Abstract
This article illuminates the relationship between John Rawls' and Michael Walzer's accounts of non-domestic justice by tracing its connection to their domestic relationship. More precisely, it (a) places the celebrated positional shifts that characterize the latter (i.e., as is generally accepted, Rawls took a hermeneutic ‘turn’, and Walzer a universalist one) within the context of the fundamental justificatory tension between their projects which endures: reason vs trust; and then (b) juxtaposes this justificatory tension and their non-domestic political prescriptions. Such contextualization is important to the clarification of the pair's non-domestic relationship since it enables the observation that despite this enduring justificatory tension these political prescriptions are remarkably similar.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For their helpful and thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this article, I thank Shane O'Neill, Keith Breen, Susan McManus, and the two anonymous reviewers of this journal.
I say ‘some’ since cosmopolitans can, of course, differ on their views of state borders (see O O'Neill, 1996).
On the potential problems of this assumption, see Shane O'Neill's discussion of Northern Ireland (S O'Neill, 1997, chapter 8).
References
Beitz, C. (1991) ‘Sovereignty and Morality in International Affairs’, in D. Held (ed.) Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beitz, C. (1999) Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beitz, C. (2005) ‘Cosmopolitanism and global justice’, The Journal of Ethics 9 (1–2): 11–27.
Benhabib, S. (2001) ‘Of Guests, Aliens, and Citizens: Rereading Kant's Cosmopolitan Right’, in W. Rehg and J. Bohman (eds.) Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brown, C. (2002) Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Caney, S. (2001) ‘Review article: international distributive justice’, Political Studies 49: 974–997.
Caney, S. (2005) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carens, J. (2000) Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carens, J. (2004) ‘A contextual approach to political theory’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7: 117–132.
Doppelt, G. (1978) ‘Walzer's theory of morality in international relations’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (1): 3–26.
Doppelt, G. (1980) ‘Statism without foundations’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (4): 398–403.
Held, D. (2002) ‘Law of states, law of peoples: three models of sovereignty’, Legal Theory 8: 1–44.
Kelly, E. (2001) ‘Justice and communitarian identity politics’, The Journal of Value Inquiry 35: 71–93.
Kuper, A. (2000) ‘Rawlsian global justice: beyond The Law of Peoples to a cosmopolitan law of peoples’, Political Theory 28 (5): 640–674.
Li, X. (2001) ‘Tolerating the intolerable: the case of female genital mutilation’, Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 21 (1): 2–8.
Moellendorf, D. (2002) Cosmopolitan Justice, Boulder: Westview Press.
Moellendorf, D. (2003) ‘Constructing the Law of Peoples’, in C. Kukathas (ed.) John Rawls: Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers, Vol. IV, London: Routledge.
Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. (1996) Liberals and Communitarians, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
O'Neill, O. (1996) ‘Transnational Justice: Permeable Boundaries and Multiple Identities’, in P. King (ed.) Socialism and the Common Good: New Fabian Essays, London: Frank Cass.
O'Neill, O. (2000) ‘Bounded and Cosmopolitan Justice’, Review of International Studies 26: 45–66.
O'Neill, S. (1997) Impartiality in Context: Grounding Justice in a Pluralist World, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Orend, B. (2000) ‘Considering globalism, proposing pluralism: Michael Walzer on international justice’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29 (2): 411–425.
Pogge, T. (1990) Realizing Rawls, Ithica: Cornell University Press.
Pogge, T. (1994a) ‘An egalitarian law of peoples’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (3): 195–224.
Pogge, T. (1994b) ‘Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty’, in C. Brown (ed.) Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives, London: Routledge.
Pogge, T. (2001) ‘Critical study: Rawls on international justice’, The Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203): 246–253.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1985) ‘Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3/Summer): 223–251.
Rawls, J. (1993a) Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993b) ‘The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus’, in D. Copp et al. (eds.) The Idea of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993c) ‘The Law of Peoples’, in S. Shute and S. Hurley (eds.) On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, New York: Basic Books.
Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001) ‘Fundamental Ideas' and ‘Principles of Justice’’, in E. Kelly (ed.) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rorty, R. (1998) ‘Justice as a Larger Loyalty’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds.) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Taylor, C. (1999) ‘Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights’, in J. Bauer and D. Bell (eds.) The East Asian Challenge For Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer, M. (1980) ‘The moral standing of states: a response to four critics’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (3): 209–229.
Walzer, M. (1981) ‘Philosophy and democracy’, Political Theory 9 (3/Aug): 379–399.
Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, Oxford: Blackwell.
Walzer, M. (1986) ‘The Reform of the International System’, in Ø. Østerud (ed.) Studies in War and Peace, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Walzer, M. (1993) Interpretation and Social Criticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walzer, M. (1994a) ‘Notes on the New Tribalism’, in C. Brown (ed.) Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives, London: Routledge.
Walzer, M. (1994b) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Walzer, M. (1995) ‘Response’, in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds.) Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walzer, M. (1999a) ‘Deliberation, and What Else?’, in S. Macedo (ed.) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walzer, M. (1999b) ‘Seminar with Michael Walzer’, Ethical Perspectives 6 (3–4): 220–242.
Warnke, G. (1990) ‘Rawls, Habermas, and Real Talk: A Reply to Walzer’, in M. Kelly (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Warnke, G. (1999) Legitimate Differences: Interpretation in the Abortion Controversy and Other Public Debates, Berkley: University of California Press.
Wenar, L. (2002) ‘The Legitimacy of Peoples’, in P. De Greiff and C. Cronin (eds.) Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalisation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Young, I.M. (1995) ‘Survey article: Rawls's Political Liberalism’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 3 (2): 181–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, C. Rawls and Walzer on Non-Domestic Justice. Contemp Polit Theory 6, 419–436 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300303
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300303