Skip to main content
Log in

The Power of Numbers: A critical review of MDG targets for human development and human rights

  • Thematic Section
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Fukuda-Parr and Yamin explore the effects of global goal setting on international development agendas and thinking. They present a condensed synthesis of the “Power of Numbers” project, an independent research initiative, led by them, and involving 17 scholars. The project analyzed the influence of MDGs and associated indicators on policy priorities and development narratives, their diverse incentives, and both intended and unintended consequences. The authors recommend that both positive and negative lessons from experience be kept in mind in the design of the post-2015 agendas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Income poverty declined rapidly and the target has already been met as a global aggregate. However, this ‘progress’ must be seen in the light of the fact that much of the gains are accounted for by China. World Total without China would not be on track to achieving the 2015 target.

  2. Initially the only target until the second target of universal access to reproductive health services was added in 2005, and the respective indicators were added in 2007.

References

  • Caliari, Aldo (2013) ‘Analysis of Millennium Development Goal 8: A global partnership for development’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Boston, May.

  • Cohen, Michael (2013) ‘The City is Missing in the Millennium Development Goals: Where is the city?’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, June.

  • Davis, Kevin, Benedict Kinsbury, Sally Engle Merry and Angelina Fisher (2012) Governance by Indicators: Global governance through quantification and ranking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S. (2013) ‘Global Goal Setting as a Policy Tool for Global Governance: Intended and unintended consequences’, ICP Working Paper No. 108, Boston, April.

  • Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and Amy Orr (2013) ‘The MDG Hunger Target and the Contested Visions of Food Security’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, May.

  • Gentilini, Ugo and Andy Sumner (2013) ‘Setting an Income Poverty Goal after 2015’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, May.

  • Gibbons, Elizabeth and Elisa Diaz-Martinez (2013) ‘The Questionable Power of the Millennium Development Goal to Reduce Child Mortality’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, May.

  • Jolly, R. (2004) ‘Global Goals: The UN experience’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 5 (1): 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, Richard, Louis Emmerij and Thomas G. Weiss (2009) UN Ideas that Changed the World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, Malcolm and Inga Winkler (2013) ‘Quantifying Water and Sanitation in Development Cooperation: Power or perversity’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, May.

  • Merry, Sally Engle (2009) ‘Measuring the World: Indicators, human rights and global governance’. Current Anthropology 52 (S3): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nattrass, Nicoli (2013) ‘MDG6: AIDS and the International Health Agenda’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

  • Porter, Theodore M. (1994) ‘Making Things Quantitative’. Science in Context 7 (3): 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Gita and Avanti Mukherjee (2013) ‘No Empowerment without Rights, No Rights without Politics: Gender Equality, the MDGs and the Post 2015 Development Agenda’, Working Paper series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, May.

  • Unterhalter, Elaine (2013) ‘Education Targets, Indicators and A Post-2015 Development Agenda: Education for all, the MDGs and human development’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, April.

  • Van der Hoeven, Rolph (2013) ‘The Inclusion of Full Employment in MDG1, What Lessons for a Post-2015 Development Agenda?’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, May.

  • Yamin, Alicia Ely and Vanessa Boulanger (2013) ‘Taking Measure of the Elephant in the Room: Sexual and reproductive health and rights, MDG5, and where we want to go from here’, Working Paper Series, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, May.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Argues that while quantitative targets (e.g., the MDGs) are powerful as communication tools and benchmarks, they are not a substitute for policymaking or prioritizing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukuda-Parr, S., Yamin, A. The Power of Numbers: A critical review of MDG targets for human development and human rights. Development 56, 58–65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.8

Keywords

Navigation