Skip to main content
Log in

Political Conflict and Entangled Social Logics in the Development of Institutional Capacity: Creating a Designated National Authority for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Institutional capacity development is commonly conceptualised in an instrumental way; the concern is how to implement policy and realise project designs by aligning institutional realities with policy prescriptions. When assessed against project aims, capacity development interventions are often partially successful and sometimes unsuccessful. Inspired by an actor-oriented approach to understanding the processes and outcomes of institutional capacity development, this article argues that the real logics of actors are not in line with the formal ideas and assumptions of the project. This argument is based on a case study of a project to develop capacity for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda implemented over 4 years in the mid-2000s. This article concludes that the politics of processes of institutional change are largely ignored in an instrumental approach, and, contrary to project expectations, the inputs of intervention are appropriated by actors in ways that run counter to the projects' objectives and methods.

Le développement des capacités institutionnelles est généralement conceptualisé de manière instrumentale; L’enjeu est de déterminer comment mettre en place des politiques et élaborer des projets en adaptant les réalités institutionnelles aux prescriptions politiques. Quand on évalue les mesures mises en œuvre pour développer les capacités, on constate qu’elles sont souvent partiellement couronnées de succès et qu’elles se soldent parfois par des échecs, au regard des objectifs des projets. Inspiré d’une approche axée sur les acteurs pour comprendre les processus et résultats du développement des capacités institutionnelles, cet article cherche à montrer que les logiques réelles des acteurs ne correspondent pas aux idées et hypothèses des projets qui sont énoncées. Cet argumentaire s’appuie sur une étude d’un projet de développement des capacités pour le Mécanisme de Développement Propre mis en place en Ouganda sur une période de quatre ans au milieu de la décennie 2000. L’article conclut que la politique de processus de changement institutionnel est très peu prise en compte par une approche instrumentale et que les acteurs se sont appropriés les apports des mesures prises d’une manière qui va à l’encontre des objectifs et méthodes des projets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The CDM defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol as a project and market-based mechanism for trading in greenhouse gas emission reductions between developed and developing countries. It has the double aim of achieving cost-effective emission reductions for developed countries and contributing to sustainable development in developing countries.

References

  • Akol, D. (2004) Creating a designated national authority for the clean development mechanism in Uganda. The Draft CDM Bill and Approval Procedures. Kampala, Environmental Law Resources Centre Uganda: 107.

  • Arce, A. and Long, N. (2007) Forging a new anthropology of development: Common ground and contentious issues. In: T. Bierschenk, G. Blundo, Y. Jaffré and M.T. Alou (eds.) Une anthropologie entre rigueur et engagement. Essais autour de Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan. Paris, France: Karthala, pp. 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, W. (1996) Partnership for capacity building in Africa, office of the vice president. Africa Region, The World Bank.

  • Bierschenk, T. (1988) Development projects as arenas of negotiation for strategic groups. Sociologia Ruralis XXVIII (2–3): 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierschenk, T. and Sardan, J.-P.O.d. (1997) ECRIS: Rapid collective inquiry for the identification of conflicts and strategic groups. Human Organization 56 (2): 238–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bwango, A., Wright, J., Elias, C. and Burton, I. (2000) Reconciling national and global priorities in adaptation to climate change: With an illustration from Uganda. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 61 (1): 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigaran, M.P. and Iturregui, P. (2004) Institutional strategy to promote the clean development mechanism in Peru, UNEP Risø centre on energy. Climate and Sustainable Development: 1–54.

  • Czarniawska, B. (1998) A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ECON. (2009) Capacity Building for CDM in Uganda. Oslo, Norway: Econ Pöyry, p. 37.

  • Engineering, D.o.M. (2006) Capacity Development for Clean Development Mechanism (CD4CDM) Uganda. Kampala, Makerere University: 37. Final Report.

  • Figueres, C. (2004) Institutional capacity to integrate economic development and climate change considerations. An Assessment of DNAs in Latin America and the Carribean, Inter-American Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department, Environment Division: 54.

  • Gastel, J.v. and Nuijten, M. (2003) The (Re-)Invention of ‘Ownership’. An Anthtropological/Organisational Approach to the Construction of a Policy Model at the Dutch Ministry of Development Co-Operation. First Draft, Order and Disjuncture: The Organisation of Aid and Development London: SOAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastel, J.v. and Nuijten, M. (2005) The genealogy of the ‘good governance’ and ‘ownership’ agenda at the Dutch ministry of development cooperation. In: D. Mosse and D. Lewis (eds.) The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. (2005) Timing, scale and style: Capacity as governmentality. In: D. Mosse and D. Lewis (eds.) The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development. London: Pluto Press, pp. 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., Khadiagala, L. and Moore, R. (1990) Institutional Development Work in the Bank: A Review of 84 Bank Projects. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (1996) Globalization and localization: New challenges to rural research. In: H.L. Moore (ed.) The Future of Anthropological Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (2001) Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (2004) Actors, interfaces and development intervention: Meanings, purposes and powers. In: T. Kontinen (ed.) Development Intervention: Actor and Activity Perspectives. Helsinki, Finland: Univeristy of Helsinki. Center for Activity Theory and Development Work Research and Institute for Development Studies, pp. 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and Ploeg, J.D.v.d. (1989) De-mythologizing planned intervention. Sociologia Ruralis 4 (29): 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and Villarreal, M. (1993) Exploring development interfaces: From the transfer of knowledge to the transformation of meaning. In: F.J. Schuurman (ed.) Beyond the Impasse. London and New Jersey: Zed Books, pp. 140–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, B.a. (2004) Legal Issues Guidebook to the Clean Development Mechanism. Roskilde, Denmark: UNEP Risø Centre, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meteorology, D.o. (2002) Uganda initial national communication to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Kampala, Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment, Uganda: 1–64.

  • Moore, M. (1995) Institution Building as a Development Assistance Method: A Review of Literature and Ideas. Stockholm, Sweden: SIDA, pp. 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S.F. (1987) Explaining the present: Theoretical dilemmas in processual ethnography. American Ethnologist 14 (4): 727–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2003) Good Policy is Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice, Order and Disjuncture: The organization of Aid Policy and Practice. London: SOAS, 26–28 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2004) Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change 35 (4): 639–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijenhuis, K. (2003) Does decentralisation serve everyone? The struggle for power in a malian village. The European Journal of Development Research 15 (2): 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1995) Developing Environmental Capacity: A Framework for Donor Involvement. Paris, France: OECD, p. 57.

  • OECD. (1999) Donor Support for Institutional Capacity Development in Environment: Lessons Learned. Paris, France: Development Assistance Committee, pp. 1–228.

  • Olsen, K.H. (2006a) National ownership in the implementation of global climate policy in Uganda. Climate Policy 5 (6): 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K.H. (2006b) Why planned interventions for capacity development in the environment often fail: A critical review of mainstream approaches. International Studies of Management and Organization 36 (2): 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (2004) The Political Economy of Governance Reforms in Uganda. Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardan, J.-P.O.d. (1988) Peasant logics and development project logics. Sociologia Ruralis XXVIII (2–3): 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardan, J.-P.O.d. (2005) Anthropology and Development: Understanding Contemporary Social Change. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Management Institute. (2003) Capacity Development Workplan for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Management Institute.

  • UNDP. (1997) Capacity Development, Management Development and Governance Division. Technical Advisory Paper 2.

  • UNDP. (1998) Capacity assessment and development. In a Systems and Strategic Management Context, Management Development and Governance Division, Bureau for Development Policy.

  • Wamukonya, N. (2001) Foreign direct investment (FDI) and the clean development mechanism (CDM): Is FDI threatened by CDM in Africa? Bulletin African 14: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H., Davidson, O. and Mwakasonda, S. (2005) Developing institutions for the clean development mechanism (CDM): African perspectives. Climate Policy 5 (2): 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Disclaimer: Arguments made in the article represent the personal views of the author and not the UNEP Risø Centre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsen, K. Political Conflict and Entangled Social Logics in the Development of Institutional Capacity: Creating a Designated National Authority for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda. Eur J Dev Res 24, 589–605 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.1

Keywords

Navigation