Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting for intermittent demand: the estimation of an unbiased average

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The majority of the range of items held by many stockists exhibit intermittent demand. Accurate forecasting of the issue rate for such items is important and several methods have been developed, but all produce biased forecasts to a greater or lesser degree. This paper derives the bias expected when the order arrivals follows a Poisson process, which leads to a correction factor for application in practice. Extensions to some other arrival processes are briefly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boylan JE and Syntetos AA (2003). Intermittent demand forecasting: size-interval methods based on averaging and smoothing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Methods in Industry and Commerce. Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RG (1963). Smoothing, Forecasting and Prediction. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 107–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin TA (1969). Time to sell a fixed quantity of stock depleted by distributed demand. Opl Res Q 20: 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin TA (1975). The Gamma distribution and inventory control. Opl Res Q 18: 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C and Goodhardt GJ (1973). A consumer purchasing model with Erlang inter-purchase times. J Am Statist Ass 40: 828–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CE (1957). Mathematical analysis of an inventory case. Opl Res 5: 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croston JD (1972). Forecasting and stock control for intermittent demands. Opl Res Q 23: 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves AHC and Kingsman BG (2004). Forecasting for the ordering and stock-holding of spare parts. J Opl Res Soc 55: 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans M, Hastings N and Peacock B (2000). Statistical Distributions, 3rd edn, Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher DJ (1969). Two periodic review inventory models with backorders and stuttering Poisson demands. AIIE Trans 1: 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RM and Odoni WK (1988). Time to sell a given quantity of stock. J Opl Res Soc 39: 969–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FR, Boylan JE, Meadows M and Shale EA (1999). Some properties of simple moving averages when applied to forecasting a time series. J Opl Res Soc 50: 1267–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston FR, Boylan JE and Shale EA (2003). An examination of the size of orders from customers, their characterisation and the implications for the inventory control of slow moving items. J Opl Res Soc 54: 833–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan HW (1991). On the demand distributions of slow moving items. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2001). On the bias of intermittent demand estimates. Int J Prod Econ 71: 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2005). The accuracy of intermittent demand estimates. Int J Forecasting 21: 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JB (1978). Determining re-order points when demand is lumpy. Mngt Sci 24: 623–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson RB (1987). The effects of demand-forecast fluctuations on customer service and inventory costs when demand is lumpy. J Opl Res Soc 38: 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E A Shale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shale, E., Boylan, J. & Johnston, F. Forecasting for intermittent demand: the estimation of an unbiased average. J Oper Res Soc 57, 588–592 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602031

Keywords

Navigation