Skip to main content
Log in

Does Month of Birth Affect Individual Health and Educational Attainment in Iceland?

  • Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explored the relationship between month of birth and later outcomes; self-assessed health and years of schooling using ordered probit models with Icelandic data. Results did not confirm an association between month of birth and later outcomes at traditional levels of significance. However, examination of point estimates revealed a relationship that is somewhat consistent with results from the United States, where those born in the first quarter of the year have less educational attainment than those born in other quarters of the year. Of the four possible mechanisms considered, parent’s socioeconomic status is most likely to affect the relationship under study. Future research should explore family background further using data with greater statistical power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data consisted of all men born 1930–1949 in the 1980 census 5 percent sample. Sample size was 312,718 for 1930–1939 cohort and 457,181 for 1940–1949 cohort [Angrist and Krueger 1991]. Buckles and Hungerman used data consisting of males born between 1944–1955 in the 1980 census. Sample size was 1,090,826 (2013).

  2. The beginning and end of compulsory schooling are both a function of date of birth, but in different ways, leading to variability in the length of compulsory schooling by date of birth. Most states in the United States require students to enter school in the calendar year in which they turn 6. In states with a December 31 birthday cut-off, those born late in the year are relatively young for their grade. That way, children born in the fourth quarter enter school at age 5 ¾, while those born in the first quarter enter school at age 6 ¾. As compulsory schooling laws typically require students to remain in school until their 16th birthdays, these groups of students will have had different amounts of schooling when they reach the legal dropout age. This is the rationale for Angrist and Krueger‘s approach in 1991.

  3. It may be of interest to know that the reason for the quarter of birth division in Angrist and Krueger‘s study is that data for seperate months was not available from the US Census. Their analysis was thus constrained by using quarter of birth instead of month of birth that could be less sensitivite to proposed variability in education.

  4. Buckles and Hungerman also used quarter of birth from census data for years 1960 and 1980 when studying mother characteristics, years of schooling, and wages (male sample). Sample sizes varied from 927,954–1,090,826 depending on dependent variable being observed. Their data from Natality Files, 1989–2001 included 52,041,054 observations that they used to study variations in mother characteristics by month of birth.

References

  • Almond, D. 2006. Is the 1918 Influenza Pandemic Over? Long-Term Effects of In Utero Influenza Exposure in the Post-1940 US Population. Journal of Political Economy, 114 (4): 672–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J.D., and A.B. Krueger . 1991. Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (4): 979–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D.J.P. 1995. Fetal Origins of Coronary Heart-Disease. British Medical Journal, 311 (6998): 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D.J.P. 2001 Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 149 (1): S2–S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D.J.P., and C. Osmond . 1986. Infant-Mortality, Childhood Nutrition, and Ischemic-Heart-Disease in England and Wales. Lancet, 1 (8489): 1077–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basso, O., J. Olsen, L. Bisanti, S. Juul, J. Boldsen, W. Karmaus, and R. Biczysko . 1995. Are Seasonal Preferences in Pregnancy Planning a Source of Bias in Studies of Seasonal-Variation in Reproductive Outcomes. Epidemiology, 6 (5): 520–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedard, K., and E. Dhuey . 2006. The Persistence of Early Childhood Maturity: International Evidence of Long-Run age Effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (4): 1437–1472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobak, M., and A. Gjonca . 2001. The Seasonality of Live Birth is Strongly Influenced by Sociodemographic Factors. Human Reproduction, 16 (7): 1512–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., D.A. Jaeger, and R.M. Baker . 1995. Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90 (430): 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckles, K.S., and D.M. Hungerman . 2013. Season of Birth and Later Outcomes: Old Questions, New Answers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (3): 711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castrogiovanni, P., S. Iapichino, C. Pacchierotti, and F. Pieraccini . 1998. Season of Birth in Psychiatry — A Review. Neuropsychobiology, 37 (4): 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesher, A. 2007. Instrumental Values. Journal of Econometrics, 139 (1): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, R.G., and R. Scaglion . 1982. The Ecology of Human Birth Seasonality. Human Ecology, 10 (4): 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doblhammer, G., and J.W. Vaupel . 2001. Lifespan Depends on Month of Birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(5), 2934–2939.

  • Fogel, R.W., and D.L. Costa . 1997. A Theory of Technophysio Evolution, with Some Implications for Forecasting Population, Health Care Costs, and Pension Costs. Demography, 34 (1): 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, J.D. 1994. Epidemiology of Unintended Pregnancy and Contraceptive Use. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 170 (5): 1485–1489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillberg, C. 1990. Do Children with Autism have March Birthdays. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 82 (2): 152–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gortmaker, S.L., J. Kagan, A. Caspi, and P.A. Silva . 1997. Daylength During Pregnancy and Shyness in Children: Results from Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Developmental Psychobiology, 31 (2): 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 2008. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., and R. Kaestner eds. 1997. Effects of Education on Health. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerheide, L., F. Kleibergen, and H.K. van Dijk . 2007. Natural Conjugate Priors for the Instrumental Variables Regression Model Applied to the Angrist-Krueger data. Journal of Econometrics, 138 (1): 63–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, S., R. Didham, and M. Fieder . 2008. Month of Birth and Offspring Count of Women: Data from the Southern Hemisphere. Human Reproduction, 23 (5): 1187–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icelandic Meteorologic Office. 2014. http://en.vedur.is/ (accessed May 10, 2014).

  • Idler, E.L., and Y. Benyamini . 1997. Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38 (1): 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E.L., and S. Kasl . 1991. Health Perceptions and Survival — Do Global Evaluations of Health-Status Really Predict Mortality. Journals of Gerontology, 46 (2): S55–S65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestenbaum, B. 1987. Seasonality of Birth: Two Findings from the Decennial Census. Social Biology, 34 (3–4): 244–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlbom, M., and S.E. Johansson . 2004. Month of Birth, Socioeconomic Background and Development in Swedish Men. Journal of Biosocial Science, 36 (5): 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D.A., and J.A. Miron . 1991. Seasonality of Births in Human-Populations. Social Biology, 38 (1–2): 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D.A., and J.A. Miron . 1994. Global Patterns of Seasonal Variation in Human Fertility. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 709 (1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, A., and C. Ryan . 2008. Estimating Returns to Education using Different Natural Experiment Techniques. Economics of Education Review, 27 (2): 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. 1993. Season of Birth and Dyslexia — Reply. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 (6): 1307–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., and G.V. Jones . 1999. Handedness and Season of Birth: A Gender-Invariant Relation. Cortex, 35 (1): 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccallum, J., B. Shadbolt, and D. Wang . 1994. Self-Rated Health and Survival — A 7-Year Follow-up-Study of Australian Elderly. American Journal of Public Health, 84 (7): 1100–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plug, E.J.S. 2001. Season of Birth, Schooling and Earnings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22 (5): 641–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procopio, M., P.K. Marriott, and R.J.E. Davies . 2006. Seasonality of Birth in Epilepsy: A Southern Hemisphere Study. Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy, 15 (1): 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J.L., and J.R. Udry . 1988. The Season-of-Birth Paradox. Social Biology, 35 (3–4): 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Iceland. 2010a. Population by Sex and Age, http://www.statice.is/?PageID=1170&src=/temp_en/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=MAN00101%26ti=Population+by+sex+and+age+1841%2D2010++++%26path=../Database/mannfjoldi/Yfirlit/%26lang=1%26units=Number (accessed December 1, 2010).

  • Statistics Iceland. 2010b. Births by Months, http://www.statice.is/?PageID=1175&src=/temp_en/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=MAN05302%26ti=Births+by+months+1853%2D2008+++++%26path=../Database/mannfjoldi/faeddir/%26lang=1%26units=number (accessed December 1, 2010).

  • The Ministry of Science Education and Culture. 2004. Results from PISA 2003, http://www.menntamalaraduneyti.is/frettir/Frettatilkynningar/nr/2905 (accessed May 10, 2014).

  • Tochigi, M., Y. Okazaki, N. Kato, and T. Sasaki . 2004. What Causes Seasonality of Birth in Schizophrenia? Neuroscience Research, 48 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Iceland. 2010. Student´s Registration Data, http://www.hi.is/is/skolinn/heildarskraning_nemenda_i_haskola_islands_fra_upphafi_0 (accessed December 15, 2010).

  • Weinberg, C.R., E. Moledor, and D.D. Baird . 1994. Is There a Seasonal Pattern in Risk of Early-Pregnancy Loss. Epidemiology, 5 (5): 484–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J.A., R.S. Scott, B.A. Darlow, H. Lewy, I. Ashkenazi, and Z. Laron . 2002. Seasonality of Birth and Onset of Clinical Disease in Children and Adolescents (0–19 Years) with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, 15 (5): 645–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Economic Forum. 2009. The Global Gender Gap Report, http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/report2009.pdf (accessed December 15, 2010).

  • Zoega, H., U. Valdimarsdottir, and S. Hernandez-Diaz . 2012. Age, Academic Performance, and Stimulant Prescribing for ADHD: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Pediatrics, 130 (6): 1012–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendix A

Seasonal patterns in birth

Pronounced and persistent seasonal patterns in births have been observed across human populations [Lam and Miron 1991, 1994]. These seasonal patterns have raised questions about the behavioral and biological determinants of reproduction. The seasonality of births varies between populations. In Northern Europe most births occur in the spring (March−April) whereas birth rates are lowest in the autumn (October−December). In the United States, by contrast, most births occur in the summer and early autumn (September peak) and the minimum is in spring (April−May) [Lam and Miron 1994].

Figure A1 shows birth frequency in Iceland for years corresponding to the data used in this analysis separated into two periods to show more precisely the pattern in birth frequency. This pattern is in line with patterns as described by Lam and Miron for the Northern Hemisphere with most births occurring in April−May and lowest birth rates close to the end of the year.

Figure A1
figure 2

Birth frequency per month in Iceland [Statistics Iceland 2010b].

The causes of these seasonal variations are not fully understood. Possible explanations may partly be linked to seasonal fluctuations in environmental factors, such as temperature and photoperiod (daily exposure to light). The effect of temperature on conception may result from changes in coital frequency or may reflect direct physiological effects. Lam and Miron [1994] found mixed evidence on the role of temperature in explaining birth seasonality and suggest that other factors play an important role in birth seasonality. The Southern US pattern appears to be heavily influenced by summer heat, but the Northern European pattern appears to have little to do with temperature.

One proposed explanation for the summer heat effect is related to a socioeconomic differential in birth seasonality [Kestenbaum 1987]. Kestenbaum found more pronounced birth seasonality in lower socioeconomic groups (measured by parental income) and interprets that as a reflection of the greater ability of those better-off to control climate, for example, through air-conditioning. In a study by Buckles and Hungerman [2013], summer weather is claimed to differentially affect fertility patterns across socioeconomic groups with those in lower groups being more affected than others. This is in contrast to other results that have found more pronounced birth seasonality within higher socioeconomic groups as measured by education, age, and marital status [Bobak and Gjonca 2001], which may indicate that those in higher socioeconomic groups have more control of their reproduction by individual choices. These theories are contradictory as to whether birth seasonality is more pronounced in higher or lower socioeconomic groups. At the same time they emphasize different explanations to birth seasonality; temperature, and preferences.

A photoperiod is often linked to weather conditions in this literature but there is little evidence on the proposed effect of a photoperiod on birth seasonality. Other proposed explanations to birth seasonality are seasonality in pregnancy loss [Weinberg et al. 1994] or cultural factors like the choice of the time of pregnancy [Basso et al. 1995]. Seasonal patterns in marriages, holidays, temporary migration, and economic variables, including agricultural cycles are among speculations that have been documented [Lam and Miron 1991]. Religious festivals, business cycles, and the existence of occupations requiring the temporary absence of the husband have also been cited as determinants of birth seasonality [Condon and Scaglion 1982].

Appendix B

Regression of quarters of birth on years of schooling

Table B1

Table B1 Regression

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ólafsdóttir, T., Ásgeirsdóttir, T. Does Month of Birth Affect Individual Health and Educational Attainment in Iceland?. Eastern Econ J 41, 329–345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.20

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation