Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New frontiers for information systems research: computer art as an information system

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

This paper proposes extending the frontiers of information systems (IS) research by seeing computer art as a kind of information system. It explores some research questions that arise if we take such a view. A new agenda for IS research is developed, based upon six themes in computer art and related work in previous IS research. The link between IS and computer art is bi-directional: our theories of information systems could inform the study of computer art, and computer art could inform our information systems theories, possibly leading to modification or even abandonment of them. Twelve research questions are suggested, and potential barriers to IS researchers studying computer art are also discussed. The paper offers possibilities, not solutions, and makes an important contribution by suggesting new opportunities for innovative research in IS and by signposting some of the topics which could be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avison D (1997) The ‘discipline’ of information systems: Teaching, research and practice. In Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? (MINGERS J and STOWELL FA, Eds), pp 113–135, McGraw-Hill, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville RL and Myers MD (2002) Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Quarterly 26 (1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I and Weber R (1996) Research commentary: Rethinking diversity in information systems research. Information Systems Research (7:4), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I and Zmud RW (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly (27:2).

  • Bertelsen OV and Pold S (2004) Criticism as an approach to interface aesthetics. In NordiCHI ‘04, October 23–27, pp 23–32, Tampere, Finland, ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes G, Ehn P and Kyng M (1987) Computers and Democracy. Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy L and Edmonds E (2002) Explorations in Art and Technology. Springer, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester, Sussex, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Holwell S (1998) Information, Systems, and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Wiley, Chichester, Sussex, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes J (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester, Sussex, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly (13:3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring N (2002) Personal home pages on the Web: A review of research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7 (3) (available on-line at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue3/doering.html).

  • Ehn P and Kyng M (1987) The collective resource approach to systems design. In Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge (BJERKNES G, EHN P and KYNG M, Eds), pp 17–57, Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller J and Fitzgerald B (2001) Understanding Open Source Software Development. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan JC and Griffin JA (2000) Incorporating visual design into information systems courses: A practical primer reshaping the human, computer interface design curriculum. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges (16:1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H (1993) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene R (2004) Internet Art. Thames & Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson K (1999) On-Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Bonus S and Wright E (2005) Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information, Technology & People 18 (22), 142–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine C (2001) Web pages, authors and audiences. The meaning of a mouse click. Information, Communication & Society (4:2), 182–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen PGW (1980) MIS research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems (MCLEAN E, Ed.), pp 9–18, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher T and Miller BM (2006) Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2) (available on-line at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/kelleher.html).

  • Lansdown J (2002) Some Trends in Computer Graphic Art. In Computers and Art (STUART M, Ed), pp 51–58, Intellect, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring K (2001) But is it art? The creators of these digital works say that behind the gee-whizz gadgetry is a new interactive art form. Chicago Tribune February 25, 2001, Magazine Section, p 10 (available online at http://www.raaf.org/Tribune.html).

  • Manovich L (2001a) The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich L (2001b) Post-media Aesthetics. DisLocations, Karlsruhe: ZKM/Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie, (available online at http://runme.org/project/+postmedia).

  • Manovich L (2003) Keynote: Inventing new media: What we can learn from new media art and media history. MM’03, November 2–8 Berkeley, California, ACM.

  • Marcus A and Gould E (2001) Cultural dimensions and global web design. Aaron Marcus and Associates, Emeryville, CA (available online at http://www.amanda.com/resources/hfweb2000/AMA_CultDim.pdf).

  • Mingers J (2003) The paucity of multimethod research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal (13:3), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates BJ (2004) Action research: Time to take a turn?. In Information Systems Research. Relevant Theory and Informed Practice (KAPLAN B, TRUEX D, WASTELL D, WOOD-HARPER T and DEGROSS J, Eds), pp 315–333, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ and Baroudi JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research (2:1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ and Iacono C (2001) Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artefact. Information Systems Research (12:2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul C (2003) Digital Art. Thames Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman R (2004) Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approac (6th edn). McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior L (2004) Documents. In Qualitative Research Practice (SEALE C, GOBO G, GUBRIUM JF and SILVERMAN D, Eds), pp 375–390, Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser J (Ed) (1998) Image-based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieser M (2002) The art of interactivity: Interactive installation from gallery to street. In Computers and Art (MEALING S, Ed.), pp 81–96, Intellect: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G (2001) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallabrass J (2003) Internet Art. The Online Clash of Culture and Commerce. Tate Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman LA (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tractinsky N (2004) Towards the study of aesthetics in information technology. In Proceedings Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, pp 771–780, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995) The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research (6:4), 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (2003) Editor's comments. Still desperately seeking the IT artefact. MIS Quarterly (27:2), iii–xi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel P (1992) Jury statement. In Ars Electronica Catalogue. Veritas-Verlag, Linz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westland JC (2004) The IS core XII: Authority, dogma and positive science in information systems research. Communications of AIS (13), 136–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Twenty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems (Las Vegas, December, 2005), where it was nominated for ‘Best Paper on Conference Theme’. Thanks to the paper discussant and audience members who offered useful suggestions for developing the work further.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, U.K.

    Briony J Oates

Authors
  1. Briony J Oates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Briony J Oates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oates, B. New frontiers for information systems research: computer art as an information system. Eur J Inf Syst 15, 617–626 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000649

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000649

Keywords

Search

Navigation