Skip to main content
Log in

The Servants of Obama's Machinery: F.A. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom Revisited? — A Reply

  • Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper replies to “The Servants of Obama's Machinery,” which is a criticism of Boettke's interpretation of Hayek's ideas in The Road to Serfdom. We find the authors raise many interesting questions for both political economy and history of thought but ultimately are unconvincing in their critique. In addition to responding to their overall critique, we also respond to their smaller points on Hayek and Arrow, Public Choice, and the historical problems they raise. Despite our disagreement we believe this is a fruitful line of discussion and deserves to be looked into further both theoretically and empirically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Caldwell's introduction to Hayek's [2007].

  2. See also Ostrom's [1973] The Intellectual Crisis of American Public Administration.

  3. The work of Merkle [1980] on the ideology of the international scientific management movement is essential background reading for these discussions. Also see Rodgers [1998] on the role of social politics in Europe and the United States at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century.

  4. Keynes in the same letter to Hayek from June 28, 1944 about The Road to Serfdom even stated, “morally and philosophically I find myself in agreement with virtually the whole of it; not only in agreement with it, but in a deeply moved agreement.” He did, however, go on, “You admit here and there that it is a question of knowing where to draw the line. You agree that the line has to be drawn somewhere, and that the logical extreme is not possible. But you give us no guidance whatever as to where to draw it” (quoted in Hayek's [2007, p. 24]).

  5. See Hayek's [1948] essay Individualism: True and False, especially his discussion of Smith and his contemporaries and how they wanted to find a system in which bad men will be able to do least harm, rather than finding a system where the best and the brightest can rule.

  6. See also Hayek [1960], “Why I Am Not a Conservative,” postscripts to The Constitution of Liberty Hayek [1960, pp. 397–411].

  7. For a further development of this rather precursory statement, see Boettke and Leeson [2002]. It also picks up from a correspondence between Karen Vaughn and Buchanan on this issue, and also William Riker's [1982] Liberalism against Populism work in political science, which discusses a broader meaning of Arrow's theorem for a working democratic system.

References

  • Boettke, P.J. 1995. Hayek's Road to Serfdom Revisited: Government Failure in the Argument against Socialism. Eastern Economic Journal, 21 (1): 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. 2005. On Reading Hayek: Choice, Consequences and The Road to Serfdom. European Journal of Political Economy, 21 (4): 1042–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J., and P.T. Leeson . 2002. Hayek, Arrow, and the Problem of Democratic Decision-Making. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 20 (1): 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., T. Uebel, J. Cat, and L. Fleck . 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Croly, H. 1909. The Promise of America Life. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1944 [2007]. The Road to Serfdom: The Definitive Edition, edited by Bruce Caldwell. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A. 1944. The Economics of Control. London: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, J. 1980. Management and Ideology: The Legacy of the International Scientific Management Movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. 1922 [1981]. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. 1973. The Intellectual Crisis of American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. 1937. Economic Planning and Economic Order. London: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, D. 1998. Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. 2011. The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. 1948. Economics. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. 1992. The Endogenous Public Choice Theorist. Public Choice, 73: 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boettke, P., Snow, N. The Servants of Obama's Machinery: F.A. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom Revisited? — A Reply. Eastern Econ J 38, 428–433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2011.19

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2011.19

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation