Abstract
We investigate whether financial development benefits from financial globalisation are questionable until certain thresholds of financial globalisation are attained. The empirical evidence is based on (i) data from 53 African countries for the period 2000–2011 and (ii) interactive Generalised Method of Moments with forward orthogonal deviations. The following findings are established. First, thresholds of Net Foreign Direct Investment Inflows as a percentage of GDP (FDIgdp) from which financial globalisation increases money supply are 20.50 and 16.00 for below- and above-median sub-samples of financial globalisation, respectively. Second, FDIgdp thresholds from which financial globalisation increases banking system activity and financial system activity for below-median sub-samples of financial globalisation are 13.81 and 13.29, respectively. Third, for financial size, there is evidence of: (i) a positive threshold of 21.30 in the full sample and (ii) consistent increasing returns without a modifying threshold for the above-median sub-sample. Policy implications are discussed.
Abstract
Nous faisons une enquête pour savoir si les avantages au développement financier de la mondialisation financière sont contestables jusqu’à ce que certains seuils de la mondialisation financière soient atteints. Les données empiriques sont fondées sur; (i) les données de 53 pays africains pour la période 2000–2011 et (ii) la Méthode interactive des Moments Généralisés avec des déviations orthogonales avants. Les résultats suivants sont avérés. Tout d’abord, les seuils des entrées nettes d’investissements direct à l’étranger en pourcentage du PIB (IDE Pib), à partir desquels la mondialisation financière augmente la masse monétaire, sont respectivement en dessous et au-dessus de la médiane de 20,50 et 16,00 des sous-échantillons de la mondialisation financière. Ensuite, les seuils IDE Pib, à partir desquels la mondialisation financière augmente l’activité du système bancaire et l’activité du système financier, sont respectivement de 13,81 et 13,29. Enfin, en ce qui concerne le volume financier, il y a des preuves de: (i) un seuil positif de 21,30 à l’ensemble de l’échantillon et (ii) rendements croissants réguliers sans modification du seuil pour les sous-échantillons au-dessus de la médiane. Les retombées politiques sont discutées.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We use the terms ‘financial development’ and ‘domestic financial development’ interchangeably throughout this study.
According to the theoretical underpinnings, less-developed countries are comparatively lacking in capital but rich in labour. Hence, access to foreign capital is a means to increasing investment and therefore economic prosperity. However, developed nations have less volatile output than have developing countries, which enhances potential gains from the latter (Kose et al, 2011).
‘In this paper we develop a unified empirical framework for characterising such threshold conditions. We find that there are clearly identifiable thresholds in variables such as financial depth and institutional quality: the cost-benefit trade-off from financial openness improves significantly once these threshold conditions are satisfied’ (Kose et al, 2011, p. 147).
This notion of threshold is also consistent with Cummins (2000) on a minimum threshold/level in language proficiency before second-language speakers can start reaping the rewards from a given language. Moreover, our definition of threshold is also in accordance with the theory of critical mass that has been substantially documented in the economic development literature (see Roller and Waverman, 2001; Ashraf and Galor, 2013). A recent application of the critical mass or threshold theory based on interaction variables can be found in Batuo (2015). Hence, in our view, threshold effects can be obtained from interactive regressions. In essence, within the frame of this study, the notion of threshold is not different from: (i) critical mass for positive effects (Roller and Waverman, 2001; Batuo, 2015); (ii) minimum requirement for enjoying of positive effects (Cummins, 2000); and (iii) conditions for Kuznets and U shapes (Ashraf and Galor, 2013).
The de facto and de jure measures of financial globalisation are foreign direct investment and KAOPEN (from Chinn and Ito, 2002), respectively.
‘Borrowing from the FDSD, this paper measures financial depth both from overall-economic and financial system perspectives with indicators of broad money supply (M2/GDP) and financial system deposits (Fdgdp) respectively. While the former denotes the monetary base plus demand, saving and time deposits, the latter indicates liquid liabilities. Since we are dealing exclusively with developing countries, we distinguish liquid liabilities from money supply because a substantial chunk of the monetary base does not transit through the banking sector’ (Asongu, 2014, p. 189). The two proxies, which are in ratios of GDP (see Appendix A) can robustly cross-check each other as either account for over 97.4 per cent of information in the other (see Appendix C).
‘By financial intermediation efficiency here, this study neither refers to the profitability-oriented concept nor to the production efficiency of decision making units in the financial sector (through Data Envelopment Analysis: DEA). What we seek to highlight is the ability of banks to effectively fulfil their fundamental role of transforming mobilized deposits into credit for economic operators (agents). We adopt proxies for banking-system-efficiency and financial-system-efficiency (respectively “bank credit on bank deposits: Bcbd” and “financial system credit on financial system deposits: Fcfd”)’ (Asongu, 2014, pp. 189–190). Like with financial depth, these two financial allocation efficiency indictors have a degree of substitution of 86.80 per cent (see Appendix C). Hence, one can be used to check the consistency of the other. According to Chen (1996), FDI location decisions are substantially determined by allocation efficiency.
‘By financial intermediary activity here, the work highlights the ability of banks to grant credit to economic operators. We proxy for both banking intermediary activity and financial intermediary activity with “private domestic credit by deposit banks: Pcrb” and “private credit by domestic banks and other financial institutions: Pcrbof” respectively’ (Asongu, 2014, p. 190). In light of Appendix C, the two measures can be used to cross-check one another.
According to the FDSD, financial intermediary size is measured as the ratio of ‘deposit bank assets’ to ‘total assets’ (deposit bank assets on central bank assets plus deposit bank assets: Dbacba).
Hence, for the purpose of simplicity ‘sub-sample with below-median FDI’ is used to refer to the ‘sub-sample with below (or equal) median FDI inflows.’
20.500 is the rewarding threshold because it represents the point where the overall impact of FDI on money supply becomes positive. Accordingly: (20.50 × 0.016)+(−0.328)=0. Consistent with the definition of threshold provided in the introduction, a threshold is the inflexion point from which the underlying function is either U or Kuznets shape. In order words, 20.500 is the threshold at which the overall sign of FDI changes from negative to positive.
References
Aizenman, J. and Glick, R. (2009) Sterilization, monetary policy, and global financial integration. Review of International Economics 17(4): 777–801.
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–297.
Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error component model. Journal of Econometrics 68(1): 29–52.
Ashraf, Q. and Galor, O. (2013) The out of Africa hypothesis, human genetic diversity, and comparative economic development. American Economic Review 103(1): 1–46.
Asongu, S.A. (2013) How has politico-economic liberalisation affected financial allocation efficiency? Fresh African evidence. Economics Bulletin 33(1): 663–676.
Asongu, S.A. (2014) Financial development dynamic thresholds of financial globalisation: Evidence from Africa. Journal of Economics Studies 41(2): 166–195.
Asongu, S.A. (2015) Finance and growth: New evidence from meta-analysis. Managerial Finance 41(6): 615–639.
Asongu, S.A. and Nwachukwu, J.C. (2015) The incremental effect of education on corruption: Evidence of synergy from lifelong learning. Economics Bulletin 35(4): 2288–2308.
Asongu, S.A. and Nwachukwu, J.C. (2016) Foreign aid and governance in Africa. International Review of Applied Economics 30(1): 69–88.
Asongu, S.A. and Rangan, G. (2015) Trust and Quality of Growth. Yaoundé, Cameroon: African Governance and Development Institute. Working Paper No. 15/011.
Azzimonti, M., De Francisco, E. and Quadrini, V. (2014) Financial globalisation, inequality and the rising public debt. American Economic Review 104(8): 2267–2302.
Baltagi, B.H. (2008) Forecasting with panel data. Journal of Forecasting 27(2): 153–173.
Batuo, M.E. (2015) The role of telecommunications infrastructure in the regional economic growth of Africa. The Journal of Development Areas 49(1): 313–330.
Batuo, M.E. and Asongu, S.A. (2015) The impact of liberalisation policies on income inequality in African countries. Journal of Economic Studies 42(1): 68–100.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Levine, R. (2003) Law and finance: Why does legal origin matter? Journal of Comparative Economics 31(4): 653–675.
Bhagwati, J. (1998) The capital myth. The difference between trade in widgets and dollars. Foreign Affairs 7(3): 7–12.
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87(1): 115–143.
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31(3): 307–327.
Bond, S., Hoeffler, A. and Tample, J. (2001) GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Boyd, J.H., Levine, R. and Smith, B.D. (2001) The impact of inflation on financial sector performance. Journal of Monetary Economics 47(2): 221–248.
Brambor, T., Clark, W.M. and Golder, M. (2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.
Buckle, B. (2009) Asia-Pacific growth. Before and after the global financial crisis. Policy Quarterly 5(4): 36–45.
Chen, C.-H. (1996) Regional determinants of foreign direct investment in mainland China. Journal of Economic Studies 23(2): 18–30.
Chinn, M.D. and Ito, H. (2002) Capital Account Liberalization, Institutions and Financial Development: Cross Country Evidence. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper, No. 8967.
Cummins, J. (2000) Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Dewan, S. and Ramaprasad, J. (2014) Social media, traditional media and music sales. MIS Quarterly 38(1): 101–128.
Do, Q.T. and Levchenko, A.A. (2004) Trade and Financial Development. Washington DC: World Bank Policy. Research Working Paper No. 3347.
Dornbusch, R. (1996) It’s time for a financial transactions tax. International Economy, August/September, Washington DC.
Dornbusch, R. (1998) Capital controls: An idea whose time is past. In: M.B. Riccardi (ed.) Essays in International Finance. Princeton: Princeton University, pp. 20–27.
Easterly, W. (2005) What did structural adjustment adjust? The association of policies and growth with repeated IMF and World Bank adjustment loans. Journal of Development Economics 76(1): 1–22.
Eichengreen, B. and Bordo, M.D. (2002) Crises Now and Then: What Lessons from the Last Era of Financial Globalization? NBER Working Paper No. 8716, Cambridge.
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica 50(4): 987–1008.
Engle, R.F. (2002) Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20(3): 339–350.
Fielding, D. (1994) Money demand in four African countries. Journal of Economic Studies 21(2): 3–37.
Fischer, S. (1998) Capital account liberalization and the role of the IMF. In: M.B. Riccardi (ed.) Should the IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility? Vol. 207, Essays in International Finance, Department of Economics, Princeton: Princeton University, pp. 1–10.
Fosu, A.K. (2015) Growth, inequality and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recent progress in a global context. Oxford Development Studies 43(1): 44–59.
Greenwood, J. and Jovanovic, B. (1990) Financial development, growth and distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 1076–1107.
Henry, P.B. (2007) Capital account liberalization: Theory, evidence and speculation. Journal of Economic Literature 45(4): 887–935.
Huang, Y. (2011) Private investment and financial development in a globalised world. Empirical Economics 41(1): 43–56.
Huang, Y. and Temple, J.R.W. (2005) Does External Trade Promote Financial Development? CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5150, London.
Huybens, E. and Smith, B.D. (1999) Inflation, financial markets and long-run real activity. Journal of Monetary Economics 43(2): 283–315.
Kose, M.A., Prasad, E.S., Rogoff, K. and Wei, S.J. (2006) Financial globalization: Areappraisal. IMF Staff Papers 56(1): 8–62.
Kose, M.A., Prasad, E.S. and Taylor, A.D. (2011) Threshold in the process of international financial integration. Journal of International Money and Finance 30(1): 147–179.
Leung, H.M. (2003) External debt and worsening business cycles in less developed countries. Journal of Economic Studies 30(2): 155–168.
Levine, R. (1997) Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature 35(2): 688–726.
Levine, R. (2003a) More on finance and growth: More finance, more growth. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. July/August, https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/03/07/Levine.pdf, accessed 20 June 2015.
Levine, R. (2003b) Finance and growth: Theory and evidence. In: P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier.
Love, I. and Zicchino, L. (2006) Financial development and dynamic investment behaviour: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46(2): 190–210.
McCombie, J.S.L. and Spreafico, M.R.M. (2014) Economic Geography and Cluster Policy, With Special References to Kazakhstan. CCEPP Working Paper No. 06-14, Cambridge.
Motelle, S. and Biekpe, N. (2015) Financial integration and stability in the Southern African Development Community. Journal of Economics and Business 79(May–June): 100–117.
Mulwa, M.R., Emrouznejad, A. and Murithi, F.M. (2009) Impact of liberalization on efficiency and productivity of sugar industry in Kenya. Journal of Economic Studies 36(3): 250–264.
Obstfeld, M. (1998) The global capital market: Benefactor or menace? Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(4): 9–30.
Prasad, E.S. and Rajan, R.G. (2008) A pragmatic approach to capital account liberalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(3): 149–172.
Prasad, E.S. and Wei, S.J. (2007) China’s approach to capital inflows: Patterns and possible explanations. In: S. Edwards ed. Capital Controls and Capital Flows in Emerging Economies: Policies, Practices, and Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Price, G.N. and Elu, J.U. (2014) Does regional currency integration ameliorate macroeconomic shocks in sub-Saharan Africa? The case of the 2008–2009 global financial crisis. Journal of Economic Studies 41(5): 737–750.
Rodrik, D. (1998) Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility? Essays in International Finance, No. 207. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Rodrik, D. and Subramanian, A. (2009) Why did financial globalization disappoint? IMF Staff Papers 56(1): 112–138.
Rogoff, K.S. (1999) International institutions for reducing global financial instability. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13(4): 21–42.
Roller, L.-H. and Waverman, L. (2001) Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach. American Economic Review 91(4): 909–923.
Roodman, D. (2009a) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71(1): 135–158.
Roodman, D. (2009b) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal 9(1): 86–136.
Saint-Paul, G. (1992) Technological choice, financial markets and economic development. European Economic Review 36(4): 763–781.
Shah, A. and Patnaik, I. (2009) Asia confronts the impossible trinity. Mimeo, NIPFPDEA, Delhi.
Solow, R.M. (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1): 65–94.
Stiglitz, J. (2000) Capital market liberalization, economic growth and instability. World Development 28(6): 1075–1086.
Summers, L.H. (2000) International financial crises: Causes, prevention and cures. American Economic Review 90(2): 1–16.
Wen, L. and Zhou, H. (2012) Financial and product market integration under increasing returns to scale. Eastern Economic Journal 38(Winter): 18–36.
Word Bank (2015) World Development Indicators. World Bank Publications, World Bank.
Acknowledgements
The authors are highly indebted to the editor and referees for constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asongu, S., De Moor, L. Financial Globalisation Dynamic Thresholds for Financial Development: Evidence from Africa. Eur J Dev Res 29, 192–212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.10
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.10