Skip to main content
Log in

Latin American Post-Neoliberal Development Thinking: The Bolivian ‘Turn’ Toward Suma Qamaña

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most innovative elements of the current Latin American post-neoliberal context is the attempt to rethink development from the point of view of indigenous cosmovisions. In the Andean region, this dynamic is exemplified by the crystallization of the Suma Qamaña or Living Well paradigm. I want to focus here specifically on the case of Bolivia, taking as my frame of reference the most comprehensive and systematic statement of the Movement Toward Socialism's (MAS) vision of development, namely, the National Development Plan (PND). An important ambiguity, I want to argue in this article, undergirds the PND. The PND elucidates Suma Qamaña from both alternative development and post-development perspectives. That is, the concept is developed as an alternative to liberal capitalism, on one hand, and as the more radical, postcolonial critique of modernity, on the other.

L′un des aspects les plus novateurs du contexte post-néolibéral qui prévaut actuellement en Amérique latine est la tentative de repenser le développement à travers les cosmovisions amérindiennes. Dans la région andine cette dynamique se manifeste par la cristallisation du paradigme du Suma Qamaña ou du Bien-Vivre. Je souhaite me concentrer ici sur le cas de la Bolivie, en prenant comme cadre de référence l′énoncé le plus complet et systématique de la vision de développement adoptée par le Mouvement vers le Socialisme (MAS), à savoir le Plan National de Développement (PND). Je cherche à montrer dans cet article qu′une ambiguïté importante sous-tend le PND. Le PND offre une clarification du concept de Suma Qamaña à travers les perspectives tant du développement alternatif que du post-développement. Ainsi, le concept se développe comme une alternative au capitalisme libéral, d′une part, et comme la critique postcoloniale plus radicale de la modernité, de l′autre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhabha, H.K. (1994) The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S. (2010) Entrevista con François Houtart: Por un bien común general de la humanidad. America Latina en Movimiento (ALAI), Sumak Kawsay: Recuperar el sentido de la vida 452 (February): 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. (1991) Toward development ethics. World Development 19 (5): 457–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, P. (2008) El ‘Sumak Kawsay’ (‘Buen vivir’) y las cesuras del desarrollo. América Latina en Movimiento, Agencia Latinoamericana de Información (ALAI). 6 May. http://alainet.org/active/23920, accessed December 2011.

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1972) L’Anti-Oedipe: Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devés Valdés, E. (2000–2004) El Pensamiento Latinoamericano en el Siglo XX: Entre la Modernidad y la Identidad, Vols. 1–2. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana/Editorial Biblos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do Alto, H. (2011) Un partido campesino en el poder: Una Mirada sociológica del MAS boliviano. Nueva Sociedad 234 (July–August): 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1992) Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements. Social Text 31/32: 20–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2006) Post-development. In: D.A. Clark (ed.) The Elgar Companion To Development Studies. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 447–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2010) Latin America at the crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies 24 (1): 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (2002) Revisiting Westphalia, discovering Post-Westphalia. Journal of Ethics 6 (4): 311–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1976) To Have or to Be?. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Linera, A. (2011) Las tensiones creativas de la revolución: La quinta fase del Proceso de Cambio. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional/Presidencia de la Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnecker, M. and Fuentes, F. (2008) MAS-IPSP: Instrumento político que surge de los movimientos sociales. Centro Internacional Miranda, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huanacuni Mamani, F. (2010) Vivir Bien/Buen Vivir: Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales. Lima, Peru: Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2006) La deriva populista y la centroizquierda latinoamericana. Nueva Sociedad 205 (September–October): 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1979) La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamani Vargas, J. and Borda, T.R. (eds.) (2010) Historia, coyuntura y descolonización: Katarismo e indianismo en el proceso político del MAS en Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: Fondo Editorial Pukara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W.D. (2002) The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (1): 57–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Planificación y Desarrollo (MPD). (2007) Plan nacional de desarrollo: Bolivia digna, soberana, productiva y democrática para vivir bien – Lineamientos estratégicos, 2006–2011. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministerio de Planificación Desarrollo.

  • Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS). (2009) Bolivia País Líder: 2010–2015 Programa de Gobierno. La Paz, Bolivia: MAS.

  • Nussbaum, M. (1987) Nature, Function and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distrubition. Working Paper 31, World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER), United Nations University, Helsinki.

  • Nussbaum, M. (1992) Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20 (2): 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2002) Capabilities and social justice. International Studies Review 4 (2): 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, J.L. (2010) En Torno al Pensamiento del Intelectual Aymara Simón Yampara. Reflexión Política 12 (24): 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J. (2012) Experimentalist governance. In: D. Levi-Faur (ed.) Handbook on Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C.F. and Simon, W.H. (2010) Minimalism and Experimentalism in the Administrative State. Columbia Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper 9187.

  • Sachs, W. (ed.) (1992) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London and New Jersey: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo (SNPD). (2007) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2007–2010: Planificación para la Revolución Ciudadana. Quito, Equador: SENPLADES.

  • Sen, A. (1979) Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Stanford University, 22 May.

  • Sen, A. (1985a) Well-being agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures. The Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985b) The standard of living? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Cambridge University, 11 and 12 March.

  • Sen, A. (1997) What's the Point of a Development Strategy?. Development Economics Research Programme (DERP) Paper No. 3, London School of Economics, London, UK (April).

  • Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A. (2004) Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks Government and Opposition. America Latina en Movimiento (ALAI), Sumak Kawsay: Recuperar el sentido de la vida 39 (2 Spring): 159–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa Santos, B. (2007) La reinvención del Estado y el Estado plurinacional. Observatorio Social de América Latina (OSAL) VIII (22): 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spedding Pallet. (2010) ‘Suma qamaña’ ¿kamsañmuni? (¿Qué quiere decir ‘vivir bien’?). Revista Fe y Pueblo 17, Suma qamaña: Miradas críticas al Vivir Bien. La Paz: Instituto Superior Ecumenico Andino de Teologia (ISEAT).

  • Spivak, G.C. (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271–313.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Svampa, M. (2007) Introducción: Los múltiples rostros de Bolivia. In: M. Svampa y P. Stefanoni (eds.) Bolivia: Memoria, Insurgencia y Movimientos Sociales. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial El Colectivo, Osal-Clacso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svampa, M. (2010) Movimientos Sociales, matrices socio-políticos y nuevos escenarios en América Latina. Working Papers 01, Universität Kassel, Germany.

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1990) Human Development Report: Concept and Measurement of Human Development. New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1996) Human Development Report: Economic Growth and Human Development. New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correction

This article has been corrected online, as an administrative error replicated the article disclaimer in the English abstract. This has been corrected and the related disclaimer removed. Additionally, the original version of this paper stated the author's affiliation as UNESCAP when in fact no affiliation should have been given.

We apologise to the author for these errors and for any confusion caused to the reader.

This article has been developed from a paper originally presented at the EADI-DSA 2011 Annual Conference: ‘Rethinking Development in an Age of Scarcity and Uncertainty’, York, 19–22 September 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costoya, M. Latin American Post-Neoliberal Development Thinking: The Bolivian ‘Turn’ Toward Suma Qamaña. Eur J Dev Res 25, 213–229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.41

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.41

Keywords

Navigation