Abstract
Ever since the publication in 1719 of Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, the novel’s eponymous protagonist has had a pervasive presence in the modern social and cultural imaginary, giving rise to an entire literary genre known as Robinsonades. In Anti-Dühring (1877), Friedrich Engels identifies such a Robinsonade in the work of Eugen von Dühring, the target of his polemic, and draws on it for a critique of ahistorical theories of violence. The particular version of the Robinsonade Engels ascribes to Dühring is fabricated, yet a close examination of this fabrication suggests that it serves important analytic and interpretive purposes. Ironically, Engels’s critique of Robinsonades is so compelling that it ends up undermining his own tendency to economic and technological reductionism. Despite Engels’s attempts to distance himself from the Robinsonade he projects onto Dühring, the Crusoe story acts as a fraught supplement to his own theory of violence. In particular, it reveals the tensions in his work between, on the one hand, economic and technological reductionism, and on the other hand, attention to social, cultural and symbolic forces without which no plausible history of violence can be written.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Sozialistische Arbeiterpartei was founded in 1875 on the basis of the Gotha program (see Karl Marx, ‘Critique of the Gotha Programme’, MECW 24, pp. 75–99) to unite the German Labor movement following the split between the followers of Ferdinand Lassalle, grouped in the Allgemeiner Deutscher Arbeiterverein (founded in 1863) and those of August Bebel and Wilhelm Liebknecht, who were associated in the Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei (founded in 1869 in the town of Eisenach, hence the party is also known as the Eisenacher).
Wilhelm Liebknecht to Engels, 1 February 1875; Liebknecht to Engels, 21 April 1875 (MEGA I/27, pp. 685–686).
Although Marx offered some notes as a contribution to the book, the extent to which he approved of Engels’s text remains controversial. In the secondary literature today, few accept the claim by the editors of the MEGA (1988), that Anti-Dühring consolidates Marx and Engels’s research (MEGA I/27, p. 16*) or, as Merkel (1985), the managing editor of the volume, proposed that the book had been written in ‘unmittelbarer Zusammenarbeit mit Marx’. Critics, notably Thomas (1976) and Carver (1980, 1984, 2003), have pointed to the fact that Marx’s contribution was only mentioned in the preface to the second edition of Anti-Dühring, published after Marx’s death. In contrast, Welty (1983) and Stanley and Zimmermann (1984) contend that in the absence of any explicit dissociation on behalf of Marx, there is no reason to assume a disagreement.
For details, see the editorial comments in MEGA I/27, pp. 695–697. Engels’s personal copy of the first edition of the Cursus (IML/Berlin, Sign. Ma719) is part of the Marx–Engels Archive located in the SAPMO collection in the Bundesarchiv in Berlin. His copy of the second edition is located in the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History in Moscow (RGASPI 1/1/3725).
Adamiak (1974, p. 110) argues that Dühring ‘stood to the left of Marx and Engels’ and that Engels purposely ‘misrepresents Dühring’ in order to reverse their positions.
References
Adamiak, R. (1974) Marx, Engels, and Duhring. Journal of the History of Ideas 35 (1): 98–112.
Albrecht, G. (1927) Eugen Dühring: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Sozialwissenschaften. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
Avineri, S. (1968) The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Balibar, É. (2010) Violence et civilité: Wellek Library Lectures et autres essais de philosophie politique. Paris: Galilée.
Ballantyne, R.M. (1858) The Coral Island: A Tale of the Pacific Ocean. London: T. Nelson and Sons.
Bastiat, F. (2007 [1845]) Economic sophisms. Translated by P.J. Stirling In: M. Thornton (ed.) The Bastiat Collection. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Bell, I.A. (1988) King Crusoe: Locke’s political theory in Robinson Crusoe. English Studies 69 (1): 27–36.
von Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1930 [1890]) The Positive Theory of Capital. Translated by W. Smart. New York: G.E. Stechert & Co.
Callinicos, A. (2006) G.A. Cohen and the critique of political economy. Science & Society 70 (2): 252–274.
Carey, H.C. (1837) Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Carey, Lea, and Blanchard.
Carver, T. (1980) Marx, Engels and dialectics. Political Studies 28 (3): 353–363.
Carver, T. (1982) Marx’s Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carver, T. (1984) Marx, Engels and scholarship. Political Studies 32 (2): 249–256.
Carver, T. (2003) Engels: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coetzee, J.M. (1986) Foe. London: Penguin.
Cohen, G.A. (1978) Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cooper, J.F. (1847) Mark’s Reef, or the Crater: A Tale of the Pacific. Paris: Baudry’s European Library.
Defoe, D. (1994 [1719]) Robinson Crusoe. New York: W.W. Norton.
Dühring, E. (1866) Kritische Grundlegung der Volkswirthschaftslehre. Berlin: Albert Eichhoff.
Dühring, E. (1875a) Cursus der Philosophie als streng wissenschaftlicher Weltanschauung und Lebensgestaltung. Leipzig: Erich Koschney, (L. Heimann’s Verlag).
Dühring, E. (1875b) Kritische Geschichte der Nationalökonomie und des Socialismus. Berlin: Theobald Grieben.
Dühring, E. (1876) Cursus der National- und Socialökonomie. Berlin: Fues’s Verlag, (R. Reisland).
Edgeworth, F.Y. (1881) Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. London: Kegan Paul.
Fisher, C. (2005) The Robinsonade: An intercultural history of an idea. In: M.E. Novak and C. Fisher (eds.) Approaches to Teaching Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
Gellner, E. (1979) Spectacles and Predicaments: Essays in Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gilroy, P. (2006) Multiculturalism and post-colonial theory. In: J.S. Dryzek, B. Honig and A. Phillips (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gossen, H.H. (1854) Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs und der daraus fliessenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln. Brunswick: Vieweg.
Grapard, U. (1995) Robinson Crusoe: The quintessential economic man? Feminist Economics 1 (1): 33–52.
Grapard, U. and Hewitson, G. (eds.) (2011) Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man: A Construction and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
Gray, J. (1831) The Social System: A Treatise on the Principle of Exchange. Edinburgh, UK: William Tait.
Green, M. (1990) The Robinson Crusoe Story. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Haken, J.C.L. (1805) Bibliothek der Robinsone, Vol. 1. Berlin: Johann Friedrich Unger.
Hewitson, G.J. (1999) Feminist Economics. Interrogating the Masculinity of Economic Man. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Hymer, S. (1971) Robinson Crusoe and the secret of primitive accumulation. Monthly Review 23 (4): 11–36.
Jennings, R. (1855) Natural Elements of Political Economy. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
Jevons, W.S. (1879) The Theory of Political Economy. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, G.S. (1977) Engels and the genesis of Marxism. New Left Review 106 (November–December): 79–104.
Joyce, J. (1964) Daniel Defoe. Buffalo Studies 1 (1): 3–25.
Kennedy, S. (2005) G.A. Cohen’s Karl Marx’s theory of history: A defence. Historical Materialism 13 (4): 331–344.
Kern, W.S. (2011) Robinson Crusoe and the economists. In: U. Grapard and G. Hewitson (eds.) Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man: A Construction and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
Kopf, E. (1977) Engels’ ‘Anti-Dühring’ und die bürgerliche Marxismuskritik im 19. Jahrhundert. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 25 (7): 813–831.
Lichtheim, G. (1964) Marxism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Loar, C.F. (2006) How to say things with guns: Military technology and the politics of ‘Robinson Crusoe’. Eighteenth Century Fiction 19 (1/2): 1–20.
Lukács, G. (1971 [1923]) History and Class Consciousness. Translated by R. Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marryat, F. (1841) Masterman Ready, or, The Wreck of the Pacific. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1975a) Marx Engels Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1975b) Collected Works of Marx and Engels. New York: International Publishers.
Merkel, R. (1985) Neues zur Entstehungsgeschichte des ‘Anti-Dühring’. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung 27 (6): 779–788.
Merkel, R. (1989) Zur Dühring-Rezeption in der deutschen Sozialdemokratie: Ergebnisse der MEGA-Forschung. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung 31 (4): 524–533.
Morfino, V. (2009) The syntax of violence: Between Hegel and Marx. Historical Materialism 17 (3): 81–100.
Moulfi, M. (2004) Engels: philosophie et sciences. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Neumann, S. and von Hagen, M. (1986) Engels and Marx on revolution, war, and the army in society. In: P. Paret (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy. From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Novak, M.E. (1963) Daniel Defoe and the Nature of Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pinker, S. (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.
Proudhon, P.J. (1994 [1840]) What is Property? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reckwitz, E. (1976) Die Robinsonade: Themen und Formen einer literarischen Gattung. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner.
Riazanov, D.B. (1927) Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Translated by J. Kunitz. New York: International Publishers.
Rogers, P. (ed.) (1972) Daniel Defoe: The Critical Heritage. New York: Routledge.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2010 [1762]) Emile or on Education. Translated by C. Kelly and A. Bloom. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press.
Semjonow, W.S. (1978) Die philosophische Begründung des wissenschaftlichen Kommunismus in Engels’ ‘Anti-Dühring’. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 26 (2): 177–190.
Spivak, G.C. (1999) A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stanley, J.L. and Zimmermann, E. (1984) On the alleged differences between Marx and Engels. Political Studies 32 (2): 226–248.
Thomas, P. (1976) Marx and science. Political Studies 24 (1): 1–23.
Ullrich, H. and Werchan, I. (1978) Die Entstehungs- und Wirkungsgeschichte des ‘Anti-Dühring’ (1876–1895). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung 20 (1): 19–33.
Verne, J. (1874) L’île mystérieuse. Paris: Hetzel.
Wallach, J.L. (1968) Die Kriegslehre von Friedrich Engels. Frankfurt a.M: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
Watt, I. (1951) Robinson Crusoe as a myth. Essays in Criticism 1 (2): 95–119.
Watt, I. (1996) Myths of Modern Individualism: Faust, Don Quixote, Don Juan, Robinson Crusoe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Welty, G. (1983) Marx, Engels, and ‘Anti-Dühring’. Political Studies 31 (2): 284–294.
White, M.V. (1987) Robinson Crusoe. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.) The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, M.V. (2011) Reading and rewriting: The production of an economic Robinson Crusoe. In: U. Grapard and G. Hewitson (eds.) Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man: A Construction and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
Wyss, J.R. (1812) Der schweizerische Robinson, oder der schiffbrüchige Schweizer-Prediger und seine Familie: Ein lehrreiches Buch für Kinder und Kinderfreunde zu Stadt und Land. Zurich: Orell Füssli.
Acknowledgements
For comments and suggestions on earlier drafts, I would like to thank Arash Abizadeh, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, Terrell Carver, Sam Chambers, Evan Fox-Decent, James Ingram, Hagar Kotef, Jacob Levy, Nancy Luxon, Robert Sparling, Joan Tronto, Antonio Vázquez-Arroyo and the anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winter, Y. Debating violence on the desert island: Engels, Dühring and Robinson Crusoe. Contemp Polit Theory 13, 318–338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.28
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.28