Abstract
Legitimacy and reputation are both perceptions of approval of an organization's actions. Legitimacy is a perception that organizations conform with taken-for-granted standards. Reputation is a perception that organizations are positively distinctive within their peer group. While the need for inclusion and distinction may seem somewhat contradictory on its face, we maintain that both functional demands are grounded in an organization's adopted social identities, or social identity referents, characterized herein as social category memberships. Social identities constitute an organization's reference group and provide stakeholders with standards by which assessments of the organization are made. Organizations are seen as having legitimacy when they comply with the minimum standards of a particular social identity prototype – a prototypical X-type organization. Organizations have good reputations when they are viewed favorably relative to the ideal standard for a particular social identity – an ideal, or esteemed, X-type organization. Conventional thinking holds that legitimacy is a requirement of all organizations, whereas reputation is a desirable, but not essential property. This paper argues that, from the perspective of identity theory, reputation and legitimacy are complementary, reciprocal concepts, linked to the dual identification requirements: who is this actor similar to and how is this actor different from all similar others. The implications of this ‘fresh perspective’ for organizational reputation scholarship are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Both Zuckerman (1999) and Hannan et al. (2007) use the term social identity. In Zuckerman's case, social identities constrain a firm's identity by defining its legitimacy requirements and specifying its audience, and for Hannan et al., identity, more generally, refers to a ‘virtual social identity’ that sets expectations that audiences have of an organization (2007: 101–102). We subscribe to the same use of the term ‘social identity’ as offered by these scholars.
Institutional scholars may note a similarity between our notion of minimum standards and institutional logics (eg Friedland and Alford, 1991; Clemens and Cook, 1999). From institutional logics, organizations learn recipes for attaining legitimacy. We simplify this somewhat by arguing that minimum standards simply designate the most basic recipe for legitimacy – what we refer to as a member prototype.
References
Abrams, D. and Hogg, M.A. (1988) ‘Comments on the motivations status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317–334.
Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A. (1985) ‘Organizational identity’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
Aldrich, H.E. (1999) Organizations Evolving, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989) ‘Social identity theory and the organization’, Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.
Baumeister, R.F. (1998) ‘The self’, in D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp. 680–740.
Becker, H.S. (1984) Art Worlds, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Brewer, M.B. (1991) ‘The social self: On being the same and different at the same time’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (5), 475–482.
Brewer, M.B. and Gardner, W. (1996) ‘Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (1), 83–93.
Brown, T.J., Dacin, P.A., Pratt, M.G. and Whetten, D.A. (2006) ‘Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 99–106.
Clemens, E.S. and Cook, J.M. (1999) ‘Politics and institutionalism’, Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466.
Coleman, J.S. (1982) The Asymmetric Society, 1st edn., Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.
Czarniawska, B. (1997) Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R.V. and Roper, S. (2001) ‘The personification metaphor as a measurement approach for corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (2), 113–127.
Deephouse, D.L. (1999) ‘To be different or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance’, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 147–166.
Deephouse, D.L. (2000) ‘Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories’, Journal of Management, 26 (6), 1091–1112.
Deephouse, D.L. and Carter, S.M. (2005) ‘An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation’, Journal of Management Studies, 42 (2), 329–360.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160.
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.
Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M. and Harquail, C.V. (1994) ‘Organizational images and member identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (2), 239–263.
Elsbach, K.D. (2006) Organizational Perception Management, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Elsbach, K.D. and Kramer, R.M. (1996) ‘Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (3), 442–476.
Espeland, W.N. and Stevens, M.L. (1998) ‘Commensuration as a social process’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.
Fombrun, C.J. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Fombrun, C.J. and Van Riel, C.B.M. (2004) Fame and Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Friedland, R. and Alford, R.A. (1991) ‘Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions’, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 232–263.
Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M. and Corley, K.G. (2000) ‘Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability’, Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 63–81.
Glynn, M.A. (2000) ‘When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over identity within a symphony orchestra’, Organization Science, 11 (3), 285–298.
Golden-Biddle, K. and Rao, H. (1997) ‘Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization’, Organization Science, 8 (6), 593–611.
Greenfeld, L. (1989) Different Worlds: A Sociological Study of Taste, Choice, and Success in Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hannan, T.H. and McDowell, J.M. (1987) ‘Rival precedence and the dynamics of technology adoption: An empirical analysis’, Economica, 54 (214), 155–171.
Hannan, M.T., Pólos, L. and Carroll, G.R. (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Haveman, H.A. and Rao, H. (1997) ‘Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry’, American Journal of Sociology, 102 (6), 1606–1651.
Hogg, M.A. and Terry, D.J. (2000) ‘Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts’, Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121–140.
Hsu, G. (2006) ‘Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the U.S. film industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 15 (3), 467–496.
Hsu, G. and Hannan, M.T. (2005) ‘Identities, genres, and organizational forms’, Organization Science, 16 (5), 474–490.
Hsu, G. and Podolny, J.M. (2005) ‘Critiquing the critics: An approach for the comparative evaluation of critical schemas’, Social Science Research, 34, 189–214.
Illia, L. and Lurati, F. (2006) ‘Stakeholder perspectives on organizational identity: Searching for a relationship approach’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (4), 293–304.
Lawrence, T.B. (1998) ‘Examining resources in an occupational community: Reputation in Canadian forensic accounting’, Human Relations, 51, 1103–1131.
Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A. (2001) ‘Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.
Lounsbury, M. and Ventresca, M.J. (eds.) (2002) Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, Elsevier, Oxford.
Mischel, W. and Morf, C.C. (2003) ‘The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology’, in M.R. Leary and J.P. Tangney (eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity, Guilford, New York, pp. 15–44.
Morgeson, F.P. and Hofmann, D.A. (1999) ‘The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development’, Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 249–265.
Oliver, C. (1991) ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes’, Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145–179.
Oliver, C. (1997) ‘Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), 697–713.
Perrow, C. (1979) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 2nd edn., Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL.
Porac, J.F., Ventresca, M.J. and Mishina, Y. (2002) ‘Interorganizational cognition and interpretation’, in J.A.C. Baum (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 599–620.
Pratt, M.G. and Foreman, P.O. (2000) ‘Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities’, Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 18–42.
Pruzan, P. (2001) ‘Corporate reputation: Image and identity’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (1), 50–64.
Rao, H. (1994) ‘The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912’, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29–44.
Rao, H., Monin, P. and Durand, R. (2003) ‘Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy’, American Journal of Sociology, 108 (4), 795–843.
Rindova, V.P. and Fombrun, C.J. (1999) ‘Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions’, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 691–710.
Rindova, V.P. and Petkova, A.P. (2007) ‘When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations’, Organization Science, 18 (2), 217–232.
Rindova, V.P., Petkova, A.P. and Kotha, S. (2007) ‘Standing out: How new firms in emerging markets build reputation’, Strategic Organization, 5 (1), 31–70.
Rindova, V.P., Pollock, T.G. and Hayward, M.L.A. (2006) ‘Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity’, Academy of Management Review, 31 (1), 50–71.
Rindova, V.P., Williamson, I.O., Petkova, A.P. and Sever, J.M. (2005) ‘Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation’, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (6), 1033–1049.
Ruef, M. and Scott, W.R. (1998) ‘A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing organizational environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877–904.
Scott, S.G. and Lane, V.R. (2000) ‘A stakeholder approach to organizational identity’, Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 43–62.
Scott, W.R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration, Harper & Row, New York.
Suchman, M.C. (1995) ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610.
van Rekom, J. and Whetten, D.A. (2007) ‘How organizational identity beliefs cohere: About essence, distinctiveness and continuity’, Academy of Management conference, August, Philadelphia.
Whetten, D.A. (2002) ‘Modeling-as-theorizing: A systematic methodology for theory development’, in D. Partington (ed.), Essential Skills for Management Research, Sage, London, pp. 45–71.
Whetten, D.A. (2006) ‘Albert and Whetten revisited strengthening the concept of organizational identity’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15 (3), 219–234.
Whetten, D.A. and Mackey, A. (2002) ‘A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation’, Business and Society, 41 (4), 393–414.
White, H.C. and White, C.A. (1992) Canvasses and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Zuckerman, E.W. (1999) ‘The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount’, The American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5), 1398–1438.
Zuckerman, E.W. (2004) ‘Structural incoherence and stock market activity’, American Sociological Review, 69 (3), 405–432.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge valuable feedback from Teppo Felin, David Deephouse, Greta Hsu and the Organizational Research Group at BYU on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, B., Whetten, D. Rethinking the Relationship Between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization. Corp Reputation Rev 11, 192–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.16
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.16