Skip to main content
Log in

External Financing and the Survival of Black-Owned Start-Ups in the US

  • Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since black-owned businesses tend to have access to lower informal financing, we hypothesize that, obtaining commercial financing should play a compensating role and have a stronger marginal effect on black-owned businesses than on businesses owned by other racial groups. Unexpectedly, we find that, while the use of commercial financing reduces the exit rates of new firms in general, the reduction is not significantly different across racial groups. We attribute this result to unobserved heterogeneity linked, at least in part, to the owner’s start-up capital and to other beneficial externalities that access to informal investors produces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Fairlie and Robb [2008] provide a comprehensive analysis of entrepreneurial trends across racial groups. Parker [2009, Ch. 5] provides a review of the economics literature on racial entrepreneurship.

  2. Following Robb et al [2009], we use the primary owner’s information for multiple-owner firms. The primary owner is defined as the owner with the largest equity share. When owners with equal share are present, weekly hours spent in the business are used to identify the primary owner.

  3. The average number of hours per week the owner spent on the business can be viewed as an indicator of whether this is a full- or part-time venture, and as a proxy for owners’ effort. It should also be noted that the risk classes are self-reported and may not measure accurately the objective exposure to risk of failure.

  4. Business credit card shares many features of commercial bank loans because of how credit worthiness is evaluated, and because of their debt-based nature and reliance on commercial banks and financial institutions.

  5. In an alternative approach, this problem could be addressed by re-arranging the data we use for our logit estimation. Namely, we could eliminate all observations after they switch from Y=0 to Y=1. In this way, the logit model is equivalent to a discrete time logistic hazard rate model [Jenkins 1995]. We chose not to proceed with this option to avoid losing observations.

  6. In nearest neighbor matching, a firm that did not use commercial financing is matched to a firm that used it if the absolute difference of propensity scores is the smallest among all possible pairs. In caliper matching, instead, a pair is found if the absolute difference of propensity scores is below a pre-specified threshold (0.05 in our case).

  7. Results from these logit models are not shown but are available from the authors upon request. In general, they show that black businesses, businesses of other races, and businesses owned by women are significantly less likely to use commercial financing than businesses owned by white men. They also suggest that an increase in the number of full- and part-time employees significantly increases the chances of using commercial financing, whereas higher credit risk lowers it significantly.

  8. Using data from the first year of the survey, we used socio-economic and demographic variable to predict the probability of using commercial financing. Compared to white business owners, black business owners exhibit 12.7 percent lower probability of using commercial financing after controlling for demographic and socio-economic factors. This self-selection effect may be explained by several reasons including discriminatory lending, lack of information, and fear of denial.

  9. Notably, an alternative and superior specification of the model would include a dummy variable for commercial financing, the race dummies, and two interaction terms (black*commercial financing and other race*commercial financing). The coefficients on the interaction terms would then indicate whether racial differences in the effects of commercial financing are present. We use the current and equivalent specification to maintain consistency across robustness checks.

  10. It should be noted that, when the actual amount of financing is used, the exact magnitudes of the marginal effect may be biased for two reasons. First, many business owners did not report the amount even though they reported using commercial financing. This under-reporting clearly affects the estimated marginal effect. Second, the amounts of commercial financing are highly skewed among recipients with some owners receiving very large amounts and others receiving very small ones. Given these problems, caution should be used when interpreting the results shown in the Panel.

  11. Due to space constraints, the tables displaying the results of our robustness tests are not included in the paper. They are available upon request from the authors.

References

  • Aldrich, H., J. Cater, T. Jones, D. McEvoy, and P. Velleman . 1985. Ethnic Residential Concentration and the Protected Market Hypothesis. Social Forces, 63 (4): 996–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astebro, T., and I. Bernhardt . 2003. Start-Up Financing, Owner Characteristics and Survival. Journal of Economics and Business, 55 (4): 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, R.B., R. W. Bostic, and K. A. Samolyk . 1998. The Role of Personal Wealth in Small Business Finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22 (6): 1019–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. 1974. Financing Black Enterprise. The Journal of Finance, 29 (3): 747–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. 1990. Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72 (4): 551–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. 1991. Commercial Bank Financing of White- and Black-Owned Small Business Start-Ups. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 31 (1): 64–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. 2000. Financing the development of urban minority communities: Lessons of history. Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (3): 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., and A. Robb . 2008. Analysis of Young Neighborhood Firms Serving Urban Minority Clients. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-08-11,http://ssrn.com/abstract=1143382, accessed May 2013.

  • Beck, T., and A. Demirguc-Kunt . 2006. Small and Medium-Size Enterprises: Access to Finance as a Growth Constraint. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30 (11): 2931–2943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, OS., and M. Caliendo . 2007. Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects. The Stata Journal, 7 (1): 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., D. Chugh, and S. Mullainathan . 2005. New Approaches to Discrimination: Implicit Discrimination. American Economic Review, 95 (2): 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, L., B. Zhao, and J. Yinger . 2008. Do Lenders Discriminate against Minority and Women Entrepreneurs? Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (4): 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G., P. Levine, and D. Zimmerman . 2003. Discrimination in the Small Business Credit Market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (4): 930–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P., and R. Townsend . 1996. Formal and Informal Financing in Chicago Ethnic Neighbourhood. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, 20 (4): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G., and S. Bronars . 1989. Consumer Discrimination and Self-Employment. Journal of Political Economy, 97 (3): 581–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.L. 2006. Transformation of the Black Elite. Social Science Quarterly, 87 (3): 602–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, W.D. 2003. The Wealth Dynamics of Entrepreneurship for Black and White Families in the U.S. Review of Income and Wealth, 49 (1): 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubna, A. 2006. Relational Distance and Contracting — Family in Credit Markets. Working Paper, Hyderabad: Indian School of Business.

  • Bygrave, W., and N. Bosma . 2011. Investor Altruism: Financial Returns from Informal Investments in Businesses Owned by Relatives, Friends, and Strangers, in The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship: Evidence from GEM Data, edited by M. Minniti. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalluzzo, K., and J. Wolken . 2005. Small Business Loan Turndowns, Personal Wealth and Discrimination. Journal of Business, 78 (6): 2153–2177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleves, M., W. Gould, R. G. Gutierrez, and Y. Marchenko . 2008. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata, 2nd edn., Texas, USA: StataCorp LP, Stata Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S., and S. Tennyson . 1992. Labor Market Discrimination, Imperfect Information and Self-Employment. Oxford Economic Papers, 44 (2): 272–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. 1996. Are Business start-ups Debt Rationed? Economic Journal, 106 (438): 1253–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T., and D. Holtz-Eakin . 2000. Financial Capital, Human Capital and the Transition to Self-Employment: Evidence from Intergenerational Links. Journal of Labor Economics, 18 (2): 282–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymski, G., and L. Mohanty . 1999. Financial Services in the Black Community — Credit and Banking Structure: Asian and African-American Experience in Los Angeles. American Economic Review, 89 (2): 362–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.S., and B. Jovanovic . 1989. An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97 (4): 808–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, G.B. 2008. Residential Segregation Influences on the Likelihood of Black and White Self-Employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (1): 46–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. 1999. The Absence of the African-American Owned Business: An analysis of the Dynamics of Self-Employment. Journal of Labor Economics, 17 (1): 80–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. 2004 Recent Trends in Ethnic and Racial Business Ownership. Small Business Economics, 23 (3): 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R., and A. Robb . 2007. Why are Black Owned Businesses Less Successful than White Owned Businesses? The Role of Families, Inheritances and Business Human Capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 25 (2): 289–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R., and A. Robb . 2008. Race and Entrepreneurial Success: Black, Asian, and White-Owned Businesses in the United States. Cambridge, Massachusett, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R., and B.D. Meyer . 2000. Trends in Self-Employment among White and Black Men during the Twentieth Century. Journal of Human Resources, 35 (1): 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangl, M. 2004. RBOUNDS: Stata Module to Perform Rosenbaum Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects on the Treated, http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s438301.

  • Girma, S., H. Gorg, and E. Strobl . 2007. The Effects of Government Grants on Plant Survival: A Micro-Econometric Analysis. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25 (4): 701–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfaian, and H. Rosen . 1994. Sticking it Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 102 (1): 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M., and H. Rosen . 2000. Self-Employment, Family Background, and Race. Journal of Human Resources, 35 (4): 670–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S.P. 1995. Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration Models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57 (1): 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köllinger, P., and M. Minniti . 2006. Not for Lack of Trying: American Entrepreneurship in Black and White. Small Business Economics, 27 (1): 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, I., and E. Bonacich . 1988. Immigrant entrepreneurs: Koreans in Los Angeles 1965–1982. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Máñez, J., M.E. Rochina, and J. A. Sanchis . 2006. Using Survival Models with Individual Data. Workshop on Entrepreneurship Statistics, University of Huelva, Huelva, February 7–8.

  • Manski, C.F. 2007. Identification for Prediction and Decision. Cambridge, Massachusett, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. 1990. Why Are There So Few Black Entrepreneurs? NBER Working Paper No. 3537. Department of Economics Northwestern University 2003 Sheridan Road Evanston, IL, USA 60208.

  • Myrdal, G. 1944. An American Dilemma. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. 2009. The Economics of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, Massachusett, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peel, M., and G.H. Makepeace . 2009. Propensity Score Matching in Accounting Research and Rosenbaum Bounds Analysis for Confounding Variables. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1485734 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1485734, accessed 8 October 2009.

  • Peel, M.J., and G.H. Makepeace . 2012. Differential Audit Quality, Propensity Score Matching and Rosenbaum Bounds for Confounding Variables. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39 (5–6): 606–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A. 2000. The Role of Race, Gender, and Discrimination in Business Survival, Dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

  • Robb, A., and R. Fairlie . 2007. Access to Financial Capital among U.S. Businesses: The Case of African American Firms. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 613 (1): 47–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A.M., R.W. Fairlie, and D.T. Robinson . 2009. Financial Capital Injections among New Black and White Business Ventures: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey, unpublished paper, University of California, Santa Cruz and Duke University, USA.

  • Slottje, D.J., D. Millimet, and M.J. Buchanan . 2007. Econometric Analysis of Copyrights. Journal of Econometrics, 139 (2): 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walstad, W.B., and M.L. Kourilsky . 1998. Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Knowledge of Black Youth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (2): 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltbank, R. 2005. Investment Practices and Outcomes of Informal Venture Investors. Venture Capital, 7 (4): 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltbank, R., and S. Sarasvathy . 2002. Selection and Return in Angel Investment. in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by W.D. Bygrave, G.B. Candida, P. Davidsson, J. Fiet, P.G. Greene, R.T. Harrison, M. Lerner, G.D. Meyer, J. Sohl, and A. Zacharakis. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. 2008. The Choice of Formal or Informal Finance: Evidence from Chengdu, China. China Economic Review, 19 (4): 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to two anonymous referees, Susan Averett, Philipp Koellinger, Roger Koppl, and E.J. Reedy for useful comments and suggestions. We thank the Kauffman Foundation for granting use of the data. Finally, Yunwei Gai acknowledges support from the Babson Faculty Research Fund. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2011 AEA Meeting in Denver, CO. All errors are ours.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gai, Y., Minniti, M. External Financing and the Survival of Black-Owned Start-Ups in the US. Eastern Econ J 41, 387–410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.23

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation