Skip to main content
Log in

The antinomies of aggressive atheism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

The spate of popular books attacking religion can be seen as a manifestation of the recoil against the idea of multiculturalism. Religious identities are also cultural identities, and no meaningful form of multiculturalism is possible that leaves religion outside the sphere of public recognition. This paper argues that ‘aggressive atheism’ undermines its appeal to reason by refusing to see anything of value in religion. It also risks exacerbating cultural differences at a time when reconciliation is needed. The critique focuses on the contribution of Richard Dawkins and examines a number of tensions within the aggressive atheism of his best-selling book The God Delusion. The second part of the paper introduces an alternative, a framework of reconciliatory dialogues, between atheism and religion and within religious communities, operating not just at a formal or institutional level but also in cultural expressions and in the practices of everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of the writers listed as ‘aggressive atheists’ Daniel Dennett may be regarded as the exception here as in the final chapter of Breaking the Spell he advocates the development of more tolerant dialogues and institutions to break down mutual incomprehension. However, in terming this goal a ‘utopian global conversation’ he acknowledges how far removed it is from anything that might be realized in the near future (Dennett, 2006, p. 329).

  2. This is the position adopted by Victor Stenger (2007), whose God The Failed Hypothesis is subtitled How Science Shows that God Does Not Exist.

  3. In an interesting discussion of Weber's typology of rationality, Immanuel Wallerstein points out that Weber draws two pairs of distinctions, between ‘instrumental’ and ‘value’ rationality in the sphere of social action, and between ‘formal’ and ‘substantive’ in the sphere of economic action. ‘Value rationality’ refers to action informed by ethical considerations which is undertaken irrespective of its prospects for success, and Weber is clearly sceptical of its prospects in the face of the seductive power of instrumental rationality. However, he is far more receptive to the possibility of achieving substantive rationality, and this opens up the possibility of subordinating the pursuit of short-term individual gain to long-term social goals (Wallerstein, 1999, pp. 141–144).

  4. E.L. Doctorow's novel City of God is a good example, for it deals with relationships between theist and atheist, Christian and Jew, and between different Jewish affiliations – for a discussion see Wilde, 2006, pp. 391–405.

  5. There is also a concern that the Parliament is becoming heavily influenced by representatives of the New Age Movement.

References

  • Aikenhead, S. (2008) ‘People Say I’m Strident’, interview with Richard Dawkins. The Guardian, 25 October, p. 31.

  • An-Na’im, A.A. (1999) Political Islam in National Politics and International Relations. In: P. Berger (ed.) The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman's Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2003) Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, R. (2006) The Kingdom Come: An Evangelical's Lament. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1972) Atheism in Christianity. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blond, P. (ed.) (1998) Post-Secular Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. (1995) Religion of Reason: Out of the Sources of Judaism. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press [1919].

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C., Milbank, J. and Zizek, S. (eds.) (2005) Theology and the Political: The New Debate. Durham, USA; London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1998) Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2006a) The Root of All Evil. Channel 4.

  • Dawkins, R. (2006b) The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, R. (2004) God: An Itinerary. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. (2006) Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1998) ‘Faith and Hope’ in Religion. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, H. (1999) Philosophy and the Turn to Religion. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1982) Ideas and Opinions. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1984) The Einstein Reader. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (2001) Religion and Humane Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1991) You Shall be as Gods: A Radical Interpretation of the Old Testament and its Tradition. New York: Henry Holt [1966].

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1993) The Dogma of Christ. New York: Henry Holt [1963].

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (2003) Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. London: Routledge [1947].

    Google Scholar 

  • Glebe-Möller, J. (1987) Political Dogmatic. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (2001) More Things in Heaven and Earth. In: H. Rose and S. Rose (eds.) Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. London: Vintage, pp. 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayling, A.C. (2007) Against All Gods. London: Oberon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2002) Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. and Ratzinger, J. (2006) The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2005) The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. (1998) Jacques Derrida: The God Effect. In: P. Blond (ed.) Post-Secular Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (2000) Physics and Philosophy. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2007) God is Not Great: The Case Against Religion. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (2004) History: A New Age of Reason. In: Le Monde Diplomatique, December.

  • Jammer, M. (1999) Einstein and Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, W. (2003) Rediscovering the Theological in Sociology: foundations and possibilities. Theory, Culture and Society 20 (1): 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. (1997) A Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics. London: SCM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. (2005) Elusive Togetherness: Church Groups Trying to Bridge America's Divisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1994) Early Political Writings, Joseph O’Malley (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, A. (2005) Dawkins’ God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, A. and McGrath, J.C. (2007) The Dawkins Delusion: Atheistic Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (2001) Why Memes? In: H. Rose and S. Rose (eds.) Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. London: Vintage, pp. 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2007) Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr, S.H. (2002) The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity. San Francisco, CA: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onfray, M. (2007) In Defence of Atheism: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism and Islam. London: Serpent's Tail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2000) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, S.H. (2005) Religious Transnationalism. In: H. Juergensmeyer (ed.) Religion in Global Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, D.R. (ed.) (2002) Interfaith Dialogue and Peacebuilding. Herndon, VA: USIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (2004) A Theologico-Political Treatise and a Political Treatise. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, V.J. (2007) God, the Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows that God Does Not Exist. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, B. (2005) Islam Between Culture and Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1999) The End of the World as We Know it: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis, USA; London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society, Vol. 1. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, L. (2006) The Search for Reconciliation in E.L. Doctorow's City of God, Religion and the Arts 10: 391–405, Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilde, L. The antinomies of aggressive atheism. Contemp Polit Theory 9, 266–283 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2008.64

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2008.64

Keywords

Navigation