Abstract
A framework proposed by McMahon and Banyard outlines the opportunities college students have to engage in prosocial helping behaviors before, during or after an incident of sexual assault or dating abuse. To build on this framework, this study (i) used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to test the proposed framework and (ii) examined the correlates associated with student behaviors along a continuum of opportunities to prevent or respond to these types of crimes in a college setting. The structural equation model results demonstrated that there are different factors associated with whether students engaged in behaviors to prevent sexual assault or dating abuse, whether they engaged in prosocial behaviors after an incident of violence or whether they intervened in risky situations involving alcohol. Observing others engage in similar prosocial behaviors was the most consistent predictor. Past victimization and respondent sex were also associated with different types of interventions. Practical implications of these findings are addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This scale was reduced by the instrument’s authors (Coker et al, 2011) to minimize the length of the survey.
General guidelines for model fit are a relatively low χ2 that is not statistically significant; RMSEA⩽0.05, TLI>0.95, CFI>0.95 and for CFA models, WRMR<0.90 (see Brown, 2006). Although the χ2 is considered the ‘classic goodness-of-fit index’, it is not reported because of many criticisms (Brown, 2006).
These adjustments were made to avoid biased parameter estimates and incorrect standard errors (Davey and Salva, 2010).
References
Abbey, A. (2002) Alcohol-related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement 14: 118–128.
Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Banyard, V. (2008) Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims 23 (1): 83–97.
Banyard, V. (2014) Improving college campus-based prevention of violence against women: A strategic plan for research built on multipronged practices and policies. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 15 (4): 339–351.
Banyard, V. and Moynihan, M. (2011) Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence 1 (4): 287–301.
Banyard, V., Plante, E. and Moynihan, M. (2004) Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology 32 (1): 61–79.
Banyard, V., Plante, E. and Moynihan, M. (2005) Rape Prevention Through Bystander Education: Bringing a Broader Community Perspective to Sexual Violence Prevention. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Basile, K. and Smith, S. (2011) Sexual violence victimization of women: Prevalence, characteristics and the role of public health and prevention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 5 (5): 407–417.
Beeble, M., Post, L., Bybee, D. and Sullivan, C. (2008) Factors related to willingness to help survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 23 (12): 1713–1729.
Berkowitz, A. (2003) Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. In: H. Perkins (ed.) The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors and Clinicians. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 259–279.
Bowen, N. and Guo, S. (2012) Structural Equation Modeling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brecklin, L. and Ullman, S. (2002) The roles of victim and offender alcohol use in sexual assaults: Results from the national violence against women survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 63 (1): 57–63.
Brown, A. and Messman-Moore, T. (2010) Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students’ willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25 (3): 503–517.
Brown, T.A. (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
Burn, S. (2009) A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles 60 (11): 779–792.
Burrell, A. and Erol, R. (2009) Tackling violence in the night-time economy on the ground: Putting policy into practice in England and Wales. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 11 (3): 189–203.
Cantalupo, N.C. (2014) Institution-specific victimization surveys addressing legal and practical disincentives to gender-based violence reporting on college campuses. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 15 (3): 227–241.
Chabot, H., Tracy, T., Manning, C. and Poisson, C. (2009) Sex, attribution and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 24 (10): 1696–1712.
Cohen, L. and Felson, M. (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–608.
Coker, A. et al (2011) Evaluation of green dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women 17 (6): 777–796.
Coker, A. et al (2014) Evaluation of the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women. Published online before print, doi: 10.1177/1077801214545284.
Darley, J. and Latané, B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (4): 377–383.
Davey, A. and Salva, J. (2010) Statistical Power Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Routledge.
Dillman, D., Smyth, J. and Christian, L. (2009) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Eagly, A. and Crowley, M. (1986) Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin 100 (3): 283–308.
Fisher, B., Cullen, F. and Turner, M. (2000) The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Fisher, B., Daigle, L. and Cullen, F. (2010) Unsafe in the Ivory Tower: The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Gansburg, M. (1964) Thirty-eight who saw murder didn’t call the police. The New York Times 27 March, http://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/scraig/gansberg.html.
Hart, T. and Miethe, T. (2008) Exploring bystander presence and intervention in nonfatal violent victimization: When does helping really help? Violence & Victims 23 (5): 637–651.
Katz, J. and Moore, J. (2013) Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victim 28 (6): 1054–1067.
Krebs, C., Lindquist, C., Warner, T., Fisher, B. and Martin, S. (2007) The Campus Sexual Assault Study. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Laner, M., Benin, M. and Ventrone, N. (2001) Bystander attitudes toward victims of violence: Who’s worth helping? Deviant Behavior 22 (1): 23–42.
Langford, L. (2004) Preventing Violence and Promoting Safety in Higher Education Settings: Overview of a Comprehensive Approach. Waltham, MA: Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention.
Latané, B. and Darley, J. (1970) The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t he Help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lombardi, K. (2010) Sex crimes on campus: Yearlong investigation finds failure of the justice system. Investigative Reporters and Editors, Inc.: The IRE Journal 33 (3): 23–25.
McMahon, S. (2010) Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health 59 (1): 3–11.
McMahon, S. and Banyard, V. (2012) When can i help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence and Abuse 13 (3): 3–14.
McMahon, S., Palmer, J., Banyard, V., Murphy, M. and Gidycz, C. (2015) Measuring bystander behavior in the context of sexual violence prevention: Lessons learned and new directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Published online before print, doi: 10.1177/0886260515591979.
McMahon, S., Postmus, J. and Koenick, R. (2011) Engaging bystanders: A primary prevention approach to sexual violence on campus. Journal of College Student Development 15: 115–130.
Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (1998-2012) Mplus User’s Guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
O’Leary, D., Woodin, E. and Fritz, P. (2006) Can we prevent the hitting? Recommendations for preventing intimate partner violence between young adults. Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma 13 (3–4): 121–178.
Payne, D., Lonsway, K. and Fitzgerald, L. (1999) Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality 33 (1): 27–68.
Rush, B., Gliksman, L. and Brook, R. (1986) Alcohol availability, alcohol consumption and alcohol-related damage: The distribution of consumption model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 47 (1): 1–10.
Waller, M. et al (2011) Relationships among alcohol outlet density, alcohol use, and intimate partner violence victimization among young women in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27 (10): 2062–2086.
White House (2014) Not alone: The first report of the White House task force to protect students from sexual assault, https://www.notalone.gov/assets/report.pdf.
Widaman, K. (2012) Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In: H. Cooper (ed.) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Data Analysis and Research Publication. Vol. 3. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Willson, P. et al (2000) Severity of violence against women by intimate partners and associated use of alcohol and/or illicit drugs by the perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 15 (9): 996–1008.
Worthington, R.L. and Whittaker, T. (2006) Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practice. The Counseling Psychologist 34 (6): 806–838.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, J. Recognizing the continuum of opportunities for third parties to prevent and respond to sexual assault and dating violence on a college campus. Crime Prev Community Saf 18, 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2015.18
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2015.18