Skip to main content
Log in

Climate Change, Mother Earth and the Commons: Reflections on El Cumbre

  • Thematic Section
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

illustration

Massimo De Angelis is Professor of Political Economy at the University of East London. He is the author of several research publications on value theory, globalization, social movements and the political reading of economic narrative. His most recent book, The Beginning of History: Value Struggle and Global Capital, came out in 2007 with Pluto press. He has a blog at the The Commoner site. This is a web journal that he edits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a general popular discussion on commons, see, for example, the website www.onthecommons.org. A sense of the wide extension of the range of applications of commons and commons analysis in development can be acquired by browsing the papers in the digital archive of commons, the website set up by the International Association for the Study of Commons (http://www.iasc-commons.org/). The work of Elinor Ostrom is extensive, but her classic book (Ostrom, 1990) is worth singling out. See Caffentzis (2004) for a radical critical engagement with this approach. De Angelis (2007) offers a general discussion of the problematic of commons and enclosures in relation to capitalist development. Federici (2004) discusses the relation between commons and women power in the community in the history of capitalism, whereas Federici (2010) problematizes the politics of commons from a feminist perspective. For an example of how commons are constructed in security discourses, see Denmark and Mulvenon (2010).

  2. In my interviews with community activists as well as with government officials, I was told that the two carry similar meanings. This can be disputed, see Lambert (2011: 3).

  3. There is of course just the opposite view. Reportedly, the Feministas Comunitaris de Bolivia ‘denounced that the understanding of Pachamama as synonym of Mother Earth is “reductionist and machista, and that makes reference only to fertility in order to keep women and Pachamama under patriarchal domination”’. The argument claims this on the basis that instead Pachamama is a ‘whole that goes much beyond the visible nature … and that includes life, the relations established within living beings, its energies, necessities and desires’. But this holistic and relational meaning is precisely the one that I gathered was given to the notion of Mother Earth in pretty much all interventions I heard and references to it, and not, as it is alleged, ‘as something that can be dominated and manipulated at the service of “development” and of consumption’. If it was the latter, the entire discursive construction, processes of the conference and the final document would not make any sense!

  4. The emphasis on relational fields implies discussion on the meaning of ‘community’. Mignolo (2009) critically counterpoises the Western-centred discourse on commons to a decolonial perspective centred, instead, on community.

  5. For a review of the debate of Buen Vivir in the context of political movements around the Andes, see Acosta and Martínez (2009).

  6. The verb ‘commoning’ was introduced by the historian Peter Linebough (2008) and is now generally understood as a generative praxis of commons. For an explicative note, see De Angelis (2009).

  7. See www.conamaq.org.bo for a critique of extractivism in progressive governments in Latin America (Gudynas, 2009).

References

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Proposes how to change the eco-social relations determining our livelihoods in the face of climate change

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Angelis, M. Climate Change, Mother Earth and the Commons: Reflections on El Cumbre. Development 54, 183–189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.26

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.26

Keywords

Navigation