Abstract
Corporate reputation is a multifaceted concept that encompasses several components. Each component has prominent effects on different stakeholders. This study shows how different components of corporate reputation influences potential employees’ intentions. We manipulated different aspects of a hypothetical firm's reputation in a between-subjects experimental design with seven treatments. In each treatment, one aspect of corporate reputation was negatively manipulated. Results of hierarchical regression analysis provide strong support for our central research thesis; among the six corporate reputation dimensions, workplace conditions is found to exert the strongest effect on potential employees’ intentions to seek employment with a company. Managerial and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A. (1985) ‘Organizational identity’, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 263–295.
Ambler, T. and Barrow, S. (1996) ‘The employer brand’, Journal of Brand Management, 4 (3), 185–206.
Andreassen, T.W. and Lindestad, B. (1998) ‘The effect of corporate image in the formation of customer loyalty’, Journal of Service Research, 1 (1), 82–92.
Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989) ‘Social identity theory and the organization’, Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.
Backhaus, K. and Tikoo, S. (2004) ‘Conceptualizing and researching employer branding’, Career Development International, 9 (5), 501–517.
Barich, H. and Kotler, P. (1991) ‘A framework for marketing image management’, Sloan Management Review, 32 (2), 94–109.
Berens, G. and van Riel, C.B.M. (2004) ‘Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought in the reputation measurement literature’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (2), 161–178.
Brammer, S., Millington, A. and Rayton, B. (2007) ‘The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (10), 1701–1719.
Bromley, D. (2001) ‘Relationships between personal and corporate reputation’, European Journal of Marketing, 35 (3), 316–334.
Carmeli, A. and Freund, A. (2002) ‘The relationship between work and workplace attitudes and perceived external prestige’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5 (1), 51–68.
Carmeli, A. and Tishler, A. (2005) ‘Perceived organizational reputation and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of industrial enterprises’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (1), 13–30.
Carmeli, A., Gilat, G. and Weisberg, J. (2006) ‘Perceived external prestige organizational identification and affective commitment: A stakeholder approach’, Corporate Reputation Review, 9 (2), 92–104.
Caruana, A. (1997) ‘Corporate reputation: Concept and measurement’, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6 (2), 109–118.
Caruana, A. and Chircop, S. (2000) ‘Measuring corporate reputation: A case example’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3 (1), 43–57.
Chun, R. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7 (2), 91–109.
Collins, C.J. and Stevens, C.K. (2002) ‘The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labour market entrants: A brand equity approach to recruitment’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (6), 1121–1133.
Cravens, K.S. and Oliver, E.G. (2006) ‘Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management’, Business Horizons, 49 (4), 293–302.
Davies, G. (2008) ‘Employer branding and its influence on managers’, European Journal of Marketing, 42 (5/6), 667–681.
Davies, G., Chun, R. and Da Silva, R. (2001) ‘The personification metaphor as a measurement approach for corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (2), 113–127.
Dollinger, M.J., Golden, PA. and Saxton, T. (1997) ‘The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (2), 127–140.
Dowling, G.R. (1986) ‘Managing your corporate image’, Industrial Marketing Management, 15 (2), 109–115.
Dutton, J.E. and Dukerich, J.M. (1991) ‘Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation’, Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 517–554.
Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M. and Harquail, C.V. (1994) ‘Organization images and member identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (2), 239–263.
Eberl, M. and Schwaiger, M. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation: Disentangling the effects on financial performance’, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7–8), 838–854.
Field, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edn., Sage Publications, London.
Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990) ‘What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2), 233–258.
Fombrun, C.J. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Fombrun, C.J. and van Riel, C.B. (1997) ‘The reputational landscape’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (2), 5–13.
Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A. and Sever, J.W. (2000) ‘The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation’, The Journal of Brand Management, 7 (4), 241–255.
Fryxell, G.E. and Wang, J. (1994) ‘The fortune corporate ‘reputation’ index: Reputation for what?’ Journal of Management, 20 (1), 1–14.
Gatewood, R.D., Gowan, M.A. and Lautenschlager, G.J. (1993) ‘Corporate image recruitment image and initial job choice decisions’, Academy of Management Journal, 36 (2), 414–427.
Goldberg, M.E. and Hartwick, J. (1990) ‘The effect of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness’, Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 172–179.
Gotsi, M. and Wilson, A.M. (2001) ‘Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition’, Corporate Communications, 6 (1), 24–30.
Groenland, E.A.G. (2002) ‘Qualitative research to validate the RQ-dimensions’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (4), 309–315.
Hall, R. (1993) ‘A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (8), 607–618.
Helm, S. (2005) ‘Designing a formative measure for corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (2), 95–109.
Herbig, P. and Milewicz, J. (1993) ‘The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10 (1), 5–10.
Herrbach, O., Mignonac, K. and Gatignon, A. (2004) ‘Exploring the role of perceived external prestige in managers’ turnover intentions’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15 (8), 1390–1407.
Keller, K.L. and Aaker, D.A. (1998) ‘Corporate level marketing: The impact of credibility marketing on brand extensions’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (4), 356–378.
Lado, A.A. and Wilson, M.C. (1994) ‘Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantages: A competency-based perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), 699–727.
Lievens, F. and Highhouse, S. (2003) ‘The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer’, Personnel Psychology, 56 (1), 75–101.
Ou, W.M., Abratt, R. and Dion, P. (2006) ‘The influence of retailer reputation on store patronage’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13 (3), 221–230.
Page, G. and Fearn, H. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation: What do consumers really care about?’ Journal of Advertising Research, 45 (3), 305–313.
Pfeffer, J. (1994) ‘Competitive advantage through people’, California Management Review, 36 (2), 9–28.
Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D. and Bill, J.B. (1997) ‘Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 16 (4), 401–412.
Roberts, P.W. and Dowling, G.R. (2002) ‘Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), 1077–1093.
Robertson, T.S. (1993) ‘How to reduce market penetration cycle times’, Sloan Management Review, 35 (1), 87–96.
Rose, C. and Thomsen, S. (2004) ‘The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some Danish evidence’, European Management Journal, 22 (2), 201–210.
Sabate, JM. and Puente, E. (2003) ‘Empirical analysis of the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance: A survey of the literature’, Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (2), 161–177.
Saxton, M.K. (1998) ‘Where do corporate reputations come from?’ Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (4), 393–399.
Schwaiger, M. (2004) ‘Components and parameters of corporate reputation – An empirical study’, Schmalenbach Business Review, 56 (1), 46–71.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Korschun, D. (2006) ‘The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 158–166.
Shapiro, C. (1982) ‘Consumer information product quality and seller reputation’, The Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (1), 20–35.
Shapiro, C. (1983) ‘Premiums for high-quality products as returns to reputations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (4), 659–681.
Slaughter, J.E., Zickar, M.J., Highhouse, S. and Mohr, D.C. (2004) ‘Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (1), 85–102.
Spence, A.M. (1974) Market Signaling: Information Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Turban, D.B. and Cable, D.M. (2003) ‘Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (6), 733–751.
Turban, D.B. and Greening, D.W. (1996) ‘Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees’, Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 658–672.
Vergin, R.C. and Qoronfleh, M.W. (1998) ‘Corporate reputation and the stock market’, Business Horizons, 41 (1), 19–26.
Walsh, G. and Beatty, SE. (2007) ‘Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (1), 127–143.
Walsh, G. and Wiedmann, K.P. (2004) ‘A conceptualization of corporate reputation in Germany: An evaluation and extension of the RQ’, Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (4), 304–312.
Wartick, S.L. (2002) ‘Measuring corporate reputation, definition and data’, Business and Society, 41 (4), 371–392.
Williams, R.J., Schnake, M.E. and Fredenberger, W. (2005) ‘The impact of corporate strategy on a firm's reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (3), 187–197.
Yoon, E., Guffey, H.J. and Kijewski, V. (1993) ‘The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service’, Journal of Business Research, 27 (3), 215–228.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of this paper. We are also grateful to Prof. Dr Nurullah Genc for his contribution to the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
APPENDIX A
Scale Items of the Measures
Part A. Intentions to seek employment with the company
-
1)
I would love to work for Company XYZ.
-
2)
I would accept a lower salary to work for Company XYZ.
-
3)
I would be proud to work for Company XYZ.
-
4)
I would not seek employment with a company rather than Company XYZ.
Part B. Assessment of company reputation
According to the information provided in the text, how would you evaluate the following features of Company XYZ? Please rate each feature by giving a rank between 0 (extremely poor) and 10 (perfect).
-
1)
Feelings evoked in your mind about the company.
-
2)
Its way of treatment to its employees.
-
3)
Its financial performance.
-
4)
Its social and environmental performance.
-
5)
Quality of its products.
-
6)
Success of its management.
-
7)
Its overall reputation.
APPENDIX B
Illustrative Vignettes
‘Company XYZ’ (All positive control version)
Company XYZ is functioning in the consumer electronics industry. It has gained a favorable position in the eye of the general public. First of all, it is respected for the high quality of its products. Customers believe that the firm's reputation for value is among the best in the industry. That is because the company is committed to customer orientation and it highly respects consumer rights. Consequently, the company holds the leading position in the market. The company is also known for its financial soundness. It has consistently provided investors with excellent returns and has proved to be a very valuable long-term investment. This is probably because of the high quality of its top managers. The executives of the firm display an efficient vision and leadership. They closely monitor the rapidly changing market and take the necessary steps immediately. They constantly try to find new, promising investment fields to ensure a sustainable growth. The company also offers attractive work place conditions for its employees. It is committed to promoting and developing the capabilities of the employees. It provides a wide range of personal and professional development opportunities. The company's pay system also rewards the employees by giving them what they deserve. Thus, employee satisfaction is higher than the industry average, and labor turnover is very low. Moreover, Company XYZ is respected for its support to social causes. Its support to social responsibility projects is never underestimatable. It is highly involved in the community and philanthropic issues, and supports social causes such as fight against poverty, discrimination, and violation of human rights, developing the Third World, and so on. It exclusively collaborates with pro-environmental organizations to develop a sustainable business environment. The company constantly improves its technology to decrease energy and resource consumption and waste production throughout the manufacturing processes.
Negative Information about Social & Environmental Responsibility of Company XYZ
(The following paragraph is replaced with the italicized text above, to negatively manipulate the dimension of social & environmental responsibility. A similar procedure is followed to negatively manipulate the other reputation dimensions, in each treatment.)
But for all that, the company is criticized for not being responsible to the natural environment and to the needs of the community. It always refuses the calls coming from philanthropic associations for supporting social causes. The company is accused of being selfish and behaving mean to sponsoring societal projects. Even worse, its manufacturing technology is quite old and put an undue stress on the environment by consuming excessive resources or producing excessive waste or pollution. In the past, Company XYZ has paid significant fines and penalties for environmental pollution.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alniacik, E., Alniacik, U. & Erdogmus, N. How Do the Dimensions of Corporate Reputation Affect Employment Intentions?. Corp Reputation Rev 15, 3–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2011.25
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2011.25