Article
Contemporary Political Theory (2008) 7, 238–258. doi:10.1057/cpt.2008.23
Power, Capability and Ableness: The Fallacy of the Vehicle Fallacy
Keith Dowdinga
aAustralian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. E-mail: keith.dowding@anu.edu.au
Revised 15 November 2007; Accepted 10 February 2008.
Abstract
Sen's capabilities are reducible to individual power. Morriss's important distinction between ability and ableness is pertinent to the correct analysis of measuring capabilities. Morriss argues reducing power to resources constitutes the vehicle fallacy. The vehicle fallacy is not a fallacy if resources are measured relationally, for example, the power of money is relative to its distribution. It follows that strategic considerations must enter into the very essence of the concept of power. While 'resources' in this essay are broader than Dworkin's account, the argument suggests that Sen's capabilities account of egalitarian justice is not so distinct from Dworkin's resource account after all.
Keywords:
power, capabilities, ability, ableness, resources, social justice
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Power, Capability and Ableness: The Fallacy of the Vehicle FallacyContemporary Political Theory Article
Textualising British politics: Deconstructing the subject of British foreign policyBritish Politics Original Article
?It Ain?t What You Say??: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and RhetoricBritish Politics Article
Overcoming the fear of commitment: Pre-electoral coalitions in Norway and SwedenActa Politica Original Article
The contract of fallibilityContemporary Political Theory Original Article
See all 6 matches for Research


