Abstract
One of the most innovative elements of the current Latin American post-neoliberal context is the attempt to rethink development from the point of view of indigenous cosmovisions. In the Andean region, this dynamic is exemplified by the crystallization of the Suma Qamaña or Living Well paradigm. I want to focus here specifically on the case of Bolivia, taking as my frame of reference the most comprehensive and systematic statement of the Movement Toward Socialism's (MAS) vision of development, namely, the National Development Plan (PND). An important ambiguity, I want to argue in this article, undergirds the PND. The PND elucidates Suma Qamaña from both alternative development and post-development perspectives. That is, the concept is developed as an alternative to liberal capitalism, on one hand, and as the more radical, postcolonial critique of modernity, on the other.
L′un des aspects les plus novateurs du contexte post-néolibéral qui prévaut actuellement en Amérique latine est la tentative de repenser le développement à travers les cosmovisions amérindiennes. Dans la région andine cette dynamique se manifeste par la cristallisation du paradigme du Suma Qamaña ou du Bien-Vivre. Je souhaite me concentrer ici sur le cas de la Bolivie, en prenant comme cadre de référence l′énoncé le plus complet et systématique de la vision de développement adoptée par le Mouvement vers le Socialisme (MAS), à savoir le Plan National de Développement (PND). Je cherche à montrer dans cet article qu′une ambiguïté importante sous-tend le PND. Le PND offre une clarification du concept de Suma Qamaña à travers les perspectives tant du développement alternatif que du post-développement. Ainsi, le concept se développe comme une alternative au capitalisme libéral, d′une part, et comme la critique postcoloniale plus radicale de la modernité, de l′autre.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhabha, H.K. (1994) The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
Burch, S. (2010) Entrevista con François Houtart: Por un bien común general de la humanidad. America Latina en Movimiento (ALAI), Sumak Kawsay: Recuperar el sentido de la vida 452 (February): 27–29.
Crocker, D. (1991) Toward development ethics. World Development 19 (5): 457–483.
Dávalos, P. (2008) El ‘Sumak Kawsay’ (‘Buen vivir’) y las cesuras del desarrollo. América Latina en Movimiento, Agencia Latinoamericana de Información (ALAI). 6 May. http://alainet.org/active/23920, accessed December 2011.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1972) L’Anti-Oedipe: Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Minuit.
Devés Valdés, E. (2000–2004) El Pensamiento Latinoamericano en el Siglo XX: Entre la Modernidad y la Identidad, Vols. 1–2. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana/Editorial Biblos.
Do Alto, H. (2011) Un partido campesino en el poder: Una Mirada sociológica del MAS boliviano. Nueva Sociedad 234 (July–August): 95–111.
Escobar, A. (1992) Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements. Social Text 31/32: 20–56.
Escobar, A. (2006) Post-development. In: D.A. Clark (ed.) The Elgar Companion To Development Studies. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 447–451.
Escobar, A. (2010) Latin America at the crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies 24 (1): 1–65.
Falk, R. (2002) Revisiting Westphalia, discovering Post-Westphalia. Journal of Ethics 6 (4): 311–352.
Fromm, E. (1976) To Have or to Be?. New York: Harper & Row.
García Linera, A. (2011) Las tensiones creativas de la revolución: La quinta fase del Proceso de Cambio. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional/Presidencia de la Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional.
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harnecker, M. and Fuentes, F. (2008) MAS-IPSP: Instrumento político que surge de los movimientos sociales. Centro Internacional Miranda, Caracas.
Huanacuni Mamani, F. (2010) Vivir Bien/Buen Vivir: Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales. Lima, Peru: Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas.
Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2006) La deriva populista y la centroizquierda latinoamericana. Nueva Sociedad 205 (September–October): 56–61.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979) La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Mamani Vargas, J. and Borda, T.R. (eds.) (2010) Historia, coyuntura y descolonización: Katarismo e indianismo en el proceso político del MAS en Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: Fondo Editorial Pukara.
Mignolo, W.D. (2002) The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (1): 57–96.
Ministerio de Planificación y Desarrollo (MPD). (2007) Plan nacional de desarrollo: Bolivia digna, soberana, productiva y democrática para vivir bien – Lineamientos estratégicos, 2006–2011. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministerio de Planificación Desarrollo.
Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS). (2009) Bolivia País Líder: 2010–2015 Programa de Gobierno. La Paz, Bolivia: MAS.
Nussbaum, M. (1987) Nature, Function and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distrubition. Working Paper 31, World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER), United Nations University, Helsinki.
Nussbaum, M. (1992) Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20 (2): 202–246.
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2002) Capabilities and social justice. International Studies Review 4 (2): 123–135.
Saavedra, J.L. (2010) En Torno al Pensamiento del Intelectual Aymara Simón Yampara. Reflexión Política 12 (24): 52–59.
Sabel, C. and Zeitlin, J. (2012) Experimentalist governance. In: D. Levi-Faur (ed.) Handbook on Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sabel, C.F. and Simon, W.H. (2010) Minimalism and Experimentalism in the Administrative State. Columbia Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper 9187.
Sachs, W. (ed.) (1992) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London and New Jersey: Zed Books.
Said, E. (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo (SNPD). (2007) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2007–2010: Planificación para la Revolución Ciudadana. Quito, Equador: SENPLADES.
Sen, A. (1979) Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Stanford University, 22 May.
Sen, A. (1985a) Well-being agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures. The Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221.
Sen, A. (1985b) The standard of living? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Cambridge University, 11 and 12 March.
Sen, A. (1997) What's the Point of a Development Strategy?. Development Economics Research Programme (DERP) Paper No. 3, London School of Economics, London, UK (April).
Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Slaughter, A. (2004) Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks Government and Opposition. America Latina en Movimiento (ALAI), Sumak Kawsay: Recuperar el sentido de la vida 39 (2 Spring): 159–190.
Sousa Santos, B. (2007) La reinvención del Estado y el Estado plurinacional. Observatorio Social de América Latina (OSAL) VIII (22): 25–46.
Spedding Pallet. (2010) ‘Suma qamaña’ ¿kamsañmuni? (¿Qué quiere decir ‘vivir bien’?). Revista Fe y Pueblo 17, Suma qamaña: Miradas críticas al Vivir Bien. La Paz: Instituto Superior Ecumenico Andino de Teologia (ISEAT).
Spivak, G.C. (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271–313.
Svampa, M. (2007) Introducción: Los múltiples rostros de Bolivia. In: M. Svampa y P. Stefanoni (eds.) Bolivia: Memoria, Insurgencia y Movimientos Sociales. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial El Colectivo, Osal-Clacso.
Svampa, M. (2010) Movimientos Sociales, matrices socio-políticos y nuevos escenarios en América Latina. Working Papers 01, Universität Kassel, Germany.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1990) Human Development Report: Concept and Measurement of Human Development. New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1996) Human Development Report: Economic Growth and Human Development. New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correction
This article has been corrected online, as an administrative error replicated the article disclaimer in the English abstract. This has been corrected and the related disclaimer removed. Additionally, the original version of this paper stated the author's affiliation as UNESCAP when in fact no affiliation should have been given.
We apologise to the author for these errors and for any confusion caused to the reader.
This article has been developed from a paper originally presented at the EADI-DSA 2011 Annual Conference: ‘Rethinking Development in an Age of Scarcity and Uncertainty’, York, 19–22 September 2011.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costoya, M. Latin American Post-Neoliberal Development Thinking: The Bolivian ‘Turn’ Toward Suma Qamaña. Eur J Dev Res 25, 213–229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.41
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.41