Abstract
We present a recent innovation to portfolio construction called full-scale optimisation. In contrast to mean–variance analysis, which assumes that returns are normally distributed or that investors have quadratic utility, full-scale optimisation identifies the optimal portfolio given any set of return distributions and any description of investor preferences. It therefore yields the truly optimal portfolio in sample, whereas mean–variance analysis provides an approximation to the in-sample truth. Both approaches, however, suffer from estimation error. We employ a bootstrapping procedure to compare the estimation error of full-scale optimisation to the combined approximation and estimation error of mean–variance analysis. We find that, to a significant degree, the in-sample superiority of full-scale optimisation prevails out of sample.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adler, T., Kritzman, M. Mean–variance versus full-scale optimisation: In and out of sample. J Asset Manag 7, 302–311 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2250042
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2250042