . 2014: Distribución del ingreso, metas de inflación y crecimiento, UNAM: Mexico City, mimeo.

  • Capraro, S and Perrotini, I . 2012: Intervenciones cambiarias esterilizadas, teoría y evidencia: el caso de México, Revista de Contaduría y Administración, 2(57), abril–junio 11–44.

  • Carlin, W and Soskice, D . 2006: Macroeconomics. imperfections, institutions and policies. Oxford University Press: Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstens, A and Werner, A . 1999: Mexico’s monetary policy framework under a floating exchange rate regime. Documento de Investigación No. 90–05. Banco de México: Dirección General de Investigación Económica, mayo: Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casar, J and Ros, J . 2004: ¿Por qué no crecemos?, Nexos, octubre.

  • Castellanos, SG . 2000: El efecto del ‘corto’ sobre la estructura de tasas de interés, Banco de México, Documentos de Investigación, n. 2000–1, junio.

  • Cermeño, R, Villagómez, A and Orellana, YJ . 2012: Monetary policy rules in a small open economy: An application to Mexico. Journal of Applied Economics XV (2): 259–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mello, L and Moccero, D . 2008: Monetary policy and macroeconomic stability in Latin America: The cases of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. In: De Mello, L. (ed). Monetary Policies and Inflation Targeting in Emerging Economies. OECD Press: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domaç, I and Mendoza, A . 2004: Is there room for forex interventions under inflation targeting framework? Evidence from México and Turkey, Policy Research Working Paper 3288, World Bank: Washington DC.

  • Eichengreen, B . 2008: The real exchange rate and economic growth. Comission on Growth and Development, World Bank: Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, C . 2013: Exchange rates and interest parity, NBER Working Papers no. 19336, National Bureau of Economic Research: Massachusetts.

  • Feenstra, RC., Inklaar, R. and Timmer, MP . 2013: The next generation of the Penn World Table, available at, http://www.ggdc.net/pwt.

  • Frenkel, R . 2008: The competitive real exchange – rate regime, inflation and monetary policy. CEPAL Review 96: 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, R and Rapetti, M . 2004: Políticas macroeconómicas para el crecimiento y el empleo, paper prepared for the ILO: Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Galindo, LM and Catalán, H . 2009: El regimen de metas de inflación en México y la evidencia empírica. In: Mántey, G and López, TS. (coords.) Política Monetaria con Elevado Traspaso del Tipo de Cambio. La Experiencia Mexicana con Metas de Inflación. UNAM-Plaza y Valdés: Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, LM and Guerrero, C . 2003: La regla de Taylor para México: un análisis econométrico. Investigación Económica LXII (246): 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, LM and Ros, J . 2008: Alternatives to inflation targeting in Mexico. International Review of Applied Economics 22 (2): 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcés, D . 1999: Determinación del nivel de precios y la dinámica inflacionaria en México, Documento de Investigación 99–07, Dirección General de Investigación Económica, Banco de México: Mexico City.

  • García-Iglesias, J, Muñoz, R and Saridakis, G . 2013: Did the bank of Mexico follow a systematic behaviour in its transition to an inflation targeting regime? Applied Financial Economics 23 (14): 1205–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Verdú, S and Zerecero, M . 2013: On central bank interventions in the Mexican Peso/Dollar foreign exchange market. BIS Working Paper No. 429: Basel, Switzerland. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2390171.

  • Guimarães, R and Karacadag, C . 2004: The Empirics of foreign exchange intervention in emerging market countries: The cases of México and Turkey, IMF WP/04/123, July, Washington DC.

  • Hufner, F . 2004: Foreign exchange intervention as a monetary policy instrument. Physica-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, C . 2010: Capital flows, real exchange rate, and growth constraints in Mexico, Department of Economics, Universidad de las Américas, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Ibarra, C . 2013: Capital flows and private investment in Mexico. Universidad de las Américas, Puebla, Mexico.

  • Krugman, P . 1987: The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitiveness consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: Notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies, Journal of Development Economics 27: 41–55.

  • Lustig, N and Ros, J . 1999: Economic reforms, stabilization policies, and the ‘Mexican disease’. In Taylor, L. (ed). After Neoliberalism. University of Michigan Press: Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, L, Sánchez, O and Werner, A . 2001: Consideraciones sobre la conducción de la política monetaria y el mecanismo de transmission en México, Banco de México: Mexico City, Documentos de Investigación núm. 2001–2.

  • Mántey, G . 2009: El ‘miedo a flotar’ y la intervención esterilizada en el mercado de cambios como instrumento de la política monetaria en México. In: Mántey, G and López, YT. (coord.) Política monetaria con elevado traspaso del tipo de cambio. La experiencia mexicana con metas de inflación. UNAM: Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeguer, P . 2014: Tipo de cambio real, acumulación de capital y crecimiento económico en México, 1976–2011, Tesis de Licenciatura, UNAM: Mexico City.

  • Moura, M and de Carvalho, A . 2010: What can Taylor rules say about monetary policy in Latin America? Journal of Macroeconomics 32 (1): 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, R . 2005: Monetary policy rules and inflation targets in emerging economies: Evidence for Mexico and Israel. University of Leicester: (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogueira, R . 2007: Inflation targeting and exchange rate pass-through. Economia Aplicada 11 (2): 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCDE. 2011: Estudio Económicos de la OCDE: México, OECD Publishing, Centro de la OCDE en México.

  • Ostry, J, Gosh, A and Chamon, M . 2012: Two targets, two instruments: Monetary and exchange rate policies in emerging market economies, IMF Staff Discussion Note: Washington DC.

  • Polterovich, V and Popov, V . 2002: Accumulation of foreign exchange reserves and long term growth. In: Tabata, S. and A. Iwashita (eds), Slavic Eurasia's Integration into the World Economy, Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, New Economic School. Moscow, Russia.

  • Ramos-Francia, M and Torres-García, A . 2005: Reducción de la inflación a través de un esquema de metas de inflación: la experiencia mexicana, Banco de México: Mexico City, Documentos de Investigación núm. 2005–01.

  • Rapetti, M . 2011: Policy coordination in a competitive real exchange rate strategy for development. University of Massachussets at Amherst: Massachusetts, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapetti, M . 2012: Real exchange rate levels and economic growth: Some reflections on the possible channels. Buenos Aires: CEDES, mimeo.

  • Ros, J . 1996: Después de la crisis: la política económica, Nexos, octubre.

  • Ros, J . 2001: Del auge de capitales a la crisis financiera y más allá: México en los noventa. In: Ffrench-Davis, R (ed). Crisis financieras en países ‘exitosos’. CEPAL-McGraw Hill: Santiago de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, J . 2013: Algunas tesis equivocadas sobre el estancamiento económico de México. Colegio de México-UNAM: Ciudad de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, J . 2014a: Productividad y crecimiento en América Latina. CEPAL-México: Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, J . 2014b: The real exchange rate, the real wage and growth: A formal analysis of the ‘development channel’, UNAM: Mexico City, Mimeo.

  • Ros, J and Skott, P . 1998: Dynamic effects of trade liberalization and currency overvaluation under conditions of increasing returns. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 66 (4): 466–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, L . 2005: Viewpoint: Towards a solution to the puzzles in exchange rate economics: Where do we stand? Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (3): 673–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Hebbel, K and Werner, A . 2002: Inflation targeting in Brazil, Chile and Mexico: Performance, credibility and the exchange rate. Economía 2 (2): 31–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidaoui, J . 2005: Central banking intervention under a floating exchange rate regime: Ten years of Mexican experience. BIS Papers 24 (May): 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidaoui, J and Ramos-Francia, M . 2008: The monetary transmission mechanism in Mexico: Recent developments. Bank of International Settlements: Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L . 2010: Inflation targeting. Massachusetts: NBER Working Paper 16654.

  • Torres-García, A . 2002: Un análisis de las tasas de interés en México a través de la metodología de reglas monetarias, Banco de México: Mexico City, Documentos de Investigación núm. 2002–11.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to two anonymous referees, Nelson Barbosa, Santiago Capraro, Mario Damill, Roberto Frenkel, Guadalupe Mántey, Martín Rapetti, and participants at the Buenos Aires workshop for comments on a previous version of this paper. I am also grateful to Paul Wachtel for editorial revisions. Claudia Córdova and Luis Angel Monroy Gomez Franco provided excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ros, J. Central Bank Policies in Mexico: Targets, Instruments, and Performance. Comp Econ Stud 57, 483–510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2015.6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2015.6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation