Skip to main content
Log in

Subsidization and Privatization: In a Multinational Mixed Oligopoly

  • Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a single multinational market where private and public firms from different nationalities compete. The model allows the domestic government to subsidize its firms. In contrast to previous studies in this model, the subsidy varies with the market structure. Privatizing either the domestic public firm or the foreign public firm or both of them unambiguously increases the optimal subsidy rate and domestic social welfare. Nonetheless, both countries would benefit from simultaneous privatization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details on the international commercial airline industry, see Doganis [2001].

  2. Fjell and Heywood [2004] point out that these results depend critically on the assumption of the timing of moves after privatization. They show that privatization affects the optimal subsidy if the public firm remains a leader after privatization.

  3. Neither are price and marginal cost related linearly as Sepahvand's [2002] adjusted marginal cost pricing indicates.

References

  • Borenstein, S., and N. Rose . 1994. Competition and Price Dispersion in the US Airline Industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102 (4): 653–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., M. Marchand, and J. Thisse . 1989. The Public Firm as an Instrument for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market. Oxford Economic Papers, 41 (2): 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., M. Marchand, and J. Thisse . 1991. Mixed Oligopoly with Differentiated Products. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9 (1): 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadpay, A., and J.S. Heywood. 2006. Mixed Oligopoly in a Single International Market. Australian Economic Papers, 45 (4): 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFraja, G., and F. Delbono . 1989. Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41 (2): 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFraja, G., and F. Delbono . 1990. Game Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly. Journal of Economic Surveys, 4 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doganis, R. 2001. The Airline Business in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C. 1990. The Interdependence between Ownership Status and Market Structure: The Case of Privatization. Economica, 57: 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjell, K., and D. Pal . 1996. A Mixed Oligopoly in the presence of Foreign Private Firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29 (3): 737–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjell, K., and J. Heywood . 2004. Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firm’s Moves: The Relevance of Privatization. Economic Letters, 83 (3): 411–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.G., and E.G. Wiens . 1980. Government Enterprise: An Instrument for the Internal Regulation of Industry. Canadian Journal of Economics, 13 (1): 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merril, W.C., and N. Schneider . 1966. Government Firms in Oligopoly Industries: A Short Run Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (3): 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myles, G. 2002. Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: An Irrelevance Result for the General Case. Economics Bulletin, 12 (1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilssen, T., and L. Sorgard . 2002. A Public Firm Challenged by Entry: Duplication or Diversity? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32 (2): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, D., and M.D. White . 1998. Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy. Southern Economic Journal, 65 (2): 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, D., and M.D. White . 2003. Intra-Industry Trade and Strategic Trade Policy in the Presence of Public Firms. International Economic Journal, 17 (4): 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poyago-Theotoky, J. 2001. Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: An Irrelevance Result. Economics Bulletin, 12 (3): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepahvand, M. 2002. Privatization in a Regulated Market, Open to Foreign Competition, Discussion Paper No. 02/04, University of Nottingham.

  • Sertel, M. 1988. Regulation by Participation. Journal of Economics, 48 (2): 114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank John Heywood, Gilbert Skillman and two anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. Any shortcoming is his and his alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendix A

Firms’ outputs equilibrium values when domestic government subsidizes domestic firms unilaterally.

Domestic private firm output:

Foreign private firm output:

Domestic Public firm output:

Foreign public firm output:

Total output:

Equilibrium price:

Appendix B

Appendix C

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dadpay, A. Subsidization and Privatization: In a Multinational Mixed Oligopoly. Eastern Econ J 40, 5–25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2012.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2012.23

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation