Skip to main content
Log in

Why Are Some People Poor?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the debate on the changing ‘geography’ or location of global poverty. Specifically, that most global poverty is concentrated in a set of populous countries that have transitioned from low income countries to middle income countries. The article argues that the shift in global poverty implies a questioning of the dominant theory of absolute poverty in all but the world’s very poorest countries: that is, that poverty in developing countries is explicable at societal level by insufficient public and private resources to address absolute poverty. Instead, it is argued that a structural theory – meaning here a theory that takes account of questions of distribution – is increasingly relevant to most (but not all) of global poverty.

Abstract

Cet article repasse le débat sur la géographie ou l’emplacement changeant de la pauvreté globale. La plupart de la pauvreté globale est concentre dans des pays très peuples, qui ont fait la transition d’un faible revenue par personne a un revenu moyen par personne. On soutient que le changement dans la pauvreté globale comporte une mise en cause de la théorie dominante de la pauvreté absolue (c’est-à-dire, que la pauvreté dans les pays en voie de développement peut être expliqué au niveau sociale par la manque de ressources publiques et prives pour l’adresser) dans tous les pays du monde a exception des plus pauvres. Plutôt, on soutient qu’une théorie structurelle (qui tient en compte des questions de distribution) est de plus en plus approprié à la plupart de la pauvreté globale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See for range of discussions see: Sumner, 2010, 2012; Alkire et al, 2011, 2015a, 2015b; Clarke and Feeny, 2011; Glennie, 2011; Poke and Whitman, 2011; Alonso, 2012; Edward and Sumner, 2014; Haddad, 2012, 2014; Herbert, 2012; Kanbur and Sumner, 2012; Keeley, 2012; Lundsgaarde, 2012; Carbone, 2013; Sumner and Mallet, 2012; Vásquez and Sumner, 2013, 2015; Alonso et al, 2014; Ottersen et al, 2014; Madrueño-Aguilar, 2015; Koch, 2015.

  2. Thanks to Isa Baud and Laura Camfield for comments on an earlier draft.

  3. This is ‘new bottom billion’ is based taking a consumption poverty line of $2 (in 2005 PPP) or $2.50 (in 2011PPP) or by taking multi-dimensional poverty (see Alkire et al, 2011, 2013, 2015a, 2015b).

  4. Estimates at $1.90 in 2012 differ slightly from the World Bank estimates of 896.7 million (of Ferriera et al, 2015) and 902 million (of Cruz et al, 2015) because estimates here do not ‘fill’ missing data with regional averages (see Ferriera et al, 2015, p. 28) nor extrapolate as the World Bank does, but take the closest available year.

  5. The UN LDC is based on a methodology that combines human assets (including nutrition, child mortality, school enrolment and adult literacy), economic vulnerability (measures of the instability of agricultural production, population displaced by natural disasters, instability in exports, and the share of agriculture in GDP and exports), proxies for economic ‘smallness’, ‘remoteness’ and GNI (Atlas) per capita. The main problem of the LDC category is that it is somewhat static. Guillaumont (2009), among others, has argued that the graduation criteria make it very difficult for countries to ‘graduate’, as the conditions for exit are difficult to meet.

  6. It is the case that some LDCs are actually MICs, and this somewhat undermines the sense of the LDCs being the poorest countries across a set of dimensions. Some are, at least in income per capita terms, not among the poorest LDCs; they are small population or small-island MICs, developing states that ought to be considered separately because of the specific macroeconomic vulnerabilities of such economies.

  7. Harriss-White identifies the following ways in which capitalism creates poverty: petty commodity production and trade, technological change and unemployment, (petty) commodification, harmful commodities and waste, pauperizing crises, climate-change related pauperization, and the unnecessary and/or incapacitated and/or dependent human body under capitalism.

  8. There are caveats, not least that food prices may rise due to the removal of the subsidy because of transportation costs though the poorest could be compensated for these too.

References

  • Alkire, S. and Foster, J. E. (2011) Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7): 476–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., Roche, J., Santos, E. and Seth, S. (2011) Multidimensional Poverty 2011. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., Roche, J., Seth, S. and Sumner, A. (2013) Where do the World’s Multidimensionally Poor People Live?, OPHI Working Paper 61, OPHI: University of Oxford.

  • Alkire, S., Roche, J., Seth, S. and Sumner, A. (2015a) Identifying the poorest people and groups: Strategies using the global multidimensional poverty index. Journal of International Development 27 (2015): 362–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., Roche, J. and Vas, A. (2015b) Changes Over Time in Multi-Dimensional Poverty: Methodology and Results for 34 Countries. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, J. (2012) From Aid to Global Development Policy. New York: UNDESA. UNDESA Working Paper No. 121.

  • Alonso, J., Cortez, A. and Klasen, S. (2014) LDC and Other Country Groupings: How Useful are Current Approaches to Classify Countries in a More Heterogeneous Developing World? New York: UNDESA. UNDESA Working Paper.

  • Arze del Granado, F.J., Coady, D. and Gillingham, R. (2012) The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: A review of evidence for developing countries. World Development 40: 2234–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, K. (2007) The Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty: An Overview. Chronic Poverty Research Centre (CPRC) Background Paper. London and Manchester: CPRC.

  • Carbone, M. (2013) International development and the European Union’s external policies: Changing contexts, problematic nexuses, contested partnerships. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 26 (3): 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. and Feeny, S. (2011) Old challenges and new opportunities for the MDGs: Now and beyond 2015. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 16 (4): 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, B. et al. (2013) Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications. Washington DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2007) Bottom Billion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, M., Foster, J., Quillin, B. and Schellekens1, P. (2015) Ending Extreme Poverty and Sharing Prosperity: Progress and Policies. World Bank Policy Research Note Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. and Shapiro, J. (2007) Moving On, Staying Behind, Getting lost: Lessons on Poverty Mobility from Longitudinal Data. Global Poverty Research Group (GPRG) Working Paper. Manchester/Oxford: GPRG.

  • Edward, P. and Sumner, A. (2014) Estimating the scale and geography of global poverty now and in the future: How much difference do method and assumptions make? World Development 58: 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. et al. (2015) A Global Count of the Extreme Poor in 2012: Data issues, methodology and initial results. World Bank Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Glennie, J. (2011) The Role of Aid to Middle-Income Countries: A Contribution to Evolving EU Development Policy. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Nandy, S., Pantazis, C, Pemberton, S. and Townsend, P. (2002) The Nature and Extent of Child Poverty in Developing Countries. Bristol Univerity: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. and McGregor, J.A. (eds) (2007) Wellbeing in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaumont, P. (2009) Caught in a Trap, Identifying the Least Developed Countries. Paris: FERDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L. (2012) Five assumptions of dominant thinking in international development. Development 55 (1): 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L. (2014) Equity: Not only for idealists. Development Policy Review 33 (1): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. (2007) Bringing Politics back into Poverty Analysis: Why Understanding Social Relations Matters More for Policy on Chronic Poverty than Measurement. Chronic Poverty Research Centre (CPRC) Working Paper. Manchester: CPRC.

  • Harriss-White, B. (2005) Poverty and Capitalism. Queen Elizabeth House (QEH) Working Paper 13. Oxford: QEH.

  • Herbert, S. (2012) Reassessing Aid to Middleincome Countries: The Implications of the European Commission’s Policy of Differentiation for Developing Countries. London: ODI. ODI Working Paper, http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.

  • Hills, J. and Stewart, K. (2005) A More Equal Society? New Labour, Poverty, Inequality and Exclusion, 1st ed. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D. and Shepherd, A. (2003) Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World Development 31 (3): 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R. and Sumner, A. (2012) Poor countries or poor people? Development assistance and the new geography of global poverty. Journal of International Development 24 (6): 686–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, B. (2012) OECD Insights From Aid to Development The Global Fight against Poverty. Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (2015) From poverty reduction to mutual interests? The debate on differentiation in EU development policy. Development Policy Review 33 (4): 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2006) Pathways out of and into poverty in 36 villages of Andhra Pradesh, India. World Development 34 (2): 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahoti, R. and Reddy, S. (2015) $1.90: What Does it Say? Paper downloaded 1 December at: https://reddytoread.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/wbpovblogoct6final1.pdf.

  • López-Calva, Luis F. and Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2014) A vulnerability approach to the definition of the middle class. The Journal of Economic Inequality 12 (1): 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundsgaarde, E. (2012) The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrueño-Aguilar, R. (2015) Global income distribution and the middle-income strata: Implications for the world development taxonomy debate. European Journal of Development Research.

  • Moser, C. (1998) The asset vulnerability framework: reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development 26 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. et al. (1999) Voices of the Poor: Crying out for Change. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottersen, T., Kamath, A., Moon, S. and Røttingen, J.A. (2014) Development Assistance for Health: Quantitative Allocation Criteria and Contribution Norms. London: Chatham House. Chatham House Working Paper.

  • Poke, N. and Whitman, J. (2011) The millennium development goals and development after 2015. Third World Quarterly 32 (1): 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2013) The Idea of Antipoverty Policy. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

  • Ruggeri, C., Laderchi, R.S. and Stewart, F. (2003) Does it Matter that We Don’t Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches. Queen Elizabeth House (QEH) Working Paper. Oxford: QEH.

  • Sen, A. (1983) Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 35 (2): 153–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F., Saith, R. and Harriss-White, B. (eds) (2007) Defining Poverty in the Developing World. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. (2010) Global Poverty and the New Bottom Billion: What if Three-Quarters of the World’s Poor Live in Middle-Income Countries? Brighton, UK: IDS. Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Working Paper 349.

  • Sumner, A. (2012) Where do the poor live? World Development 40 (5): 865–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. and Mallet, R. (2012) The Future of Foreign Aid: Development Cooperation and the New Geography of Global Poverty. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. and Gordon, D. (eds) (2002) World Poverty: New Policies to Defeat an Old Enemy. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez, S. and Sumner, A. (2013) Revisiting the meaning of development: A multidimensional taxonomy of developing countries. Journal of Development Studies 49 (12): 1728–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez, S. and Sumner, A. (2015) Is the ‘developing world’ changing? A dynamic and multidimensional taxonomy of developing countries. European Journal of Development Research. in press.

  • Wood, G. and Gough, I. (2006) A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development 34 (10): 1696–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2015a) Country and lending groups, http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups, accessed 1 December 2015.

  • World Bank (2015b) PovcalNet, http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/, accessed 1 December 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumner, A. Why Are Some People Poor?. Eur J Dev Res 28, 130–142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.2

Keywords

Navigation